Raising the age of compulsory education in England: A neet solution?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)


This paper problematises the official discourse of economic competitiveness and social inclusion used by the 2007 Education and Skills Bill to justify the proposal to extend compulsory participation in education and training in England to the age of 18. Comparisons are drawn between this attempt to raise the age of compulsion and previous attempts, which took place in a significantly different socio-economic context. It is argued that the needs of those most likely to be affected by the current proposal - young people not in education, employment or training (NEET) - are subordinated to the needs of an English economy that is increasingly based upon low-skill, low-pay work relations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)420-439
Number of pages20
JournalBritish Journal of Educational Studies
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2008


Dive into the research topics of 'Raising the age of compulsory education in England: A neet solution?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this