Reflexivity and Praxis

The Redress of 'I' Poems in Revealing Standpoint

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter explores researcher reflexivity developed during an institutional ethnography (IE) (Smith 2005) of a primary school. It illustrates use of a narrative method, ‘The Listening Guide’ (Mauthner and Doucet 2008), in particular my production of an ‘I’ poem after being interviewed by research participants. This promotes an ethical approach to researcher reflexivity, enabling an explicit analysis of the researcher’s subjectivities in the use of ethnographic methods and a deeper understanding of privilege and power on the part of the researcher. The approach works to negate any researcher authority over the textual representations of the research participants and objectification of them.

Consideration is given to the tensions between the sociological basis of IE and how this is troubled by particular approaches to narrative production. The point of reflection in institutional ethnography is not to learn about the researcher per se, but to learn about the researcher’s location in the ‘relations of ruling’ (Smith 2005), that is, the researcher’s standpoint. There are particular tensions for institutional ethnographers in seeking to avoid objectification of participants through both ‘institutional capture’ and ‘privileged irresponsibility’, specifically; the imposition of researcher subjectivities in listening for, asking about and producing texts. A significant concern, for example, in this research context is the researcher’s place and privilege in the education hierarchy. I argue that it is precisely because of the troubling nature of the Listening Guide and ‘I’ poems that they can be utilised by institutional ethnographers in revealing and analysing the co-ordination of social relations.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPerspectives On and From Institutional Ethnography
EditorsJames Reid, Lisa Russell
PublisherEmerald Group Publishing Ltd.
ISBN (Print)9781787146532
Publication statusPublished - 15 Nov 2017

Publication series

NameStudies in Qualitative Methodology
PublisherEmerald
Volume15
ISSN (Print)1042-3192

Fingerprint

reflexivity
ethnography
objectification
privilege
subjectivity
narrative
Social Relations
primary school

Cite this

Reid, J. (2017). Reflexivity and Praxis: The Redress of 'I' Poems in Revealing Standpoint. In J. Reid, & L. Russell (Eds.), Perspectives On and From Institutional Ethnography (Studies in Qualitative Methodology; Vol. 15). Emerald Group Publishing Ltd..
Reid, James. / Reflexivity and Praxis : The Redress of 'I' Poems in Revealing Standpoint. Perspectives On and From Institutional Ethnography. editor / James Reid ; Lisa Russell. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., 2017. (Studies in Qualitative Methodology).
@inbook{4a4906930a0a495897283533b6869196,
title = "Reflexivity and Praxis: The Redress of 'I' Poems in Revealing Standpoint",
abstract = "This chapter explores researcher reflexivity developed during an institutional ethnography (IE) (Smith 2005) of a primary school. It illustrates use of a narrative method, ‘The Listening Guide’ (Mauthner and Doucet 2008), in particular my production of an ‘I’ poem after being interviewed by research participants. This promotes an ethical approach to researcher reflexivity, enabling an explicit analysis of the researcher’s subjectivities in the use of ethnographic methods and a deeper understanding of privilege and power on the part of the researcher. The approach works to negate any researcher authority over the textual representations of the research participants and objectification of them.Consideration is given to the tensions between the sociological basis of IE and how this is troubled by particular approaches to narrative production. The point of reflection in institutional ethnography is not to learn about the researcher per se, but to learn about the researcher’s location in the ‘relations of ruling’ (Smith 2005), that is, the researcher’s standpoint. There are particular tensions for institutional ethnographers in seeking to avoid objectification of participants through both ‘institutional capture’ and ‘privileged irresponsibility’, specifically; the imposition of researcher subjectivities in listening for, asking about and producing texts. A significant concern, for example, in this research context is the researcher’s place and privilege in the education hierarchy. I argue that it is precisely because of the troubling nature of the Listening Guide and ‘I’ poems that they can be utilised by institutional ethnographers in revealing and analysing the co-ordination of social relations.",
keywords = "'I' poems, Institutional capture, (Ir)responsibility, Reflexivity, Standpoint",
author = "James Reid",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "15",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781787146532",
series = "Studies in Qualitative Methodology",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
editor = "James Reid and Lisa Russell",
booktitle = "Perspectives On and From Institutional Ethnography",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Reid, J 2017, Reflexivity and Praxis: The Redress of 'I' Poems in Revealing Standpoint. in J Reid & L Russell (eds), Perspectives On and From Institutional Ethnography. Studies in Qualitative Methodology, vol. 15, Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.

