Predictors and Associates of Problem–Reaction–Solution

Statistical Bias, Emotion-Based Reasoning, and Belief in the Paranormal

Kenneth Drinkwater, Neil Dagnall, Andrew Denovan, Andrew Parker, Peter Clough

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Major conspiracy theorists propose that problem–reaction–solution (PRS) functions as a mechanism for constructing and exaggerating social problems to garner populist support for the implementation (imposition) of laws that society would normally deem unacceptable. To evaluate this supposition, 248 participants recruited through convenience sampling, completed measures assessing PRS, statistical bias, emotion-based reasoning (EBR), and belief in the paranormal. Structural equation modeling revealed differential relationships existed between components of statistical bias, EBR, and belief endorsement (PRS and paranormal). Specifically, proneness to conjunction error predicted PRS, whereas misperception of randomness and to an extent EBR best explained belief in the paranormal. These results indicated that respondents were willing to accept PRS scenarios as legitimate and validate PRS-proposed solutions based on rational rather than emotional appeal.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages11
JournalSAGE Open
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

emotion
trend
Social Problems
appeal
scenario
Law
Emotion
Paranormal
Predictors
Society

Cite this

@article{bc6c785bc413412cb2ed1d55f4d689da,
title = "Predictors and Associates of Problem–Reaction–Solution: Statistical Bias, Emotion-Based Reasoning, and Belief in the Paranormal",
abstract = "Major conspiracy theorists propose that problem–reaction–solution (PRS) functions as a mechanism for constructing and exaggerating social problems to garner populist support for the implementation (imposition) of laws that society would normally deem unacceptable. To evaluate this supposition, 248 participants recruited through convenience sampling, completed measures assessing PRS, statistical bias, emotion-based reasoning (EBR), and belief in the paranormal. Structural equation modeling revealed differential relationships existed between components of statistical bias, EBR, and belief endorsement (PRS and paranormal). Specifically, proneness to conjunction error predicted PRS, whereas misperception of randomness and to an extent EBR best explained belief in the paranormal. These results indicated that respondents were willing to accept PRS scenarios as legitimate and validate PRS-proposed solutions based on rational rather than emotional appeal.",
keywords = "belief in the paranormal, emotion-based reasoning, problem–reaction–solution, statistical bias",
author = "Kenneth Drinkwater and Neil Dagnall and Andrew Denovan and Andrew Parker and Peter Clough",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1177/2158244018762999",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "SAGE Open",
issn = "2158-2440",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Predictors and Associates of Problem–Reaction–Solution : Statistical Bias, Emotion-Based Reasoning, and Belief in the Paranormal. / Drinkwater, Kenneth; Dagnall, Neil; Denovan, Andrew; Parker, Andrew; Clough, Peter.

In: SAGE Open, Vol. 8, No. 1, 19.03.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predictors and Associates of Problem–Reaction–Solution

T2 - Statistical Bias, Emotion-Based Reasoning, and Belief in the Paranormal

AU - Drinkwater, Kenneth

AU - Dagnall, Neil

AU - Denovan, Andrew

AU - Parker, Andrew

AU - Clough, Peter

PY - 2018/3/19

Y1 - 2018/3/19

N2 - Major conspiracy theorists propose that problem–reaction–solution (PRS) functions as a mechanism for constructing and exaggerating social problems to garner populist support for the implementation (imposition) of laws that society would normally deem unacceptable. To evaluate this supposition, 248 participants recruited through convenience sampling, completed measures assessing PRS, statistical bias, emotion-based reasoning (EBR), and belief in the paranormal. Structural equation modeling revealed differential relationships existed between components of statistical bias, EBR, and belief endorsement (PRS and paranormal). Specifically, proneness to conjunction error predicted PRS, whereas misperception of randomness and to an extent EBR best explained belief in the paranormal. These results indicated that respondents were willing to accept PRS scenarios as legitimate and validate PRS-proposed solutions based on rational rather than emotional appeal.

AB - Major conspiracy theorists propose that problem–reaction–solution (PRS) functions as a mechanism for constructing and exaggerating social problems to garner populist support for the implementation (imposition) of laws that society would normally deem unacceptable. To evaluate this supposition, 248 participants recruited through convenience sampling, completed measures assessing PRS, statistical bias, emotion-based reasoning (EBR), and belief in the paranormal. Structural equation modeling revealed differential relationships existed between components of statistical bias, EBR, and belief endorsement (PRS and paranormal). Specifically, proneness to conjunction error predicted PRS, whereas misperception of randomness and to an extent EBR best explained belief in the paranormal. These results indicated that respondents were willing to accept PRS scenarios as legitimate and validate PRS-proposed solutions based on rational rather than emotional appeal.

KW - belief in the paranormal

KW - emotion-based reasoning

KW - problem–reaction–solution

KW - statistical bias

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044721607&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2158244018762999

DO - 10.1177/2158244018762999

M3 - Article

VL - 8

JO - SAGE Open

JF - SAGE Open

SN - 2158-2440

IS - 1

ER -