Prioritising the enablers for the successful implementation of Kaizen in China: A fuzzy AHP study

Jie Ma, Zhibin Lin, Chi Keung Lau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to develop a better understanding of how Sino-Japanese joint ventures implemented the three Japanese improvement methods, i.e. Kaizen, Kaikaku and Kaizen Blitz. The specific objectives of this study are to identify the key enablers for the three improvement methods; and to identify the most selected improvement method.
Design/methodology/approach: This study employs a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to pairwise-compare the three improvement methods. Data are collected from 28 industry experts from Sino-Japanese joint ventures. The study then adopts extent analysis approach for pairwise comparisons and extent analysis to obtain synthetic extent values for priority weights.
Findings: The results of the study indicate that personnel (humanware) factor enablers are the most important factor for Kaizen, whilst software factor enablers (essential rules, policies and institutional arrangements) weight second and hardware factor enablers (physical, measurable hard facts or resources) weight last. The study also reviews that Kaizen is the most selected improvement method among the three.
Research limitations/implications: The sample of this study is limited to Sino-Japanese ventures in Guangzhou, China. This study only identifies the key improvement enablers based on interviews with shop floor managers and improvement experts.
Practical implications: Practical implications are threefold: the improvement implementations should be based on factors such as regular training, incentives for motivations and shop floor management; improvement methods are transferable and standard operations may only have small effects on collecting improvement ideas; and Kaizen is the appropriate method to support long-term and process-oriented improvements.
Originality/value: This study is the first to specifically pairwise-compare the three Japanese improvement methods and to identify priorities of their key enablers in Sino-Japanese joint ventures.
LanguageEnglish
Pages549-568
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Journal of Quality and Reliability Management
Volume34
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Kaizen
Enablers
China
Fuzzy AHP
Factors
Joint ventures
Shopfloor
Pairwise comparisons
Design methodology
Software
Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process
Venture
Industry
Guangzhou
Incentives
Policy rules
Institutional arrangements
Managers
Personnel
Resources

Cite this

@article{6ce5d2b5fa7f461fb831d2344e095d71,
title = "Prioritising the enablers for the successful implementation of Kaizen in China: A fuzzy AHP study",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to develop a better understanding of how Sino-Japanese joint ventures implemented the three Japanese improvement methods, i.e. Kaizen, Kaikaku and Kaizen Blitz. The specific objectives of this study are to identify the key enablers for the three improvement methods; and to identify the most selected improvement method.Design/methodology/approach: This study employs a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to pairwise-compare the three improvement methods. Data are collected from 28 industry experts from Sino-Japanese joint ventures. The study then adopts extent analysis approach for pairwise comparisons and extent analysis to obtain synthetic extent values for priority weights.Findings: The results of the study indicate that personnel (humanware) factor enablers are the most important factor for Kaizen, whilst software factor enablers (essential rules, policies and institutional arrangements) weight second and hardware factor enablers (physical, measurable hard facts or resources) weight last. The study also reviews that Kaizen is the most selected improvement method among the three.Research limitations/implications: The sample of this study is limited to Sino-Japanese ventures in Guangzhou, China. This study only identifies the key improvement enablers based on interviews with shop floor managers and improvement experts.Practical implications: Practical implications are threefold: the improvement implementations should be based on factors such as regular training, incentives for motivations and shop floor management; improvement methods are transferable and standard operations may only have small effects on collecting improvement ideas; and Kaizen is the appropriate method to support long-term and process-oriented improvements.Originality/value: This study is the first to specifically pairwise-compare the three Japanese improvement methods and to identify priorities of their key enablers in Sino-Japanese joint ventures.",
keywords = "China, Kaizen, AHP, Decision support, Fuzzy, Improvement methods",
author = "Jie Ma and Zhibin Lin and Lau, {Chi Keung}",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/IJQRM-12-2015-0173",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "549--568",
journal = "International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management",
issn = "0265-671X",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

Prioritising the enablers for the successful implementation of Kaizen in China : A fuzzy AHP study. / Ma, Jie; Lin, Zhibin; Lau, Chi Keung.

In: International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, Vol. 34, No. 4, 01.07.2017, p. 549-568.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prioritising the enablers for the successful implementation of Kaizen in China

T2 - International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management

AU - Ma, Jie

AU - Lin, Zhibin

AU - Lau, Chi Keung

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to develop a better understanding of how Sino-Japanese joint ventures implemented the three Japanese improvement methods, i.e. Kaizen, Kaikaku and Kaizen Blitz. The specific objectives of this study are to identify the key enablers for the three improvement methods; and to identify the most selected improvement method.Design/methodology/approach: This study employs a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to pairwise-compare the three improvement methods. Data are collected from 28 industry experts from Sino-Japanese joint ventures. The study then adopts extent analysis approach for pairwise comparisons and extent analysis to obtain synthetic extent values for priority weights.Findings: The results of the study indicate that personnel (humanware) factor enablers are the most important factor for Kaizen, whilst software factor enablers (essential rules, policies and institutional arrangements) weight second and hardware factor enablers (physical, measurable hard facts or resources) weight last. The study also reviews that Kaizen is the most selected improvement method among the three.Research limitations/implications: The sample of this study is limited to Sino-Japanese ventures in Guangzhou, China. This study only identifies the key improvement enablers based on interviews with shop floor managers and improvement experts.Practical implications: Practical implications are threefold: the improvement implementations should be based on factors such as regular training, incentives for motivations and shop floor management; improvement methods are transferable and standard operations may only have small effects on collecting improvement ideas; and Kaizen is the appropriate method to support long-term and process-oriented improvements.Originality/value: This study is the first to specifically pairwise-compare the three Japanese improvement methods and to identify priorities of their key enablers in Sino-Japanese joint ventures.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to develop a better understanding of how Sino-Japanese joint ventures implemented the three Japanese improvement methods, i.e. Kaizen, Kaikaku and Kaizen Blitz. The specific objectives of this study are to identify the key enablers for the three improvement methods; and to identify the most selected improvement method.Design/methodology/approach: This study employs a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to pairwise-compare the three improvement methods. Data are collected from 28 industry experts from Sino-Japanese joint ventures. The study then adopts extent analysis approach for pairwise comparisons and extent analysis to obtain synthetic extent values for priority weights.Findings: The results of the study indicate that personnel (humanware) factor enablers are the most important factor for Kaizen, whilst software factor enablers (essential rules, policies and institutional arrangements) weight second and hardware factor enablers (physical, measurable hard facts or resources) weight last. The study also reviews that Kaizen is the most selected improvement method among the three.Research limitations/implications: The sample of this study is limited to Sino-Japanese ventures in Guangzhou, China. This study only identifies the key improvement enablers based on interviews with shop floor managers and improvement experts.Practical implications: Practical implications are threefold: the improvement implementations should be based on factors such as regular training, incentives for motivations and shop floor management; improvement methods are transferable and standard operations may only have small effects on collecting improvement ideas; and Kaizen is the appropriate method to support long-term and process-oriented improvements.Originality/value: This study is the first to specifically pairwise-compare the three Japanese improvement methods and to identify priorities of their key enablers in Sino-Japanese joint ventures.

KW - China

KW - Kaizen

KW - AHP

KW - Decision support

KW - Fuzzy

KW - Improvement methods

U2 - 10.1108/IJQRM-12-2015-0173

DO - 10.1108/IJQRM-12-2015-0173

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 549

EP - 568

JO - International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management

JF - International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management

SN - 0265-671X

IS - 4

ER -