Regulating advance decision-making: potential and challenges for Malaysia

Hui Yun Chan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)


The right to refuse treatment is generally accepted in the legal and bioethics discourses; however, the use of advance directives remains contentious. Some jurisdictions have introduced statutory frameworks to govern the creation and implementation of advance directives, underpinned primarily by the recognition of respect for personal autonomy. Although there are no legislation and judicial decisions on advance decision-making in Malaysia, the considered view is that healthcare practitioners perceived its utility in managing patient care. This paper examines the potential and challenges of applying a statutory framework in Malaysia, drawing from relevant regulatory examples. It argues for greater public awareness within the healthcare discourse and knowledge dissemination regarding the availability, usage and clinical guidance on advance decision-making. The main conclusion drawn from this exploratory analysis is that further understanding of and education about advance decision-making within the population and healthcare practitioners should precede the implementation of a statutory regime in Malaysia.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)111-122
Number of pages12
JournalAsian Bioethics Review
Issue number1
Early online date22 Mar 2019
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2019


Dive into the research topics of 'Regulating advance decision-making: potential and challenges for Malaysia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this