Public relations and evaluation

Does the reality match the rhetoric?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Over recent years there have been a number of initiatives for improving the quantity and quality of evaluation in public relations programmes. This has been partly because public relations practitioners wish to demonstrate their contribution, but also because, as expenditure on public relations grows (£3 billion worldwide by the end of 1999), clients and organizations are demanding to know that their money is being well-spent. To aid evaluation, a number of models have been developed. This paper critically analyses the most well-known and proposes a new context/objectives-driven model which combines aspects of previous models while refining and adding to them. Within this context, 25 UK award-winning public relations programmes were analysed in order to examine the types of evaluations they used. It was found that only 12 out of 103 evaluations used social science-based research methods for verifying their results. Fifty-one of the 103 evaluations measured programme impact with the other evaluations concentrated on programme outputs. The author found there were issues surrounding the framing of objectives which offered a partial explanation. A number of recommendations are made to programme specifiers and award competition organizers in order to help improve the quality of evaluations in the future.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)171-189
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Marketing Communications
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Public relations
Evaluation
Rhetoric
Research methods
Program evaluation
Social sciences
Expenditure

Cite this

@article{d732be75568646fcb855184f1f5f768d,
title = "Public relations and evaluation: Does the reality match the rhetoric?",
abstract = "Over recent years there have been a number of initiatives for improving the quantity and quality of evaluation in public relations programmes. This has been partly because public relations practitioners wish to demonstrate their contribution, but also because, as expenditure on public relations grows (£3 billion worldwide by the end of 1999), clients and organizations are demanding to know that their money is being well-spent. To aid evaluation, a number of models have been developed. This paper critically analyses the most well-known and proposes a new context/objectives-driven model which combines aspects of previous models while refining and adding to them. Within this context, 25 UK award-winning public relations programmes were analysed in order to examine the types of evaluations they used. It was found that only 12 out of 103 evaluations used social science-based research methods for verifying their results. Fifty-one of the 103 evaluations measured programme impact with the other evaluations concentrated on programme outputs. The author found there were issues surrounding the framing of objectives which offered a partial explanation. A number of recommendations are made to programme specifiers and award competition organizers in order to help improve the quality of evaluations in the future.",
keywords = "Context/objectives-driven, Evaluation, Impact, Outcome, Output",
author = "Anne Gregory",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1080/13527260122625",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "171--189",
journal = "Journal of Marketing Communications",
issn = "1352-7266",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Public relations and evaluation : Does the reality match the rhetoric? / Gregory, Anne.

In: Journal of Marketing Communications, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2001, p. 171-189.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public relations and evaluation

T2 - Does the reality match the rhetoric?

AU - Gregory, Anne

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Over recent years there have been a number of initiatives for improving the quantity and quality of evaluation in public relations programmes. This has been partly because public relations practitioners wish to demonstrate their contribution, but also because, as expenditure on public relations grows (£3 billion worldwide by the end of 1999), clients and organizations are demanding to know that their money is being well-spent. To aid evaluation, a number of models have been developed. This paper critically analyses the most well-known and proposes a new context/objectives-driven model which combines aspects of previous models while refining and adding to them. Within this context, 25 UK award-winning public relations programmes were analysed in order to examine the types of evaluations they used. It was found that only 12 out of 103 evaluations used social science-based research methods for verifying their results. Fifty-one of the 103 evaluations measured programme impact with the other evaluations concentrated on programme outputs. The author found there were issues surrounding the framing of objectives which offered a partial explanation. A number of recommendations are made to programme specifiers and award competition organizers in order to help improve the quality of evaluations in the future.

AB - Over recent years there have been a number of initiatives for improving the quantity and quality of evaluation in public relations programmes. This has been partly because public relations practitioners wish to demonstrate their contribution, but also because, as expenditure on public relations grows (£3 billion worldwide by the end of 1999), clients and organizations are demanding to know that their money is being well-spent. To aid evaluation, a number of models have been developed. This paper critically analyses the most well-known and proposes a new context/objectives-driven model which combines aspects of previous models while refining and adding to them. Within this context, 25 UK award-winning public relations programmes were analysed in order to examine the types of evaluations they used. It was found that only 12 out of 103 evaluations used social science-based research methods for verifying their results. Fifty-one of the 103 evaluations measured programme impact with the other evaluations concentrated on programme outputs. The author found there were issues surrounding the framing of objectives which offered a partial explanation. A number of recommendations are made to programme specifiers and award competition organizers in order to help improve the quality of evaluations in the future.

KW - Context/objectives-driven

KW - Evaluation

KW - Impact

KW - Outcome

KW - Output

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23844535718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13527260122625

DO - 10.1080/13527260122625

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 171

EP - 189

JO - Journal of Marketing Communications

JF - Journal of Marketing Communications

SN - 1352-7266

IS - 3

ER -