Rail freight in 2035 - Traction energy analysis for high-performance freight trains

Andreas Hoffrichter, Joseph Silmon, Simon Iwnicki, Stuart Hillmansen, Clive Roberts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper provides a comparison of the energy consumption and carbon emissions of rail and road vehicles for two routes. The scenarios considered are a high running speed container train, in locomotive hauled and electrical multiple unit (EMU) configuration, and a converted passenger EMU for pallets, as well as the corresponding road heavy goods vehicles. The container route is over the UK's East Coast Main Line and the pallet route is from London to the border with Scotland. The well-to-wheel 2008 and projected 2035 energy figures and carbon emissions are determined. It is demonstrated that, despite higher running speeds, a modal shift to rail reduces carbon emissions. The higher speed results in a more flexible path allocation for freight trains, enabling more attractive and flexible offers to shippers, therefore encouraging modal shift. The particular advantage of rail in hauling large volumes of cargo is highlighted, particularly if locomotives are used for traction. © IMechE 2012.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)568-574
Number of pages7
JournalProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
Volume226
Issue number6
Early online date28 Mar 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Rails
Pallets
Locomotives
Carbon
Containers
Traction (friction)
Coastal zones
Wheels
Energy utilization

Cite this

@article{97b5ed82270445dda9f0b6cd7b90d7b9,
title = "Rail freight in 2035 - Traction energy analysis for high-performance freight trains",
abstract = "This paper provides a comparison of the energy consumption and carbon emissions of rail and road vehicles for two routes. The scenarios considered are a high running speed container train, in locomotive hauled and electrical multiple unit (EMU) configuration, and a converted passenger EMU for pallets, as well as the corresponding road heavy goods vehicles. The container route is over the UK's East Coast Main Line and the pallet route is from London to the border with Scotland. The well-to-wheel 2008 and projected 2035 energy figures and carbon emissions are determined. It is demonstrated that, despite higher running speeds, a modal shift to rail reduces carbon emissions. The higher speed results in a more flexible path allocation for freight trains, enabling more attractive and flexible offers to shippers, therefore encouraging modal shift. The particular advantage of rail in hauling large volumes of cargo is highlighted, particularly if locomotives are used for traction. {\circledC} IMechE 2012.",
keywords = "CO emissions 2, freight electrical multiple unit, freight rail traction energy, High-speed rail freight, road - rail comparison",
author = "Andreas Hoffrichter and Joseph Silmon and Simon Iwnicki and Stuart Hillmansen and Clive Roberts",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0954409712441753",
language = "English",
volume = "226",
pages = "568--574",
journal = "Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit",
issn = "0954-4097",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "6",

}

Rail freight in 2035 - Traction energy analysis for high-performance freight trains. / Hoffrichter, Andreas; Silmon, Joseph; Iwnicki, Simon; Hillmansen, Stuart; Roberts, Clive.

In: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, Vol. 226, No. 6, 01.11.2012, p. 568-574.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rail freight in 2035 - Traction energy analysis for high-performance freight trains

AU - Hoffrichter, Andreas

AU - Silmon, Joseph

AU - Iwnicki, Simon

AU - Hillmansen, Stuart

AU - Roberts, Clive

PY - 2012/11/1

Y1 - 2012/11/1

N2 - This paper provides a comparison of the energy consumption and carbon emissions of rail and road vehicles for two routes. The scenarios considered are a high running speed container train, in locomotive hauled and electrical multiple unit (EMU) configuration, and a converted passenger EMU for pallets, as well as the corresponding road heavy goods vehicles. The container route is over the UK's East Coast Main Line and the pallet route is from London to the border with Scotland. The well-to-wheel 2008 and projected 2035 energy figures and carbon emissions are determined. It is demonstrated that, despite higher running speeds, a modal shift to rail reduces carbon emissions. The higher speed results in a more flexible path allocation for freight trains, enabling more attractive and flexible offers to shippers, therefore encouraging modal shift. The particular advantage of rail in hauling large volumes of cargo is highlighted, particularly if locomotives are used for traction. © IMechE 2012.

AB - This paper provides a comparison of the energy consumption and carbon emissions of rail and road vehicles for two routes. The scenarios considered are a high running speed container train, in locomotive hauled and electrical multiple unit (EMU) configuration, and a converted passenger EMU for pallets, as well as the corresponding road heavy goods vehicles. The container route is over the UK's East Coast Main Line and the pallet route is from London to the border with Scotland. The well-to-wheel 2008 and projected 2035 energy figures and carbon emissions are determined. It is demonstrated that, despite higher running speeds, a modal shift to rail reduces carbon emissions. The higher speed results in a more flexible path allocation for freight trains, enabling more attractive and flexible offers to shippers, therefore encouraging modal shift. The particular advantage of rail in hauling large volumes of cargo is highlighted, particularly if locomotives are used for traction. © IMechE 2012.

KW - CO emissions 2

KW - freight electrical multiple unit

KW - freight rail traction energy

KW - High-speed rail freight

KW - road - rail comparison

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874593305&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0954409712441753

DO - 10.1177/0954409712441753

M3 - Article

VL - 226

SP - 568

EP - 574

JO - Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit

JF - Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit

SN - 0954-4097

IS - 6

ER -