Practice-based evidence

Towards collaborative and transgressive research

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

79 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Studies of the application of research in policy and service delivery suggest that the translation of research findings into practice is not straightforward. Practitioners are criticized for failing to base actions on research evidence, while academic research is sometimes condemned as 'irrelevant' to practice. This paper argues that this conflict derives in part from an academic model of research constructed in opposition to practice. Reflections on scientific logocentrism (claims to possess unmediated knowledge of reality) and 'transgressive' action research provide a critique of traditional research and suggest an alternative, practice-based research model. Three propositons for generating 'practice-based evidence' are identified. Firstly, the pursuit of knowledge should be acknowledged as a local and contingent process. Secondly, research activity should be constitutive of difference, questioning the legitimation and repression of particular aspects of the world. Finally, theory-building should be seen as an adjunct to practical activity. Together, these positions dissolve the researcher/researched and research/practice oppositions in traditional research and supply an ethically and politically engaged research. Practice-based research is explored in terms of four moments in the research process.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)81-102
Number of pages22
JournalSociology
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

evidence
opposition
legitimation
repression
research practice
research process
action research

Cite this

@article{ef5ba8c9deba4b66bb0153721a582b4a,
title = "Practice-based evidence: Towards collaborative and transgressive research",
abstract = "Studies of the application of research in policy and service delivery suggest that the translation of research findings into practice is not straightforward. Practitioners are criticized for failing to base actions on research evidence, while academic research is sometimes condemned as 'irrelevant' to practice. This paper argues that this conflict derives in part from an academic model of research constructed in opposition to practice. Reflections on scientific logocentrism (claims to possess unmediated knowledge of reality) and 'transgressive' action research provide a critique of traditional research and suggest an alternative, practice-based research model. Three propositons for generating 'practice-based evidence' are identified. Firstly, the pursuit of knowledge should be acknowledged as a local and contingent process. Secondly, research activity should be constitutive of difference, questioning the legitimation and repression of particular aspects of the world. Finally, theory-building should be seen as an adjunct to practical activity. Together, these positions dissolve the researcher/researched and research/practice oppositions in traditional research and supply an ethically and politically engaged research. Practice-based research is explored in terms of four moments in the research process.",
keywords = "Action research, Post-structuralism, Postmodernism, Research methods, Social theory",
author = "Fox, {Nick J.}",
year = "2003",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0038038503037001388",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "81--102",
journal = "Sociology",
issn = "0038-0385",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "1",

}

Practice-based evidence : Towards collaborative and transgressive research. / Fox, Nick J.

In: Sociology, Vol. 37, No. 1, 01.02.2003, p. 81-102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practice-based evidence

T2 - Towards collaborative and transgressive research

AU - Fox, Nick J.

PY - 2003/2/1

Y1 - 2003/2/1

N2 - Studies of the application of research in policy and service delivery suggest that the translation of research findings into practice is not straightforward. Practitioners are criticized for failing to base actions on research evidence, while academic research is sometimes condemned as 'irrelevant' to practice. This paper argues that this conflict derives in part from an academic model of research constructed in opposition to practice. Reflections on scientific logocentrism (claims to possess unmediated knowledge of reality) and 'transgressive' action research provide a critique of traditional research and suggest an alternative, practice-based research model. Three propositons for generating 'practice-based evidence' are identified. Firstly, the pursuit of knowledge should be acknowledged as a local and contingent process. Secondly, research activity should be constitutive of difference, questioning the legitimation and repression of particular aspects of the world. Finally, theory-building should be seen as an adjunct to practical activity. Together, these positions dissolve the researcher/researched and research/practice oppositions in traditional research and supply an ethically and politically engaged research. Practice-based research is explored in terms of four moments in the research process.

AB - Studies of the application of research in policy and service delivery suggest that the translation of research findings into practice is not straightforward. Practitioners are criticized for failing to base actions on research evidence, while academic research is sometimes condemned as 'irrelevant' to practice. This paper argues that this conflict derives in part from an academic model of research constructed in opposition to practice. Reflections on scientific logocentrism (claims to possess unmediated knowledge of reality) and 'transgressive' action research provide a critique of traditional research and suggest an alternative, practice-based research model. Three propositons for generating 'practice-based evidence' are identified. Firstly, the pursuit of knowledge should be acknowledged as a local and contingent process. Secondly, research activity should be constitutive of difference, questioning the legitimation and repression of particular aspects of the world. Finally, theory-building should be seen as an adjunct to practical activity. Together, these positions dissolve the researcher/researched and research/practice oppositions in traditional research and supply an ethically and politically engaged research. Practice-based research is explored in terms of four moments in the research process.

KW - Action research

KW - Post-structuralism

KW - Postmodernism

KW - Research methods

KW - Social theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037331399&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0038038503037001388

DO - 10.1177/0038038503037001388

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 81

EP - 102

JO - Sociology

JF - Sociology

SN - 0038-0385

IS - 1

ER -