Referral and management options for patients with chronic kidney disease

Perspectives of patients, generalists and specialists

Charlotte Wilson, Stephen M. Campbell, Karen A. Luker, Ann Louise Caress

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is increasing in prevalence and significance as a global public health issue. Appropriate management of CKD stages 3-4 in either generalist or specialist care is essential in order to slow disease progression. As various consulting options between services may be used, it is important to understand how patients and practitioners view these options. Objective: To elicit patient and practitioner views and preferences on the acceptability and appropriateness of referral practices and consulting options for CKD stage 3-4. Design: A mixed methods approach involving a semi-structured interview and structured rating exercise administered by telephone. Setting & participants: Adult (18+) patients with CKD stage 3-4 were recruited via their General Practitioner (GP). Practitioners were recruited from both general and specialist services. Results: Sixteen patients and twenty-two practitioners participated in the study between July and September, 2011. Both patients and practitioners preferred 'GP with access to a specialist' and least preferred 'Specialist Review'. Computer review and telephone review were acceptable to participants under certain conditions. Practitioners favoured generalist management of patients with CKD 3. Specialists recommended active discharge of patients with stabilised stage 4 back to generalist care. Both generalists and specialists strongly supported sharing patients' medical records via electronic consultation systems. Conclusion: Participants tended to prefer the current model of CKD management. Suggested improvements included; increasing the involvement of patients in referral and discharge decisions; improving the adequacy of information given to specialists on referral and encouraging further use of clinical guidelines in practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)325-334
Number of pages10
JournalHealth Expectations
Volume18
Issue number3
Early online date10 Dec 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Chronic Renal Insufficiency
Referral and Consultation
Telephone
General Practitioners
Patient Discharge
Electronic Health Records
Disease Management
Practice Guidelines
Disease Progression
Public Health
Interviews
Exercise

Cite this

@article{4a3229a67e4746f98103bc8ffe5863be,
title = "Referral and management options for patients with chronic kidney disease: Perspectives of patients, generalists and specialists",
abstract = "Background: Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is increasing in prevalence and significance as a global public health issue. Appropriate management of CKD stages 3-4 in either generalist or specialist care is essential in order to slow disease progression. As various consulting options between services may be used, it is important to understand how patients and practitioners view these options. Objective: To elicit patient and practitioner views and preferences on the acceptability and appropriateness of referral practices and consulting options for CKD stage 3-4. Design: A mixed methods approach involving a semi-structured interview and structured rating exercise administered by telephone. Setting & participants: Adult (18+) patients with CKD stage 3-4 were recruited via their General Practitioner (GP). Practitioners were recruited from both general and specialist services. Results: Sixteen patients and twenty-two practitioners participated in the study between July and September, 2011. Both patients and practitioners preferred 'GP with access to a specialist' and least preferred 'Specialist Review'. Computer review and telephone review were acceptable to participants under certain conditions. Practitioners favoured generalist management of patients with CKD 3. Specialists recommended active discharge of patients with stabilised stage 4 back to generalist care. Both generalists and specialists strongly supported sharing patients' medical records via electronic consultation systems. Conclusion: Participants tended to prefer the current model of CKD management. Suggested improvements included; increasing the involvement of patients in referral and discharge decisions; improving the adequacy of information given to specialists on referral and encouraging further use of clinical guidelines in practice.",
keywords = "Acceptability, Appropriateness, Chronic kidney disease, Generalist, Preference, Specialist",
author = "Charlotte Wilson and Campbell, {Stephen M.} and Luker, {Karen A.} and Caress, {Ann Louise}",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/hex.12025",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "325--334",
journal = "Health Expectations",
issn = "1369-6513",
publisher = "Wiley Open Access",
number = "3",

}

Referral and management options for patients with chronic kidney disease : Perspectives of patients, generalists and specialists. / Wilson, Charlotte; Campbell, Stephen M.; Luker, Karen A.; Caress, Ann Louise.

In: Health Expectations, Vol. 18, No. 3, 01.06.2015, p. 325-334.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Referral and management options for patients with chronic kidney disease

T2 - Perspectives of patients, generalists and specialists

AU - Wilson, Charlotte

AU - Campbell, Stephen M.

AU - Luker, Karen A.

AU - Caress, Ann Louise

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - Background: Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is increasing in prevalence and significance as a global public health issue. Appropriate management of CKD stages 3-4 in either generalist or specialist care is essential in order to slow disease progression. As various consulting options between services may be used, it is important to understand how patients and practitioners view these options. Objective: To elicit patient and practitioner views and preferences on the acceptability and appropriateness of referral practices and consulting options for CKD stage 3-4. Design: A mixed methods approach involving a semi-structured interview and structured rating exercise administered by telephone. Setting & participants: Adult (18+) patients with CKD stage 3-4 were recruited via their General Practitioner (GP). Practitioners were recruited from both general and specialist services. Results: Sixteen patients and twenty-two practitioners participated in the study between July and September, 2011. Both patients and practitioners preferred 'GP with access to a specialist' and least preferred 'Specialist Review'. Computer review and telephone review were acceptable to participants under certain conditions. Practitioners favoured generalist management of patients with CKD 3. Specialists recommended active discharge of patients with stabilised stage 4 back to generalist care. Both generalists and specialists strongly supported sharing patients' medical records via electronic consultation systems. Conclusion: Participants tended to prefer the current model of CKD management. Suggested improvements included; increasing the involvement of patients in referral and discharge decisions; improving the adequacy of information given to specialists on referral and encouraging further use of clinical guidelines in practice.

AB - Background: Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is increasing in prevalence and significance as a global public health issue. Appropriate management of CKD stages 3-4 in either generalist or specialist care is essential in order to slow disease progression. As various consulting options between services may be used, it is important to understand how patients and practitioners view these options. Objective: To elicit patient and practitioner views and preferences on the acceptability and appropriateness of referral practices and consulting options for CKD stage 3-4. Design: A mixed methods approach involving a semi-structured interview and structured rating exercise administered by telephone. Setting & participants: Adult (18+) patients with CKD stage 3-4 were recruited via their General Practitioner (GP). Practitioners were recruited from both general and specialist services. Results: Sixteen patients and twenty-two practitioners participated in the study between July and September, 2011. Both patients and practitioners preferred 'GP with access to a specialist' and least preferred 'Specialist Review'. Computer review and telephone review were acceptable to participants under certain conditions. Practitioners favoured generalist management of patients with CKD 3. Specialists recommended active discharge of patients with stabilised stage 4 back to generalist care. Both generalists and specialists strongly supported sharing patients' medical records via electronic consultation systems. Conclusion: Participants tended to prefer the current model of CKD management. Suggested improvements included; increasing the involvement of patients in referral and discharge decisions; improving the adequacy of information given to specialists on referral and encouraging further use of clinical guidelines in practice.

KW - Acceptability

KW - Appropriateness

KW - Chronic kidney disease

KW - Generalist

KW - Preference

KW - Specialist

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928753400&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/hex.12025

DO - 10.1111/hex.12025

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 325

EP - 334

JO - Health Expectations

JF - Health Expectations

SN - 1369-6513

IS - 3

ER -