Radicalisation and higher education

Students’ understanding and experiences

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since 2015 universities have been placed under a legal duty of “due regard to prevent people from being drawn into terrorism.”1 This reflects the belief in UK counter-terrorism policy that radicalisation exists and can be countered. Advice to universities is largely silent on how this duty applies to teaching. Yet many degree programmes generate lectures and seminar discussions where views of an allegedly radicalised nature could be aired. This article presents focus group research which elicits students’ understanding of radicalisation, and provides insights into their experience of debating contentious issues such as identity, community cohesion, and the causes of terrorism. We argue that students’ understanding of radicalisation is conflated with extremism and we explore students’ anxiety about debating these issues and reliance on educators to create the right environment for such discussions. Finally, the data presented here challenges some of the assumptions underpinning contemporary counter-radicalisation policy in the domain of higher education, which are premised on ideas of active grooming. We argue that this does not accord with students’ own experiences, as they regard themselves as discerning, critical thinkers rather than inherently vulnerable to manipulation by those espousing violent extremist views.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)559-576
Number of pages18
JournalTerrorism and Political Violence
Volume31
Issue number3
Early online date5 Dec 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 May 2019

Fingerprint

radicalization
Education
Students
Terrorism
terrorism
education
experience
student
university
radicalism
Technical presentations
group cohesion
manipulation
Teaching
educator
anxiety
cause
community
Group

Cite this

@article{010c41ce33a24aa09309e1668000cab8,
title = "Radicalisation and higher education: Students’ understanding and experiences",
abstract = "Since 2015 universities have been placed under a legal duty of “due regard to prevent people from being drawn into terrorism.”1 This reflects the belief in UK counter-terrorism policy that radicalisation exists and can be countered. Advice to universities is largely silent on how this duty applies to teaching. Yet many degree programmes generate lectures and seminar discussions where views of an allegedly radicalised nature could be aired. This article presents focus group research which elicits students’ understanding of radicalisation, and provides insights into their experience of debating contentious issues such as identity, community cohesion, and the causes of terrorism. We argue that students’ understanding of radicalisation is conflated with extremism and we explore students’ anxiety about debating these issues and reliance on educators to create the right environment for such discussions. Finally, the data presented here challenges some of the assumptions underpinning contemporary counter-radicalisation policy in the domain of higher education, which are premised on ideas of active grooming. We argue that this does not accord with students’ own experiences, as they regard themselves as discerning, critical thinkers rather than inherently vulnerable to manipulation by those espousing violent extremist views.",
keywords = "Counter-terrorism, education, Islam, radicalisation, UK, Education, Radicalisation",
author = "Catherine McGlynn and Shaun McDaid",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/09546553.2016.1258637",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "559--576",
journal = "Terrorism and Political Violence",
issn = "0954-6553",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Radicalisation and higher education : Students’ understanding and experiences. / McGlynn, Catherine; McDaid, Shaun.

In: Terrorism and Political Violence, Vol. 31, No. 3, 04.05.2019, p. 559-576.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Radicalisation and higher education

T2 - Students’ understanding and experiences

AU - McGlynn, Catherine

AU - McDaid, Shaun

PY - 2019/5/4

Y1 - 2019/5/4

N2 - Since 2015 universities have been placed under a legal duty of “due regard to prevent people from being drawn into terrorism.”1 This reflects the belief in UK counter-terrorism policy that radicalisation exists and can be countered. Advice to universities is largely silent on how this duty applies to teaching. Yet many degree programmes generate lectures and seminar discussions where views of an allegedly radicalised nature could be aired. This article presents focus group research which elicits students’ understanding of radicalisation, and provides insights into their experience of debating contentious issues such as identity, community cohesion, and the causes of terrorism. We argue that students’ understanding of radicalisation is conflated with extremism and we explore students’ anxiety about debating these issues and reliance on educators to create the right environment for such discussions. Finally, the data presented here challenges some of the assumptions underpinning contemporary counter-radicalisation policy in the domain of higher education, which are premised on ideas of active grooming. We argue that this does not accord with students’ own experiences, as they regard themselves as discerning, critical thinkers rather than inherently vulnerable to manipulation by those espousing violent extremist views.

AB - Since 2015 universities have been placed under a legal duty of “due regard to prevent people from being drawn into terrorism.”1 This reflects the belief in UK counter-terrorism policy that radicalisation exists and can be countered. Advice to universities is largely silent on how this duty applies to teaching. Yet many degree programmes generate lectures and seminar discussions where views of an allegedly radicalised nature could be aired. This article presents focus group research which elicits students’ understanding of radicalisation, and provides insights into their experience of debating contentious issues such as identity, community cohesion, and the causes of terrorism. We argue that students’ understanding of radicalisation is conflated with extremism and we explore students’ anxiety about debating these issues and reliance on educators to create the right environment for such discussions. Finally, the data presented here challenges some of the assumptions underpinning contemporary counter-radicalisation policy in the domain of higher education, which are premised on ideas of active grooming. We argue that this does not accord with students’ own experiences, as they regard themselves as discerning, critical thinkers rather than inherently vulnerable to manipulation by those espousing violent extremist views.

KW - Counter-terrorism

KW - education

KW - Islam

KW - radicalisation

KW - UK

KW - Education

KW - Radicalisation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85002262301&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09546553.2016.1258637

DO - 10.1080/09546553.2016.1258637

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 559

EP - 576

JO - Terrorism and Political Violence

JF - Terrorism and Political Violence

SN - 0954-6553

IS - 3

ER -