Poverty talk: how people experiencing poverty deny their poverty and why they blame ‘the poor’

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

110 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Drawing on life history interviews with sixty men and women in north‐east England who were caught up in ‘the low‐pay, no‐pay cycle’, this article describes how people living in poverty talk about poverty – in respect of themselves and others. Paradoxically, interviewees subscribed to a powerful set of ideas that denied poverty and morally condemned ‘the poor’. These findings are theorized in four ways: first, informants deployed close points of comparison that diminished a sense of relative poverty and deprivation; second, dissociation from ‘the poor’ reflects long‐running stigma and shame but is given extra force by current forms of ‘scroungerphobia’; third, discourses of the ‘undeserving poor’ articulate with a more general contemporary prejudice against the working class, which fuels the impetus to dissociate from ‘the poor’ (and to disidentify with the working class); and fourth, the hegemonic orthodoxy that blames ‘the poor’ for their poverty can more easily dominate in contexts where more solidaristic forms of working‐class life are in decline.
LanguageEnglish
Pages285-303
JournalSociological Review
Volume61
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

poverty
working class
shame
deprivation
prejudice
discourse
interview

Cite this

@article{00a61992324a4adfbb703c05099eda9a,
title = "Poverty talk: how people experiencing poverty deny their poverty and why they blame ‘the poor’",
abstract = "Drawing on life history interviews with sixty men and women in north‐east England who were caught up in ‘the low‐pay, no‐pay cycle’, this article describes how people living in poverty talk about poverty – in respect of themselves and others. Paradoxically, interviewees subscribed to a powerful set of ideas that denied poverty and morally condemned ‘the poor’. These findings are theorized in four ways: first, informants deployed close points of comparison that diminished a sense of relative poverty and deprivation; second, dissociation from ‘the poor’ reflects long‐running stigma and shame but is given extra force by current forms of ‘scroungerphobia’; third, discourses of the ‘undeserving poor’ articulate with a more general contemporary prejudice against the working class, which fuels the impetus to dissociate from ‘the poor’ (and to disidentify with the working class); and fourth, the hegemonic orthodoxy that blames ‘the poor’ for their poverty can more easily dominate in contexts where more solidaristic forms of working‐class life are in decline.",
keywords = "poverty, undeserving poor, prejudice, working class, class disidentification",
author = "Robert MacDonald",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1111/1467-954X.12018",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "285--303",
journal = "Sociological Review",
issn = "0038-0261",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Poverty talk : how people experiencing poverty deny their poverty and why they blame ‘the poor’. / MacDonald, Robert.

In: Sociological Review, Vol. 61, No. 2, 2013, p. 285-303.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Poverty talk

T2 - Sociological Review

AU - MacDonald, Robert

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Drawing on life history interviews with sixty men and women in north‐east England who were caught up in ‘the low‐pay, no‐pay cycle’, this article describes how people living in poverty talk about poverty – in respect of themselves and others. Paradoxically, interviewees subscribed to a powerful set of ideas that denied poverty and morally condemned ‘the poor’. These findings are theorized in four ways: first, informants deployed close points of comparison that diminished a sense of relative poverty and deprivation; second, dissociation from ‘the poor’ reflects long‐running stigma and shame but is given extra force by current forms of ‘scroungerphobia’; third, discourses of the ‘undeserving poor’ articulate with a more general contemporary prejudice against the working class, which fuels the impetus to dissociate from ‘the poor’ (and to disidentify with the working class); and fourth, the hegemonic orthodoxy that blames ‘the poor’ for their poverty can more easily dominate in contexts where more solidaristic forms of working‐class life are in decline.

AB - Drawing on life history interviews with sixty men and women in north‐east England who were caught up in ‘the low‐pay, no‐pay cycle’, this article describes how people living in poverty talk about poverty – in respect of themselves and others. Paradoxically, interviewees subscribed to a powerful set of ideas that denied poverty and morally condemned ‘the poor’. These findings are theorized in four ways: first, informants deployed close points of comparison that diminished a sense of relative poverty and deprivation; second, dissociation from ‘the poor’ reflects long‐running stigma and shame but is given extra force by current forms of ‘scroungerphobia’; third, discourses of the ‘undeserving poor’ articulate with a more general contemporary prejudice against the working class, which fuels the impetus to dissociate from ‘the poor’ (and to disidentify with the working class); and fourth, the hegemonic orthodoxy that blames ‘the poor’ for their poverty can more easily dominate in contexts where more solidaristic forms of working‐class life are in decline.

KW - poverty

KW - undeserving poor

KW - prejudice

KW - working class

KW - class disidentification

U2 - 10.1111/1467-954X.12018

DO - 10.1111/1467-954X.12018

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 285

EP - 303

JO - Sociological Review

JF - Sociological Review

SN - 0038-0261

IS - 2

ER -