Abstract
This paper problematises the official discourse of economic competitiveness and social inclusion used by the 2007 Education and Skills Bill to justify the proposal to extend compulsory participation in education and training in England to the age of 18. Comparisons are drawn between this attempt to raise the age of compulsion and previous attempts, which took place in a significantly different socio-economic context. It is argued that the needs of those most likely to be affected by the current proposal - young people not in education, employment or training (NEET) - are subordinated to the needs of an English economy that is increasingly based upon low-skill, low-pay work relations.
| Language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages | 420-439 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | British Journal of Educational Studies |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2008 |
Fingerprint
Cite this
}
Raising the age of compulsory education in England : A neet solution? / Simmons, Robin.
In: British Journal of Educational Studies, Vol. 56, No. 4, 12.2008, p. 420-439.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - Raising the age of compulsory education in England
T2 - British Journal of Educational Studies
AU - Simmons, Robin
PY - 2008/12
Y1 - 2008/12
N2 - This paper problematises the official discourse of economic competitiveness and social inclusion used by the 2007 Education and Skills Bill to justify the proposal to extend compulsory participation in education and training in England to the age of 18. Comparisons are drawn between this attempt to raise the age of compulsion and previous attempts, which took place in a significantly different socio-economic context. It is argued that the needs of those most likely to be affected by the current proposal - young people not in education, employment or training (NEET) - are subordinated to the needs of an English economy that is increasingly based upon low-skill, low-pay work relations.
AB - This paper problematises the official discourse of economic competitiveness and social inclusion used by the 2007 Education and Skills Bill to justify the proposal to extend compulsory participation in education and training in England to the age of 18. Comparisons are drawn between this attempt to raise the age of compulsion and previous attempts, which took place in a significantly different socio-economic context. It is argued that the needs of those most likely to be affected by the current proposal - young people not in education, employment or training (NEET) - are subordinated to the needs of an English economy that is increasingly based upon low-skill, low-pay work relations.
KW - Compulsory education
KW - NEET
KW - School leaving age
KW - Social inclusion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57449117710&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-8527.2008.00417.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1467-8527.2008.00417.x
M3 - Article
VL - 56
SP - 420
EP - 439
JO - British Journal of Educational Studies
JF - British Journal of Educational Studies
SN - 0007-1005
IS - 4
ER -