Qualitative Research and Its Place in Health Research in Nepal

E. van Teijlingen, B. Simkhada, M. Porter, P. Simkhada, E. Pitchforth, P. Bhatta

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There has been a steady growth in recent decades in Nepal in health and health services research, much of it based on quantitative research methods. Over the same period international medical journals such as The Lancet, the British Medical Journal (BMJ), The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) and the Journal of Family Planning & Reproductive Health Care and many more have published methods papers outlining and promoting qualitative methods. This paper argues in favour of more high-quality qualitative research in Nepal, either on its own or as part of a mixed-methods approach, to help strengthen the country's research capacity. After outlining the reasons for using qualitative methods, we discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the three main approaches: (a) observation; (b) in-depth interviews; and (c) focus groups. We also discuss issues around sampling, analysis, presentation of findings, reflexivity of the qualitative researcher and theory building, and highlight some misconceptions about qualitative research and mistakes commonly made.

Original languageEnglish
Article number4
Pages (from-to)301-305
Number of pages5
JournalKathmandu University Medical Journal
Volume9
Issue number36
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Nepal
Qualitative Research
Health
Research
Health Services Research
Reproductive Health
Family Planning Services
American Medical Association
Focus Groups
Research Personnel
Observation
Interviews
Delivery of Health Care
Growth

Cite this

van Teijlingen, E., Simkhada, B., Porter, M., Simkhada, P., Pitchforth, E., & Bhatta, P. (2011). Qualitative Research and Its Place in Health Research in Nepal. Kathmandu University Medical Journal, 9(36), 301-305. [4]. https://doi.org/10.3126/kumj.v9i4.6350
van Teijlingen, E. ; Simkhada, B. ; Porter, M. ; Simkhada, P. ; Pitchforth, E. ; Bhatta, P. / Qualitative Research and Its Place in Health Research in Nepal. In: Kathmandu University Medical Journal. 2011 ; Vol. 9, No. 36. pp. 301-305.
@article{b86cb516f0734101af3e5acecdc38fd9,
title = "Qualitative Research and Its Place in Health Research in Nepal",
abstract = "There has been a steady growth in recent decades in Nepal in health and health services research, much of it based on quantitative research methods. Over the same period international medical journals such as The Lancet, the British Medical Journal (BMJ), The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) and the Journal of Family Planning & Reproductive Health Care and many more have published methods papers outlining and promoting qualitative methods. This paper argues in favour of more high-quality qualitative research in Nepal, either on its own or as part of a mixed-methods approach, to help strengthen the country's research capacity. After outlining the reasons for using qualitative methods, we discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the three main approaches: (a) observation; (b) in-depth interviews; and (c) focus groups. We also discuss issues around sampling, analysis, presentation of findings, reflexivity of the qualitative researcher and theory building, and highlight some misconceptions about qualitative research and mistakes commonly made.",
keywords = "health research, qualitative research, Nepal",
author = "{van Teijlingen}, E. and B. Simkhada and M. Porter and P. Simkhada and E. Pitchforth and P. Bhatta",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
doi = "10.3126/kumj.v9i4.6350",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "301--305",
journal = "Kathmandu University Medical Journal",
issn = "1812-2027",
publisher = "Kathmandu University",
number = "36",

}

van Teijlingen, E, Simkhada, B, Porter, M, Simkhada, P, Pitchforth, E & Bhatta, P 2011, 'Qualitative Research and Its Place in Health Research in Nepal', Kathmandu University Medical Journal, vol. 9, no. 36, 4, pp. 301-305. https://doi.org/10.3126/kumj.v9i4.6350

Qualitative Research and Its Place in Health Research in Nepal. / van Teijlingen, E.; Simkhada, B.; Porter, M.; Simkhada, P.; Pitchforth, E.; Bhatta, P.

In: Kathmandu University Medical Journal, Vol. 9, No. 36, 4, 10.2011, p. 301-305.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Qualitative Research and Its Place in Health Research in Nepal

AU - van Teijlingen, E.

AU - Simkhada, B.

AU - Porter, M.

AU - Simkhada, P.

AU - Pitchforth, E.

AU - Bhatta, P.

PY - 2011/10

Y1 - 2011/10

N2 - There has been a steady growth in recent decades in Nepal in health and health services research, much of it based on quantitative research methods. Over the same period international medical journals such as The Lancet, the British Medical Journal (BMJ), The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) and the Journal of Family Planning & Reproductive Health Care and many more have published methods papers outlining and promoting qualitative methods. This paper argues in favour of more high-quality qualitative research in Nepal, either on its own or as part of a mixed-methods approach, to help strengthen the country's research capacity. After outlining the reasons for using qualitative methods, we discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the three main approaches: (a) observation; (b) in-depth interviews; and (c) focus groups. We also discuss issues around sampling, analysis, presentation of findings, reflexivity of the qualitative researcher and theory building, and highlight some misconceptions about qualitative research and mistakes commonly made.

AB - There has been a steady growth in recent decades in Nepal in health and health services research, much of it based on quantitative research methods. Over the same period international medical journals such as The Lancet, the British Medical Journal (BMJ), The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) and the Journal of Family Planning & Reproductive Health Care and many more have published methods papers outlining and promoting qualitative methods. This paper argues in favour of more high-quality qualitative research in Nepal, either on its own or as part of a mixed-methods approach, to help strengthen the country's research capacity. After outlining the reasons for using qualitative methods, we discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the three main approaches: (a) observation; (b) in-depth interviews; and (c) focus groups. We also discuss issues around sampling, analysis, presentation of findings, reflexivity of the qualitative researcher and theory building, and highlight some misconceptions about qualitative research and mistakes commonly made.

KW - health research

KW - qualitative research

KW - Nepal

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862282809&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3126/kumj.v9i4.6350

DO - 10.3126/kumj.v9i4.6350

M3 - Review article

C2 - 22710544

AN - SCOPUS:84862282809

VL - 9

SP - 301

EP - 305

JO - Kathmandu University Medical Journal

JF - Kathmandu University Medical Journal

SN - 1812-2027

IS - 36

M1 - 4

ER -