TY - JOUR
T1 - Re-evaluating Loricate Choanoflagellate Phylogenetics
T2 - Molecular Evidence Points to the Paraphyly of Tectiform Species
AU - Carr, Martin
AU - Leadbeater, Barry S.c.
N1 - Funding Information:
This manuscript is dedicated in memoriam of Professor Bland Finlay FRS who throughout his research career made an outstanding contribution to ecological protistology. We thank two anonymous reviewers for their comments on the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s)
PY - 2022/12/1
Y1 - 2022/12/1
N2 - Lorica-bearing choanoflagellates belong to the order Acanthoecida, a taxon which has been consistently recovered as monophyletic in molecular phylogenies. Based upon differences in lorica development and morphology, as well as the presence or absence of a motile dispersal stage, species are labelled as either nudiform or tectiform. Whilst Acanthoecida is robustly resolved in molecular phylogenies, the placement of the root of the clade is less certain with two different positions identified in past studies. One recovered root has been placed between the nudiform family Acanthoecidae and the tectiform family Stephanoecidae. An alternative root placement falls within the tectiform species, recovering the monophyletic Acanthoecidae nested within a paraphyletic Stephanoecidae. Presented here is a 14-gene phylogeny, based upon nucleotide and amino acid sequences, which strongly supports tectiform paraphyly. The horizontal transfer of a ribosomal protein gene, from a possible SAR donor, into a subset of acanthoecid species provides further, independent, support for this root placement. Differing patterns of codon usage bias across the choanoflagellates are proposed as the cause of artefactual phylogenetic signals that lead to the recovery of tectiform monophyly.
AB - Lorica-bearing choanoflagellates belong to the order Acanthoecida, a taxon which has been consistently recovered as monophyletic in molecular phylogenies. Based upon differences in lorica development and morphology, as well as the presence or absence of a motile dispersal stage, species are labelled as either nudiform or tectiform. Whilst Acanthoecida is robustly resolved in molecular phylogenies, the placement of the root of the clade is less certain with two different positions identified in past studies. One recovered root has been placed between the nudiform family Acanthoecidae and the tectiform family Stephanoecidae. An alternative root placement falls within the tectiform species, recovering the monophyletic Acanthoecidae nested within a paraphyletic Stephanoecidae. Presented here is a 14-gene phylogeny, based upon nucleotide and amino acid sequences, which strongly supports tectiform paraphyly. The horizontal transfer of a ribosomal protein gene, from a possible SAR donor, into a subset of acanthoecid species provides further, independent, support for this root placement. Differing patterns of codon usage bias across the choanoflagellates are proposed as the cause of artefactual phylogenetic signals that lead to the recovery of tectiform monophyly.
KW - Acanthoecida
KW - Choanoflagellatea
KW - Codon usage bias
KW - Horizontal gene transfer
KW - Phylogenetic root
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140901611&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.protis.2022.125924
DO - 10.1016/j.protis.2022.125924
M3 - Article
VL - 173
JO - Protist
JF - Protist
SN - 1434-4610
IS - 6
M1 - 125924
ER -