Putting Meta-Analysis to Work

Accountants' Organizational-Professional Conflict

John A. Brierley, Christopher Cowton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Commentators on empirical research in business ethics have recommended that use should be made of meta-analysis – the quantitative analysis of a group of research studies. This paper elaborates upon those recommendations by conducting, as a "case study" for further reflection, a meta-analysis of studies of accountants' organizational-professional conflict (OPC) previously published in accounting and psychology journals. Of five variables capable of analysis, only the population correlation coefficient between OPC and organizational tenure is identified. It was not possible to find the population correlation coefficient of the other four variables, for which several possible reasons are suggested. The paper then shows how meta-analysis can make a valuable contribution, even when the substantive findings are limited, by providing guidance for future research and a safeguard against the drawing of unjustified conclusions, to which the more usual narrative reviews of literature are prone.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)343-353
JournalJournal of Business Ethics
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Fingerprint

business ethics
empirical research
psychology
Accountants
Meta-analysis
narrative
Correlation coefficient
Correlation Coefficient
Group
Empirical research
Organizational tenure
Quantitative analysis
Safeguards
Business ethics
Psychology
Guidance
Conducting
Quantitative Analysis
Business Ethics
Tenure

Cite this

@article{dd2f2cc341f8464884fe7d084af96042,
title = "Putting Meta-Analysis to Work: Accountants' Organizational-Professional Conflict",
abstract = "Commentators on empirical research in business ethics have recommended that use should be made of meta-analysis – the quantitative analysis of a group of research studies. This paper elaborates upon those recommendations by conducting, as a {"}case study{"} for further reflection, a meta-analysis of studies of accountants' organizational-professional conflict (OPC) previously published in accounting and psychology journals. Of five variables capable of analysis, only the population correlation coefficient between OPC and organizational tenure is identified. It was not possible to find the population correlation coefficient of the other four variables, for which several possible reasons are suggested. The paper then shows how meta-analysis can make a valuable contribution, even when the substantive findings are limited, by providing guidance for future research and a safeguard against the drawing of unjustified conclusions, to which the more usual narrative reviews of literature are prone.",
keywords = "Reflection, Economic Growth, Quantitative Analysis, Research Study, Business Ethic",
author = "Brierley, {John A.} and Christopher Cowton",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1023/A:1006184625019",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "343--353",
journal = "Journal of Business Ethics",
issn = "0167-4544",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

Putting Meta-Analysis to Work : Accountants' Organizational-Professional Conflict. / Brierley, John A. ; Cowton, Christopher.

In: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 24, No. 4, 2000, p. 343-353.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Putting Meta-Analysis to Work

T2 - Accountants' Organizational-Professional Conflict

AU - Brierley, John A.

AU - Cowton, Christopher

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Commentators on empirical research in business ethics have recommended that use should be made of meta-analysis – the quantitative analysis of a group of research studies. This paper elaborates upon those recommendations by conducting, as a "case study" for further reflection, a meta-analysis of studies of accountants' organizational-professional conflict (OPC) previously published in accounting and psychology journals. Of five variables capable of analysis, only the population correlation coefficient between OPC and organizational tenure is identified. It was not possible to find the population correlation coefficient of the other four variables, for which several possible reasons are suggested. The paper then shows how meta-analysis can make a valuable contribution, even when the substantive findings are limited, by providing guidance for future research and a safeguard against the drawing of unjustified conclusions, to which the more usual narrative reviews of literature are prone.

AB - Commentators on empirical research in business ethics have recommended that use should be made of meta-analysis – the quantitative analysis of a group of research studies. This paper elaborates upon those recommendations by conducting, as a "case study" for further reflection, a meta-analysis of studies of accountants' organizational-professional conflict (OPC) previously published in accounting and psychology journals. Of five variables capable of analysis, only the population correlation coefficient between OPC and organizational tenure is identified. It was not possible to find the population correlation coefficient of the other four variables, for which several possible reasons are suggested. The paper then shows how meta-analysis can make a valuable contribution, even when the substantive findings are limited, by providing guidance for future research and a safeguard against the drawing of unjustified conclusions, to which the more usual narrative reviews of literature are prone.

KW - Reflection

KW - Economic Growth

KW - Quantitative Analysis

KW - Research Study

KW - Business Ethic

U2 - 10.1023/A:1006184625019

DO - 10.1023/A:1006184625019

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 343

EP - 353

JO - Journal of Business Ethics

JF - Journal of Business Ethics

SN - 0167-4544

IS - 4

ER -