Price and volatility spillovers across the international steam coal market

Jonathan A. Batten, Janusz Brzeszczynski, Cetin Ciner, Chi Keung Lau, Brian M. Lucey, Larisa Yarovaya

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

We examine the degree of integration of the global steam coal market. Using a variety of measures, we show that the Australian market remains the dominant force in setting world coal prices, followed by Mozambique and South Africa. We find little evidence of asymmetric price and volatility transmission. In fact, most markets react to both positive and negative shocks in a symmetric manner. The coal market displays a significant degree of integration, although this effect varies over time. While China provides a major source of volatility to the global coal market, it is relatively insignificant in terms of price transmission.

LanguageEnglish
Pages119-138
Number of pages20
JournalEnergy Economics
Volume77
Early online date5 Jan 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Coal
volatility
Steam
steam
coal
Mozambique
Republic of South Africa
China
shock
Volatility spillover

Cite this

Batten, J. A., Brzeszczynski, J., Ciner, C., Lau, C. K., Lucey, B. M., & Yarovaya, L. (2019). Price and volatility spillovers across the international steam coal market. Energy Economics, 77, 119-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.12.002
Batten, Jonathan A. ; Brzeszczynski, Janusz ; Ciner, Cetin ; Lau, Chi Keung ; Lucey, Brian M. ; Yarovaya, Larisa. / Price and volatility spillovers across the international steam coal market. In: Energy Economics. 2019 ; Vol. 77. pp. 119-138.
@article{420058601222436282d1bd48500e3d78,
title = "Price and volatility spillovers across the international steam coal market",
abstract = "We examine the degree of integration of the global steam coal market. Using a variety of measures, we show that the Australian market remains the dominant force in setting world coal prices, followed by Mozambique and South Africa. We find little evidence of asymmetric price and volatility transmission. In fact, most markets react to both positive and negative shocks in a symmetric manner. The coal market displays a significant degree of integration, although this effect varies over time. While China provides a major source of volatility to the global coal market, it is relatively insignificant in terms of price transmission.",
keywords = "Integration, Information transmissions, Generalized VAR model, Steam coal",
author = "Batten, {Jonathan A.} and Janusz Brzeszczynski and Cetin Ciner and Lau, {Chi Keung} and Lucey, {Brian M.} and Larisa Yarovaya",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.eneco.2018.12.002",
language = "English",
volume = "77",
pages = "119--138",
journal = "Energy Economics",
issn = "0140-9883",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Batten, JA, Brzeszczynski, J, Ciner, C, Lau, CK, Lucey, BM & Yarovaya, L 2019, 'Price and volatility spillovers across the international steam coal market', Energy Economics, vol. 77, pp. 119-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.12.002

Price and volatility spillovers across the international steam coal market. / Batten, Jonathan A.; Brzeszczynski, Janusz; Ciner, Cetin; Lau, Chi Keung; Lucey, Brian M.; Yarovaya, Larisa.

In: Energy Economics, Vol. 77, 01.2019, p. 119-138.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Price and volatility spillovers across the international steam coal market

AU - Batten, Jonathan A.

AU - Brzeszczynski, Janusz

AU - Ciner, Cetin

AU - Lau, Chi Keung

AU - Lucey, Brian M.

AU - Yarovaya, Larisa

PY - 2019/1

Y1 - 2019/1

N2 - We examine the degree of integration of the global steam coal market. Using a variety of measures, we show that the Australian market remains the dominant force in setting world coal prices, followed by Mozambique and South Africa. We find little evidence of asymmetric price and volatility transmission. In fact, most markets react to both positive and negative shocks in a symmetric manner. The coal market displays a significant degree of integration, although this effect varies over time. While China provides a major source of volatility to the global coal market, it is relatively insignificant in terms of price transmission.

AB - We examine the degree of integration of the global steam coal market. Using a variety of measures, we show that the Australian market remains the dominant force in setting world coal prices, followed by Mozambique and South Africa. We find little evidence of asymmetric price and volatility transmission. In fact, most markets react to both positive and negative shocks in a symmetric manner. The coal market displays a significant degree of integration, although this effect varies over time. While China provides a major source of volatility to the global coal market, it is relatively insignificant in terms of price transmission.

KW - Integration

KW - Information transmissions

KW - Generalized VAR model

KW - Steam coal

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061082858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.12.002

DO - 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.12.002

M3 - Article

VL - 77

SP - 119

EP - 138

JO - Energy Economics

T2 - Energy Economics

JF - Energy Economics

SN - 0140-9883

ER -