Relations, commitment and satisfaction in agency workers and permanent workers

David Biggs, Stephen Swailes

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose - To investigate the level of organizational commitment in agency workers compared with permanent workers by taking into account relations between the two groups. Design/methodology/approach - A mixed methods design was employed comprising of a quantitative survey of 157 call centre workers followed by 29 qualitative interviews with permanent workers, agency workers and employers. Findings - Agency workers had a significantly lower level of organizational commitment compared with permanent workers once the relation between agency and permanent workers was controlled. Significant correlations were found within the sample between organizational commitment, being valued and job satisfaction further supported by a hierarchical multiple linear regression. Research limitations/implications - As with all cross-sectional research causality cannot be confirmed and difficulty accessing call centre workers led to a restricted sample size. The measurement of worker relations needs developing. Further research is proposed to address these limitations and extend the findings. Practical implications - The implication for human resource management is that employers must be aware of the possible adverse influence that agency workers may have on permanent workers and as such try to incorporate agency workers within the organization to support their commitment. Originality/value - Previous studies have found inconsistent variations in the relative organizational commitment of permanent and temporary employees; a counter-intuitive finding given the precarious employment contract held by temporary workers. This study casts light on these results by controlling for the relation between agency workers and permanent workers.

LanguageEnglish
Pages130-143
Number of pages14
JournalEmployee Relations
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Workers
Organizational commitment
Call centres
Employers
Design methodology
Job satisfaction
Employment contracts
Multiple linear regression
Temporary workers
Mixed methods
Causality
Sample size
Employees
Precarious employment
Human resource management

Cite this

@article{89b5b8f71e8349149c179fc7b48adeae,
title = "Relations, commitment and satisfaction in agency workers and permanent workers",
abstract = "Purpose - To investigate the level of organizational commitment in agency workers compared with permanent workers by taking into account relations between the two groups. Design/methodology/approach - A mixed methods design was employed comprising of a quantitative survey of 157 call centre workers followed by 29 qualitative interviews with permanent workers, agency workers and employers. Findings - Agency workers had a significantly lower level of organizational commitment compared with permanent workers once the relation between agency and permanent workers was controlled. Significant correlations were found within the sample between organizational commitment, being valued and job satisfaction further supported by a hierarchical multiple linear regression. Research limitations/implications - As with all cross-sectional research causality cannot be confirmed and difficulty accessing call centre workers led to a restricted sample size. The measurement of worker relations needs developing. Further research is proposed to address these limitations and extend the findings. Practical implications - The implication for human resource management is that employers must be aware of the possible adverse influence that agency workers may have on permanent workers and as such try to incorporate agency workers within the organization to support their commitment. Originality/value - Previous studies have found inconsistent variations in the relative organizational commitment of permanent and temporary employees; a counter-intuitive finding given the precarious employment contract held by temporary workers. This study casts light on these results by controlling for the relation between agency workers and permanent workers.",
keywords = "Contingent workers, Contract workers, Employee relations, Job satisfaction, Permanent workers, Temporary workers",
author = "David Biggs and Stephen Swailes",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1108/01425450610639365",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "130--143",
journal = "Employee Relations",
issn = "0142-5455",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Relations, commitment and satisfaction in agency workers and permanent workers. / Biggs, David; Swailes, Stephen.

In: Employee Relations, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2006, p. 130-143.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relations, commitment and satisfaction in agency workers and permanent workers

AU - Biggs, David

AU - Swailes, Stephen

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Purpose - To investigate the level of organizational commitment in agency workers compared with permanent workers by taking into account relations between the two groups. Design/methodology/approach - A mixed methods design was employed comprising of a quantitative survey of 157 call centre workers followed by 29 qualitative interviews with permanent workers, agency workers and employers. Findings - Agency workers had a significantly lower level of organizational commitment compared with permanent workers once the relation between agency and permanent workers was controlled. Significant correlations were found within the sample between organizational commitment, being valued and job satisfaction further supported by a hierarchical multiple linear regression. Research limitations/implications - As with all cross-sectional research causality cannot be confirmed and difficulty accessing call centre workers led to a restricted sample size. The measurement of worker relations needs developing. Further research is proposed to address these limitations and extend the findings. Practical implications - The implication for human resource management is that employers must be aware of the possible adverse influence that agency workers may have on permanent workers and as such try to incorporate agency workers within the organization to support their commitment. Originality/value - Previous studies have found inconsistent variations in the relative organizational commitment of permanent and temporary employees; a counter-intuitive finding given the precarious employment contract held by temporary workers. This study casts light on these results by controlling for the relation between agency workers and permanent workers.

AB - Purpose - To investigate the level of organizational commitment in agency workers compared with permanent workers by taking into account relations between the two groups. Design/methodology/approach - A mixed methods design was employed comprising of a quantitative survey of 157 call centre workers followed by 29 qualitative interviews with permanent workers, agency workers and employers. Findings - Agency workers had a significantly lower level of organizational commitment compared with permanent workers once the relation between agency and permanent workers was controlled. Significant correlations were found within the sample between organizational commitment, being valued and job satisfaction further supported by a hierarchical multiple linear regression. Research limitations/implications - As with all cross-sectional research causality cannot be confirmed and difficulty accessing call centre workers led to a restricted sample size. The measurement of worker relations needs developing. Further research is proposed to address these limitations and extend the findings. Practical implications - The implication for human resource management is that employers must be aware of the possible adverse influence that agency workers may have on permanent workers and as such try to incorporate agency workers within the organization to support their commitment. Originality/value - Previous studies have found inconsistent variations in the relative organizational commitment of permanent and temporary employees; a counter-intuitive finding given the precarious employment contract held by temporary workers. This study casts light on these results by controlling for the relation between agency workers and permanent workers.

KW - Contingent workers

KW - Contract workers

KW - Employee relations

KW - Job satisfaction

KW - Permanent workers

KW - Temporary workers

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=30344476951&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/01425450610639365

DO - 10.1108/01425450610639365

M3 - Review article

VL - 28

SP - 130

EP - 143

JO - Employee Relations

T2 - Employee Relations

JF - Employee Relations

SN - 0142-5455

IS - 2

ER -