Private or Institutional – Small or Big? Towards a Typology of Polyphonic Sources of Renaissance Music

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In contrast to the codicology of text manuscripts or liturgical manuscripts, a systematic typology of manuscript sources of Renaissance music is lacking. This article is a first attempt to develop criteria which could be relevant for such a typology. Function and performance context are obviously among such criteria, but so are size, material, and decoration. By combining all textual and contextual parameters into a table and discussing the results, it becomes clear that no single criterion is sufficient to define a certain type of manuscript: institutional manuscripts can be big or small, lavish or simple; manuscripts whose primary function appears to be representation (rather than practical use) can range from enormous choirbooks to tiny chansonniers, from highly private to highly public objects; finally, there are books whose external appearance provides little or no clue as to what their function may have been. A Quellenkunde of the polyphonic manuscript has yet to be written.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)13-26
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of the Alamire Foundation
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Music
Polyphonic
Manuscripts
Choirbooks
Contextual
Codicology
Decoration

Cite this

@article{1909938de91d44a7ac850309d67c4b2f,
title = "Private or Institutional – Small or Big? Towards a Typology of Polyphonic Sources of Renaissance Music",
abstract = "In contrast to the codicology of text manuscripts or liturgical manuscripts, a systematic typology of manuscript sources of Renaissance music is lacking. This article is a first attempt to develop criteria which could be relevant for such a typology. Function and performance context are obviously among such criteria, but so are size, material, and decoration. By combining all textual and contextual parameters into a table and discussing the results, it becomes clear that no single criterion is sufficient to define a certain type of manuscript: institutional manuscripts can be big or small, lavish or simple; manuscripts whose primary function appears to be representation (rather than practical use) can range from enormous choirbooks to tiny chansonniers, from highly private to highly public objects; finally, there are books whose external appearance provides little or no clue as to what their function may have been. A Quellenkunde of the polyphonic manuscript has yet to be written.",
author = "Thomas Schmidt-Beste",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1484/J.JAF.1.100437",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "13--26",
journal = "Journal of the Alamire Foundation",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Private or Institutional – Small or Big? Towards a Typology of Polyphonic Sources of Renaissance Music

AU - Schmidt-Beste, Thomas

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - In contrast to the codicology of text manuscripts or liturgical manuscripts, a systematic typology of manuscript sources of Renaissance music is lacking. This article is a first attempt to develop criteria which could be relevant for such a typology. Function and performance context are obviously among such criteria, but so are size, material, and decoration. By combining all textual and contextual parameters into a table and discussing the results, it becomes clear that no single criterion is sufficient to define a certain type of manuscript: institutional manuscripts can be big or small, lavish or simple; manuscripts whose primary function appears to be representation (rather than practical use) can range from enormous choirbooks to tiny chansonniers, from highly private to highly public objects; finally, there are books whose external appearance provides little or no clue as to what their function may have been. A Quellenkunde of the polyphonic manuscript has yet to be written.

AB - In contrast to the codicology of text manuscripts or liturgical manuscripts, a systematic typology of manuscript sources of Renaissance music is lacking. This article is a first attempt to develop criteria which could be relevant for such a typology. Function and performance context are obviously among such criteria, but so are size, material, and decoration. By combining all textual and contextual parameters into a table and discussing the results, it becomes clear that no single criterion is sufficient to define a certain type of manuscript: institutional manuscripts can be big or small, lavish or simple; manuscripts whose primary function appears to be representation (rather than practical use) can range from enormous choirbooks to tiny chansonniers, from highly private to highly public objects; finally, there are books whose external appearance provides little or no clue as to what their function may have been. A Quellenkunde of the polyphonic manuscript has yet to be written.

U2 - 10.1484/J.JAF.1.100437

DO - 10.1484/J.JAF.1.100437

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 13

EP - 26

JO - Journal of the Alamire Foundation

JF - Journal of the Alamire Foundation

IS - 1

ER -