Reflexivity and Praxis : The Redress of 'I' Poems in Revealing Standpoint. / Reid, James.

Perspectives On and From Institutional Ethnography. ed. / James Reid; Lisa Russell. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., 2017. (Studies in Qualitative Methodology; Vol. 15).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Reflexivity and Praxis

T2 - The Redress of 'I' Poems in Revealing Standpoint

AU - Reid, James

PY - 2017/11/15

Y1 - 2017/11/15

N2 - This chapter explores researcher reflexivity developed during an institutional ethnography (IE) (Smith 2005) of a primary school. It illustrates use of a narrative method, ‘The Listening Guide’ (Mauthner and Doucet 2008), in particular my production of an ‘I’ poem after being interviewed by research participants. This promotes an ethical approach to researcher reflexivity, enabling an explicit analysis of the researcher’s subjectivities in the use of ethnographic methods and a deeper understanding of privilege and power on the part of the researcher. The approach works to negate any researcher authority over the textual representations of the research participants and objectification of them.Consideration is given to the tensions between the sociological basis of IE and how this is troubled by particular approaches to narrative production. The point of reflection in institutional ethnography is not to learn about the researcher per se, but to learn about the researcher’s location in the ‘relations of ruling’ (Smith 2005), that is, the researcher’s standpoint. There are particular tensions for institutional ethnographers in seeking to avoid objectification of participants through both ‘institutional capture’ and ‘privileged irresponsibility’, specifically; the imposition of researcher subjectivities in listening for, asking about and producing texts. A significant concern, for example, in this research context is the researcher’s place and privilege in the education hierarchy. I argue that it is precisely because of the troubling nature of the Listening Guide and ‘I’ poems that they can be utilised by institutional ethnographers in revealing and analysing the co-ordination of social relations.

AB - This chapter explores researcher reflexivity developed during an institutional ethnography (IE) (Smith 2005) of a primary school. It illustrates use of a narrative method, ‘The Listening Guide’ (Mauthner and Doucet 2008), in particular my production of an ‘I’ poem after being interviewed by research participants. This promotes an ethical approach to researcher reflexivity, enabling an explicit analysis of the researcher’s subjectivities in the use of ethnographic methods and a deeper understanding of privilege and power on the part of the researcher. The approach works to negate any researcher authority over the textual representations of the research participants and objectification of them.Consideration is given to the tensions between the sociological basis of IE and how this is troubled by particular approaches to narrative production. The point of reflection in institutional ethnography is not to learn about the researcher per se, but to learn about the researcher’s location in the ‘relations of ruling’ (Smith 2005), that is, the researcher’s standpoint. There are particular tensions for institutional ethnographers in seeking to avoid objectification of participants through both ‘institutional capture’ and ‘privileged irresponsibility’, specifically; the imposition of researcher subjectivities in listening for, asking about and producing texts. A significant concern, for example, in this research context is the researcher’s place and privilege in the education hierarchy. I argue that it is precisely because of the troubling nature of the Listening Guide and ‘I’ poems that they can be utilised by institutional ethnographers in revealing and analysing the co-ordination of social relations.

KW - 'I' poems

KW - Institutional capture

KW - (Ir)responsibility

KW - Reflexivity

KW - Standpoint

UR - http://books.emeraldinsight.com/page/detail/Perspectives-on-and-from-Institutional-Ethnography/?k=9781787146532

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781787146532

T3 - Studies in Qualitative Methodology

BT - Perspectives On and From Institutional Ethnography

A2 - Reid, James

A2 - Russell, Lisa

PB - Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.

ER -

Reid J. Reflexivity and Praxis: The Redress of 'I' Poems in Revealing Standpoint. In Reid J, Russell L, editors, Perspectives On and From Institutional Ethnography. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. 2017. (Studies in Qualitative Methodology).