Psychosocial Predictors of Outcome in Acute and Subchronic Low Back Trouble

A. Kim Burton, K. Malcolm Tillotson, Chris J. Main, Sally Hollis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

541 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design. A prospective survey of patients seeking primary care for low back pain. Clinical and psychosocial data, available at presentation, were explored for predictors of outcome at 1 year. Objectives. To determine the relative value of clinical and psychosocial variables for early identification of patients with a poor prognosis. Summary of Background Data. Current treatment strategies for low back pain have failed to stem the rising levels of disability. Psychosocial factors have been shown to be important determinants of response to therapy in chronic patients, but the contribution from similar data in acute or subchronic patients has not been comprehensively investigated. Methods. Two hundred fifty-two patients with low back pain, presenting to primary care, underwent a structured clinical interview and completed a battery of psychosocial instruments. Follow-up was done by mail at 1 year; outcome was measured using a back pain disability questionnaire. Predictive relationships were sought between the data at presentation and disability at follow-up. Results. Most patients showed improved disability and pain scores, although more than half had persisting symptoms. Eighteen percent showed significant psychological distress at presentation. Multiple regression analysis showed the level of persisting disability to depend principally on measures in the psychosocial domain; for acute cases outcome is also dependent on the absence or presence of a previous history of low back trouble. Discriminant models successfully allocated typically 76% of cases to recovered/not-recovered groups, largely on the basis of psychosocial factors evident at presentation. Conclusions. Early identification of psychosocial problems is important in understanding, and hopefully preventing, the progression to chronicity in low back trouble.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)722-728
Number of pages7
JournalSpine
Volume20
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Mar 1995

Fingerprint

Low Back Pain
Psychology
Primary Health Care
Postal Service
Back Pain
Regression Analysis
Interviews
Pain
Therapeutics
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

Burton, A. Kim ; Tillotson, K. Malcolm ; Main, Chris J. ; Hollis, Sally. / Psychosocial Predictors of Outcome in Acute and Subchronic Low Back Trouble. In: Spine. 1995 ; Vol. 20, No. 6. pp. 722-728.
@article{2d92ad77522246d48c79bc292e1455dd,
title = "Psychosocial Predictors of Outcome in Acute and Subchronic Low Back Trouble",
abstract = "Study Design. A prospective survey of patients seeking primary care for low back pain. Clinical and psychosocial data, available at presentation, were explored for predictors of outcome at 1 year. Objectives. To determine the relative value of clinical and psychosocial variables for early identification of patients with a poor prognosis. Summary of Background Data. Current treatment strategies for low back pain have failed to stem the rising levels of disability. Psychosocial factors have been shown to be important determinants of response to therapy in chronic patients, but the contribution from similar data in acute or subchronic patients has not been comprehensively investigated. Methods. Two hundred fifty-two patients with low back pain, presenting to primary care, underwent a structured clinical interview and completed a battery of psychosocial instruments. Follow-up was done by mail at 1 year; outcome was measured using a back pain disability questionnaire. Predictive relationships were sought between the data at presentation and disability at follow-up. Results. Most patients showed improved disability and pain scores, although more than half had persisting symptoms. Eighteen percent showed significant psychological distress at presentation. Multiple regression analysis showed the level of persisting disability to depend principally on measures in the psychosocial domain; for acute cases outcome is also dependent on the absence or presence of a previous history of low back trouble. Discriminant models successfully allocated typically 76{\%} of cases to recovered/not-recovered groups, largely on the basis of psychosocial factors evident at presentation. Conclusions. Early identification of psychosocial problems is important in understanding, and hopefully preventing, the progression to chronicity in low back trouble.",
keywords = "Disability rating, Low back trouble, Outcome, Pain, Predictors, Psychological, Psychosocial",
author = "Burton, {A. Kim} and Tillotson, {K. Malcolm} and Main, {Chris J.} and Sally Hollis",
year = "1995",
month = "3",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1097/00007632-199503150-00014",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "722--728",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

Psychosocial Predictors of Outcome in Acute and Subchronic Low Back Trouble. / Burton, A. Kim; Tillotson, K. Malcolm; Main, Chris J.; Hollis, Sally.

In: Spine, Vol. 20, No. 6, 15.03.1995, p. 722-728.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychosocial Predictors of Outcome in Acute and Subchronic Low Back Trouble

AU - Burton, A. Kim

AU - Tillotson, K. Malcolm

AU - Main, Chris J.

AU - Hollis, Sally

PY - 1995/3/15

Y1 - 1995/3/15

N2 - Study Design. A prospective survey of patients seeking primary care for low back pain. Clinical and psychosocial data, available at presentation, were explored for predictors of outcome at 1 year. Objectives. To determine the relative value of clinical and psychosocial variables for early identification of patients with a poor prognosis. Summary of Background Data. Current treatment strategies for low back pain have failed to stem the rising levels of disability. Psychosocial factors have been shown to be important determinants of response to therapy in chronic patients, but the contribution from similar data in acute or subchronic patients has not been comprehensively investigated. Methods. Two hundred fifty-two patients with low back pain, presenting to primary care, underwent a structured clinical interview and completed a battery of psychosocial instruments. Follow-up was done by mail at 1 year; outcome was measured using a back pain disability questionnaire. Predictive relationships were sought between the data at presentation and disability at follow-up. Results. Most patients showed improved disability and pain scores, although more than half had persisting symptoms. Eighteen percent showed significant psychological distress at presentation. Multiple regression analysis showed the level of persisting disability to depend principally on measures in the psychosocial domain; for acute cases outcome is also dependent on the absence or presence of a previous history of low back trouble. Discriminant models successfully allocated typically 76% of cases to recovered/not-recovered groups, largely on the basis of psychosocial factors evident at presentation. Conclusions. Early identification of psychosocial problems is important in understanding, and hopefully preventing, the progression to chronicity in low back trouble.

AB - Study Design. A prospective survey of patients seeking primary care for low back pain. Clinical and psychosocial data, available at presentation, were explored for predictors of outcome at 1 year. Objectives. To determine the relative value of clinical and psychosocial variables for early identification of patients with a poor prognosis. Summary of Background Data. Current treatment strategies for low back pain have failed to stem the rising levels of disability. Psychosocial factors have been shown to be important determinants of response to therapy in chronic patients, but the contribution from similar data in acute or subchronic patients has not been comprehensively investigated. Methods. Two hundred fifty-two patients with low back pain, presenting to primary care, underwent a structured clinical interview and completed a battery of psychosocial instruments. Follow-up was done by mail at 1 year; outcome was measured using a back pain disability questionnaire. Predictive relationships were sought between the data at presentation and disability at follow-up. Results. Most patients showed improved disability and pain scores, although more than half had persisting symptoms. Eighteen percent showed significant psychological distress at presentation. Multiple regression analysis showed the level of persisting disability to depend principally on measures in the psychosocial domain; for acute cases outcome is also dependent on the absence or presence of a previous history of low back trouble. Discriminant models successfully allocated typically 76% of cases to recovered/not-recovered groups, largely on the basis of psychosocial factors evident at presentation. Conclusions. Early identification of psychosocial problems is important in understanding, and hopefully preventing, the progression to chronicity in low back trouble.

KW - Disability rating

KW - Low back trouble

KW - Outcome

KW - Pain

KW - Predictors

KW - Psychological

KW - Psychosocial

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028935004&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00007632-199503150-00014

DO - 10.1097/00007632-199503150-00014

M3 - Article

C2 - 7604349

AN - SCOPUS:0028935004

VL - 20

SP - 722

EP - 728

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 6

ER -