Reflecting on men and social policy

Contemporary critical debates and implications for social policy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To put 'men' and 'social policy' together may still seem a little strange. Yet there are numerous ways in which social policy is about men, in its formulation, implementation, delivery, and inclusions/exclusions. Different men have variable relations to social policy, and are involved and implicated in social policy in a wide variety of ways, as: users, family members, practitioners, managers, policy makers, members of social organizations, and so on. Likewise, the explicit gendering and naming of men is uneven in different social policy arenas. This article discusses contemporary debates in Critical Studies on Men - masculinity and multiple masculinities; hegemonic masculinity and the hegemony of men; embodiment; and transnationalization and virtualization - and in each case considers their implications for social policy, before some concluding remarks.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)165-188
Number of pages24
JournalCritical Social Policy
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2010

Fingerprint

masculinity
transnationalization
virtualization
hegemony
family member
Social Policy
exclusion
inclusion
manager

Cite this

@article{7ac135f399f24efaae30ebc10cd626f3,
title = "Reflecting on men and social policy: Contemporary critical debates and implications for social policy",
abstract = "To put 'men' and 'social policy' together may still seem a little strange. Yet there are numerous ways in which social policy is about men, in its formulation, implementation, delivery, and inclusions/exclusions. Different men have variable relations to social policy, and are involved and implicated in social policy in a wide variety of ways, as: users, family members, practitioners, managers, policy makers, members of social organizations, and so on. Likewise, the explicit gendering and naming of men is uneven in different social policy arenas. This article discusses contemporary debates in Critical Studies on Men - masculinity and multiple masculinities; hegemonic masculinity and the hegemony of men; embodiment; and transnationalization and virtualization - and in each case considers their implications for social policy, before some concluding remarks.",
keywords = "Age, Embodiment, Hegemony, Transnationalization, Violence",
author = "Jeff Hearn",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1177/0261018309358288",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "165--188",
journal = "Critical Social Policy",
issn = "0261-0183",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Reflecting on men and social policy : Contemporary critical debates and implications for social policy. / Hearn, Jeff.

In: Critical Social Policy, Vol. 30, No. 2, 05.2010, p. 165-188.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reflecting on men and social policy

T2 - Contemporary critical debates and implications for social policy

AU - Hearn, Jeff

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - To put 'men' and 'social policy' together may still seem a little strange. Yet there are numerous ways in which social policy is about men, in its formulation, implementation, delivery, and inclusions/exclusions. Different men have variable relations to social policy, and are involved and implicated in social policy in a wide variety of ways, as: users, family members, practitioners, managers, policy makers, members of social organizations, and so on. Likewise, the explicit gendering and naming of men is uneven in different social policy arenas. This article discusses contemporary debates in Critical Studies on Men - masculinity and multiple masculinities; hegemonic masculinity and the hegemony of men; embodiment; and transnationalization and virtualization - and in each case considers their implications for social policy, before some concluding remarks.

AB - To put 'men' and 'social policy' together may still seem a little strange. Yet there are numerous ways in which social policy is about men, in its formulation, implementation, delivery, and inclusions/exclusions. Different men have variable relations to social policy, and are involved and implicated in social policy in a wide variety of ways, as: users, family members, practitioners, managers, policy makers, members of social organizations, and so on. Likewise, the explicit gendering and naming of men is uneven in different social policy arenas. This article discusses contemporary debates in Critical Studies on Men - masculinity and multiple masculinities; hegemonic masculinity and the hegemony of men; embodiment; and transnationalization and virtualization - and in each case considers their implications for social policy, before some concluding remarks.

KW - Age

KW - Embodiment

KW - Hegemony

KW - Transnationalization

KW - Violence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952211612&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0261018309358288

DO - 10.1177/0261018309358288

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 165

EP - 188

JO - Critical Social Policy

JF - Critical Social Policy

SN - 0261-0183

IS - 2

ER -