Regulating advance decision-making

potential and challenges for Malaysia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The right to refuse treatment is generally accepted in the legal and bioethics discourses; however, the use of advance directives remains contentious. Some jurisdictions have introduced statutory frameworks to govern the creation and implementation of advance directives, underpinned primarily by the recognition of respect for personal autonomy. Although there are no legislation and judicial decisions on advance decision-making in Malaysia, the considered view is that healthcare practitioners perceived its utility in managing patient care. This paper examines the potential and challenges of applying a statutory framework in Malaysia, drawing from relevant regulatory examples. It argues for greater public awareness within the healthcare discourse and knowledge dissemination regarding the availability, usage and clinical guidance on advance decision-making. The main conclusion drawn from this exploratory analysis is that further understanding of and education about advance decision-making within the population and healthcare practitioners should precede the implementation of a statutory regime in Malaysia.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)111-122
Number of pages12
JournalAsian Bioethics Review
Volume11
Issue number1
Early online date22 Mar 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Malaysia
Advance Directives
Decision Making
Delivery of Health Care
decision making
Personal Autonomy
Bioethics
discourse
Patient Rights
bioethics
Legislation
patient care
jurisdiction
respect
Patient Care
autonomy
legislation
regime
Education
Population

Cite this

@article{e14c8c8bf27246b6a1b06028a2e33d41,
title = "Regulating advance decision-making: potential and challenges for Malaysia",
abstract = "The right to refuse treatment is generally accepted in the legal and bioethics discourses; however, the use of advance directives remains contentious. Some jurisdictions have introduced statutory frameworks to govern the creation and implementation of advance directives, underpinned primarily by the recognition of respect for personal autonomy. Although there are no legislation and judicial decisions on advance decision-making in Malaysia, the considered view is that healthcare practitioners perceived its utility in managing patient care. This paper examines the potential and challenges of applying a statutory framework in Malaysia, drawing from relevant regulatory examples. It argues for greater public awareness within the healthcare discourse and knowledge dissemination regarding the availability, usage and clinical guidance on advance decision-making. The main conclusion drawn from this exploratory analysis is that further understanding of and education about advance decision-making within the population and healthcare practitioners should precede the implementation of a statutory regime in Malaysia.",
keywords = "Advance directives, Patient care, Autonomy, Malaysia, Decision-making",
author = "Chan, {Hui Yun}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s41649-019-00078-2",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "111--122",
journal = "Asian Bioethics Review",
issn = "1793-9453",
publisher = "National University of Singapore, Department of Biological Sciences, Centre for Biomedical Ethics",
number = "1",

}

Regulating advance decision-making : potential and challenges for Malaysia. / Chan, Hui Yun.

In: Asian Bioethics Review, Vol. 11, No. 1, 03.2019, p. 111-122.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regulating advance decision-making

T2 - potential and challenges for Malaysia

AU - Chan, Hui Yun

PY - 2019/3

Y1 - 2019/3

N2 - The right to refuse treatment is generally accepted in the legal and bioethics discourses; however, the use of advance directives remains contentious. Some jurisdictions have introduced statutory frameworks to govern the creation and implementation of advance directives, underpinned primarily by the recognition of respect for personal autonomy. Although there are no legislation and judicial decisions on advance decision-making in Malaysia, the considered view is that healthcare practitioners perceived its utility in managing patient care. This paper examines the potential and challenges of applying a statutory framework in Malaysia, drawing from relevant regulatory examples. It argues for greater public awareness within the healthcare discourse and knowledge dissemination regarding the availability, usage and clinical guidance on advance decision-making. The main conclusion drawn from this exploratory analysis is that further understanding of and education about advance decision-making within the population and healthcare practitioners should precede the implementation of a statutory regime in Malaysia.

AB - The right to refuse treatment is generally accepted in the legal and bioethics discourses; however, the use of advance directives remains contentious. Some jurisdictions have introduced statutory frameworks to govern the creation and implementation of advance directives, underpinned primarily by the recognition of respect for personal autonomy. Although there are no legislation and judicial decisions on advance decision-making in Malaysia, the considered view is that healthcare practitioners perceived its utility in managing patient care. This paper examines the potential and challenges of applying a statutory framework in Malaysia, drawing from relevant regulatory examples. It argues for greater public awareness within the healthcare discourse and knowledge dissemination regarding the availability, usage and clinical guidance on advance decision-making. The main conclusion drawn from this exploratory analysis is that further understanding of and education about advance decision-making within the population and healthcare practitioners should precede the implementation of a statutory regime in Malaysia.

KW - Advance directives

KW - Patient care

KW - Autonomy

KW - Malaysia

KW - Decision-making

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069497321&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s41649-019-00078-2

DO - 10.1007/s41649-019-00078-2

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 111

EP - 122

JO - Asian Bioethics Review

JF - Asian Bioethics Review

SN - 1793-9453

IS - 1

ER -