Regulating active voluntary euthanasia: What can England & Wales learn from Belgium and the Netherlands?

Samantha Halliday, Austin Garwood-Gowers (Editor)

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter considers the regulation of active voluntary euthanasia in Belgium and the Netherlands, analysing the Dutch and Belgian Acts and the context in which they operate. It is argued that the current law pertaining to end-of-life decision-making in England and Wales is ethically and intellectually inconsistent and in need of reform. Whilst it is not suggested that either the Dutch or the Belgian Act could be imported wholesale into English law, not least because both countries have different legal systems and legal cultures from that of England and Wales, it is argued that valuable lessons can be learnt from the Dutch and Belgian experiences. The chapter concludes with a discussion of how stringent safeguards could be incorporated into legislation legalising active voluntary euthanasia.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationContemporary Issues in Health Law and Ethics
EditorsAusten Garwood-Gowers, John Tingle, Kay Wheat
PublisherElsevier
Chapter14
Pages269 – 302
Number of pages34
ISBN (Print)0750688327, 9780750688321
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

euthanasia
Belgian
Belgium
Netherlands
act
Law
legal system
legislation
decision making
regulation
reform
experience

Cite this

Halliday, S., & Garwood-Gowers, A. (Ed.) (2005). Regulating active voluntary euthanasia: What can England & Wales learn from Belgium and the Netherlands? In A. Garwood-Gowers, J. Tingle, & K. Wheat (Eds.), Contemporary Issues in Health Law and Ethics (pp. 269 – 302). Elsevier.
Halliday, Samantha ; Garwood-Gowers, Austin (Editor). / Regulating active voluntary euthanasia : What can England & Wales learn from Belgium and the Netherlands?. Contemporary Issues in Health Law and Ethics. editor / Austen Garwood-Gowers ; John Tingle ; Kay Wheat. Elsevier, 2005. pp. 269 – 302
@inbook{d0c1934b04974bfbb4e1a3c059b396ea,
title = "Regulating active voluntary euthanasia: What can England & Wales learn from Belgium and the Netherlands?",
abstract = "This chapter considers the regulation of active voluntary euthanasia in Belgium and the Netherlands, analysing the Dutch and Belgian Acts and the context in which they operate. It is argued that the current law pertaining to end-of-life decision-making in England and Wales is ethically and intellectually inconsistent and in need of reform. Whilst it is not suggested that either the Dutch or the Belgian Act could be imported wholesale into English law, not least because both countries have different legal systems and legal cultures from that of England and Wales, it is argued that valuable lessons can be learnt from the Dutch and Belgian experiences. The chapter concludes with a discussion of how stringent safeguards could be incorporated into legislation legalising active voluntary euthanasia.",
author = "Samantha Halliday and Austin Garwood-Gowers",
year = "2005",
language = "English",
isbn = "0750688327",
pages = "269 – 302",
editor = "Austen Garwood-Gowers and John Tingle and Kay Wheat",
booktitle = "Contemporary Issues in Health Law and Ethics",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Halliday, S & Garwood-Gowers, A (ed.) 2005, Regulating active voluntary euthanasia: What can England & Wales learn from Belgium and the Netherlands? in A Garwood-Gowers, J Tingle & K Wheat (eds), Contemporary Issues in Health Law and Ethics. Elsevier, pp. 269 – 302.

Regulating active voluntary euthanasia : What can England & Wales learn from Belgium and the Netherlands? / Halliday, Samantha; Garwood-Gowers, Austin (Editor).

Contemporary Issues in Health Law and Ethics. ed. / Austen Garwood-Gowers; John Tingle; Kay Wheat. Elsevier, 2005. p. 269 – 302.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Regulating active voluntary euthanasia

T2 - What can England & Wales learn from Belgium and the Netherlands?

AU - Halliday, Samantha

A2 - Garwood-Gowers, Austin

A2 - Garwood-Gowers, Austen

A2 - Tingle, John

A2 - Wheat, Kay

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - This chapter considers the regulation of active voluntary euthanasia in Belgium and the Netherlands, analysing the Dutch and Belgian Acts and the context in which they operate. It is argued that the current law pertaining to end-of-life decision-making in England and Wales is ethically and intellectually inconsistent and in need of reform. Whilst it is not suggested that either the Dutch or the Belgian Act could be imported wholesale into English law, not least because both countries have different legal systems and legal cultures from that of England and Wales, it is argued that valuable lessons can be learnt from the Dutch and Belgian experiences. The chapter concludes with a discussion of how stringent safeguards could be incorporated into legislation legalising active voluntary euthanasia.

AB - This chapter considers the regulation of active voluntary euthanasia in Belgium and the Netherlands, analysing the Dutch and Belgian Acts and the context in which they operate. It is argued that the current law pertaining to end-of-life decision-making in England and Wales is ethically and intellectually inconsistent and in need of reform. Whilst it is not suggested that either the Dutch or the Belgian Act could be imported wholesale into English law, not least because both countries have different legal systems and legal cultures from that of England and Wales, it is argued that valuable lessons can be learnt from the Dutch and Belgian experiences. The chapter concludes with a discussion of how stringent safeguards could be incorporated into legislation legalising active voluntary euthanasia.

M3 - Chapter

SN - 0750688327

SN - 9780750688321

SP - 269

EP - 302

BT - Contemporary Issues in Health Law and Ethics

PB - Elsevier

ER -

Halliday S, Garwood-Gowers A, (ed.). Regulating active voluntary euthanasia: What can England & Wales learn from Belgium and the Netherlands? In Garwood-Gowers A, Tingle J, Wheat K, editors, Contemporary Issues in Health Law and Ethics. Elsevier. 2005. p. 269 – 302