Psychometric tests as a measure of Personality:: A Critical Assessment of Trait versus Situationalist Positions and the NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R)

Dominic Willmott, Dara Mojtahedi, Saskia Ryan, Nicole Sherretts, Olivia Simpson, Themba Dlamini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Over time, the concept of personality has stimulated considerable theorising and debate amongst researchers. Thought to be characteristics within an individual that account for consistent patterns of thought, feelings and behaviours, the quest to understand individual differences between human beings has led to the increased uptake of psychological measurement tools, known as psychometric tests. Many variations of psychometric tests that have been devised to date attempt to operationalise the theoretical principles
of Trait theory and the dimensions therein. Typically, these are applied within occupational, educational and clinical settings, where such personality measures are considered increasingly useful in the evaluation of individuals either being assessed, or due to begin working within an organisation. However, despite researchers implementing psychometric tests such as the NEO Personality Inventory [1] reporting high levels of construct validity for the measure [2], criticism surrounding the reliability of findings obtained from applications of the tool, resulting from the general lack of agreement around the trait dimensions that underpin psychometric testing, remain important. Another highly contested issue surrounding the basis of such tests are the stability and situationalist arguments, which criticise such methods as inaccurately representing a true picture of the individual due to failing to take the full environmental influences upon people into account. Such issues are undoubtedly more complex than such a summarisation can accredit, and upon paying systematic and critical consideration to the related assessments, a greater depth of analysis may be drawn.
LanguageEnglish
Pages13-18
Number of pages6
JournalEC Psychology and Psychiatry
Volume3
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 28 Mar 2017

Fingerprint

psychometrics
personality
construct validity
criticism
human being
lack
evaluation

Cite this

@article{6c0069f5c31a45ba934249d3ead3e464,
title = "Psychometric tests as a measure of Personality:: A Critical Assessment of Trait versus Situationalist Positions and the NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R)",
abstract = "Over time, the concept of personality has stimulated considerable theorising and debate amongst researchers. Thought to be characteristics within an individual that account for consistent patterns of thought, feelings and behaviours, the quest to understand individual differences between human beings has led to the increased uptake of psychological measurement tools, known as psychometric tests. Many variations of psychometric tests that have been devised to date attempt to operationalise the theoretical principlesof Trait theory and the dimensions therein. Typically, these are applied within occupational, educational and clinical settings, where such personality measures are considered increasingly useful in the evaluation of individuals either being assessed, or due to begin working within an organisation. However, despite researchers implementing psychometric tests such as the NEO Personality Inventory [1] reporting high levels of construct validity for the measure [2], criticism surrounding the reliability of findings obtained from applications of the tool, resulting from the general lack of agreement around the trait dimensions that underpin psychometric testing, remain important. Another highly contested issue surrounding the basis of such tests are the stability and situationalist arguments, which criticise such methods as inaccurately representing a true picture of the individual due to failing to take the full environmental influences upon people into account. Such issues are undoubtedly more complex than such a summarisation can accredit, and upon paying systematic and critical consideration to the related assessments, a greater depth of analysis may be drawn.",
keywords = "Psychometrics, Personality Inventory, NEO-PI, Neuroticism, Personality Traits",
author = "Dominic Willmott and Dara Mojtahedi and Saskia Ryan and Nicole Sherretts and Olivia Simpson and Themba Dlamini",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "28",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "13--18",
journal = "EC Psychology and Psychiatry",
number = "1",

}

Psychometric tests as a measure of Personality: A Critical Assessment of Trait versus Situationalist Positions and the NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R). / Willmott, Dominic; Mojtahedi, Dara; Ryan, Saskia; Sherretts, Nicole; Simpson, Olivia; Dlamini, Themba.

In: EC Psychology and Psychiatry, Vol. 3, No. 1, 28.03.2017, p. 13-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychometric tests as a measure of Personality:

T2 - EC Psychology and Psychiatry

AU - Willmott, Dominic

AU - Mojtahedi, Dara

AU - Ryan, Saskia

AU - Sherretts, Nicole

AU - Simpson, Olivia

AU - Dlamini, Themba

PY - 2017/3/28

Y1 - 2017/3/28

N2 - Over time, the concept of personality has stimulated considerable theorising and debate amongst researchers. Thought to be characteristics within an individual that account for consistent patterns of thought, feelings and behaviours, the quest to understand individual differences between human beings has led to the increased uptake of psychological measurement tools, known as psychometric tests. Many variations of psychometric tests that have been devised to date attempt to operationalise the theoretical principlesof Trait theory and the dimensions therein. Typically, these are applied within occupational, educational and clinical settings, where such personality measures are considered increasingly useful in the evaluation of individuals either being assessed, or due to begin working within an organisation. However, despite researchers implementing psychometric tests such as the NEO Personality Inventory [1] reporting high levels of construct validity for the measure [2], criticism surrounding the reliability of findings obtained from applications of the tool, resulting from the general lack of agreement around the trait dimensions that underpin psychometric testing, remain important. Another highly contested issue surrounding the basis of such tests are the stability and situationalist arguments, which criticise such methods as inaccurately representing a true picture of the individual due to failing to take the full environmental influences upon people into account. Such issues are undoubtedly more complex than such a summarisation can accredit, and upon paying systematic and critical consideration to the related assessments, a greater depth of analysis may be drawn.

AB - Over time, the concept of personality has stimulated considerable theorising and debate amongst researchers. Thought to be characteristics within an individual that account for consistent patterns of thought, feelings and behaviours, the quest to understand individual differences between human beings has led to the increased uptake of psychological measurement tools, known as psychometric tests. Many variations of psychometric tests that have been devised to date attempt to operationalise the theoretical principlesof Trait theory and the dimensions therein. Typically, these are applied within occupational, educational and clinical settings, where such personality measures are considered increasingly useful in the evaluation of individuals either being assessed, or due to begin working within an organisation. However, despite researchers implementing psychometric tests such as the NEO Personality Inventory [1] reporting high levels of construct validity for the measure [2], criticism surrounding the reliability of findings obtained from applications of the tool, resulting from the general lack of agreement around the trait dimensions that underpin psychometric testing, remain important. Another highly contested issue surrounding the basis of such tests are the stability and situationalist arguments, which criticise such methods as inaccurately representing a true picture of the individual due to failing to take the full environmental influences upon people into account. Such issues are undoubtedly more complex than such a summarisation can accredit, and upon paying systematic and critical consideration to the related assessments, a greater depth of analysis may be drawn.

KW - Psychometrics

KW - Personality Inventory

KW - NEO-PI, Neuroticism

KW - Personality Traits

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 13

EP - 18

JO - EC Psychology and Psychiatry

JF - EC Psychology and Psychiatry

IS - 1

ER -