Putting graphic elicitation into practice: Tools and typologies for the use of participant-led diagrams in qualitative research interviews

Alison Bravington, Nigel King

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
63 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The use of diagrams to stimulate dialogue in research interviews, a
technique known as graphic elicitation, has burgeoned since the year 2000.
Reviews of the graphic elicitation literature have relied on the inconsistent
terminology currently used to index visual methods, and have so far drawn
only a partial picture of their use. Individual diagrams are seen as standalone
tools, often linked to particular disciplines, rather than as images
created from a toolbox of common elements which can be customized to
suit a research study. There is a need to examine participant-led
diagramming with a view to matching the common elements of diagrams
with the objectives of a research project. This article aims to provide an
overview of diagramming techniques used in qualitative data collection
with individual participants, to relate the features of diagrams to the
aspects of the social world they represent, and to suggest how to choose a
technique to suit a research question.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)506-523
Number of pages18
JournalQualitative Research
Volume19
Issue number5
Early online date19 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2019

Fingerprint

qualitative research
typology
interview
research project
dialogue
Qualitative Research
Diagrams
Research Interviews
literature
Research Projects
Social Worlds
Visual Methods
Qualitative Data

Cite this

@article{1c5b0a303b4c464faf61f29b0059ba64,
title = "Putting graphic elicitation into practice: Tools and typologies for the use of participant-led diagrams in qualitative research interviews",
abstract = "The use of diagrams to stimulate dialogue in research interviews, atechnique known as graphic elicitation, has burgeoned since the year 2000.Reviews of the graphic elicitation literature have relied on the inconsistentterminology currently used to index visual methods, and have so far drawnonly a partial picture of their use. Individual diagrams are seen as standalonetools, often linked to particular disciplines, rather than as imagescreated from a toolbox of common elements which can be customized tosuit a research study. There is a need to examine participant-leddiagramming with a view to matching the common elements of diagramswith the objectives of a research project. This article aims to provide anoverview of diagramming techniques used in qualitative data collectionwith individual participants, to relate the features of diagrams to theaspects of the social world they represent, and to suggest how to choose atechnique to suit a research question.",
keywords = "Arts-based methods, Data collection, Diagrams, Graphic elicitation, Interviewing, Participant-led diagramming, Qualitative methods, Stimulus material, Visual methods",
author = "Alison Bravington and Nigel King",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1468794118781718",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "506--523",
journal = "Qualitative Research",
issn = "1468-7941",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "5",

}

Putting graphic elicitation into practice : Tools and typologies for the use of participant-led diagrams in qualitative research interviews. / Bravington, Alison; King, Nigel.

In: Qualitative Research, Vol. 19, No. 5, 01.10.2019, p. 506-523.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Putting graphic elicitation into practice

T2 - Tools and typologies for the use of participant-led diagrams in qualitative research interviews

AU - Bravington, Alison

AU - King, Nigel

PY - 2019/10/1

Y1 - 2019/10/1

N2 - The use of diagrams to stimulate dialogue in research interviews, atechnique known as graphic elicitation, has burgeoned since the year 2000.Reviews of the graphic elicitation literature have relied on the inconsistentterminology currently used to index visual methods, and have so far drawnonly a partial picture of their use. Individual diagrams are seen as standalonetools, often linked to particular disciplines, rather than as imagescreated from a toolbox of common elements which can be customized tosuit a research study. There is a need to examine participant-leddiagramming with a view to matching the common elements of diagramswith the objectives of a research project. This article aims to provide anoverview of diagramming techniques used in qualitative data collectionwith individual participants, to relate the features of diagrams to theaspects of the social world they represent, and to suggest how to choose atechnique to suit a research question.

AB - The use of diagrams to stimulate dialogue in research interviews, atechnique known as graphic elicitation, has burgeoned since the year 2000.Reviews of the graphic elicitation literature have relied on the inconsistentterminology currently used to index visual methods, and have so far drawnonly a partial picture of their use. Individual diagrams are seen as standalonetools, often linked to particular disciplines, rather than as imagescreated from a toolbox of common elements which can be customized tosuit a research study. There is a need to examine participant-leddiagramming with a view to matching the common elements of diagramswith the objectives of a research project. This article aims to provide anoverview of diagramming techniques used in qualitative data collectionwith individual participants, to relate the features of diagrams to theaspects of the social world they represent, and to suggest how to choose atechnique to suit a research question.

KW - Arts-based methods

KW - Data collection

KW - Diagrams

KW - Graphic elicitation

KW - Interviewing

KW - Participant-led diagramming

KW - Qualitative methods

KW - Stimulus material

KW - Visual methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048834463&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1468794118781718

DO - 10.1177/1468794118781718

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 506

EP - 523

JO - Qualitative Research

JF - Qualitative Research

SN - 1468-7941

IS - 5

ER -