'Problematics of Government', (post) modernity and social work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

122 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Summary: This paper attempts to locate contemporary developments and tensions in social work within current debates in social theory concerning the problematics of government and (post) modernity. It argues that modern social work emerged in a period of 'welfarism' which has now passed and that as a consequence social work has not simply been restructured in the era of neo-liberalism but is exposed as an activity particularly concerned with managing family life via the exercising of moral judgements and negotiating responsibilities. As a consequence the essential ambiguities of social work are more self evident than previously, and rather than constituting problems to be overcome, articulate the central elements of what it is to do social work. The article concludes by, tentatively, outlining the implications of such an analysis and how it may help us to understand what is going on and how we might proceed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9-32
Number of pages24
JournalBritish Journal of Social Work
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Social Work
modernity
social work
moral judgement
Negotiating
Politics
neoliberalism
responsibility

Cite this

@article{4152fee00b2946d3ad06c2e7e1c70822,
title = "'Problematics of Government', (post) modernity and social work",
abstract = "Summary: This paper attempts to locate contemporary developments and tensions in social work within current debates in social theory concerning the problematics of government and (post) modernity. It argues that modern social work emerged in a period of 'welfarism' which has now passed and that as a consequence social work has not simply been restructured in the era of neo-liberalism but is exposed as an activity particularly concerned with managing family life via the exercising of moral judgements and negotiating responsibilities. As a consequence the essential ambiguities of social work are more self evident than previously, and rather than constituting problems to be overcome, articulate the central elements of what it is to do social work. The article concludes by, tentatively, outlining the implications of such an analysis and how it may help us to understand what is going on and how we might proceed.",
author = "Nigel Parton",
year = "1994",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjsw.a056043",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "9--32",
journal = "British Journal of Social Work",
issn = "0045-3102",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

'Problematics of Government', (post) modernity and social work. / Parton, Nigel.

In: British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 24, No. 1, 01.02.1994, p. 9-32.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'Problematics of Government', (post) modernity and social work

AU - Parton, Nigel

PY - 1994/2/1

Y1 - 1994/2/1

N2 - Summary: This paper attempts to locate contemporary developments and tensions in social work within current debates in social theory concerning the problematics of government and (post) modernity. It argues that modern social work emerged in a period of 'welfarism' which has now passed and that as a consequence social work has not simply been restructured in the era of neo-liberalism but is exposed as an activity particularly concerned with managing family life via the exercising of moral judgements and negotiating responsibilities. As a consequence the essential ambiguities of social work are more self evident than previously, and rather than constituting problems to be overcome, articulate the central elements of what it is to do social work. The article concludes by, tentatively, outlining the implications of such an analysis and how it may help us to understand what is going on and how we might proceed.

AB - Summary: This paper attempts to locate contemporary developments and tensions in social work within current debates in social theory concerning the problematics of government and (post) modernity. It argues that modern social work emerged in a period of 'welfarism' which has now passed and that as a consequence social work has not simply been restructured in the era of neo-liberalism but is exposed as an activity particularly concerned with managing family life via the exercising of moral judgements and negotiating responsibilities. As a consequence the essential ambiguities of social work are more self evident than previously, and rather than constituting problems to be overcome, articulate the central elements of what it is to do social work. The article concludes by, tentatively, outlining the implications of such an analysis and how it may help us to understand what is going on and how we might proceed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0039965644&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjsw.a056043

DO - 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjsw.a056043

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 9

EP - 32

JO - British Journal of Social Work

JF - British Journal of Social Work

SN - 0045-3102

IS - 1

ER -