Renegotiating the terms of engagement: Public relations, marketing, and contemporary challenges

David McKie, Paul Willis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Territorial disputes between public relations and marketing are nothing new. At the end of the first decade of the 21st century, Hutton (2010) refocused them as a matter of survival in the face of marketing attempts “to include or subsume much or all of public relations” (p. 509). In addition to aligning with his call to resist marketing imperialism, this article seeks to renegotiate traditional turf wars between the two fields through a review of recent significant marketing books. Advocating a complexity-based perspective, it argues that evolving disciplines, like evolving species, need to respond not only to each other but also to the wider environment and that requires cooperation as well as competition. It also draws on complexity thinking as a resource for improving disciplinary intersections and for adapting to the uncertain and turbulent conditions of the present.
LanguageEnglish
Pages846-852
Number of pages7
JournalPublic Relations Review
Volume38
Issue number5
Early online date22 May 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Public relations
Marketing
marketing
imperialism
present
resources

Cite this

@article{178b9596ce6743c981ea07dbfc983ed1,
title = "Renegotiating the terms of engagement: Public relations, marketing, and contemporary challenges",
abstract = "Territorial disputes between public relations and marketing are nothing new. At the end of the first decade of the 21st century, Hutton (2010) refocused them as a matter of survival in the face of marketing attempts “to include or subsume much or all of public relations” (p. 509). In addition to aligning with his call to resist marketing imperialism, this article seeks to renegotiate traditional turf wars between the two fields through a review of recent significant marketing books. Advocating a complexity-based perspective, it argues that evolving disciplines, like evolving species, need to respond not only to each other but also to the wider environment and that requires cooperation as well as competition. It also draws on complexity thinking as a resource for improving disciplinary intersections and for adapting to the uncertain and turbulent conditions of the present.",
keywords = "Public Relations, Marketing, Complexity, Disciplinary intersections",
author = "David McKie and Paul Willis",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.03.008",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "846--852",
journal = "Public Relations Review",
issn = "0363-8111",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "5",

}

Renegotiating the terms of engagement : Public relations, marketing, and contemporary challenges. / McKie, David; Willis, Paul.

In: Public Relations Review, Vol. 38, No. 5, 12.2012, p. 846-852.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Renegotiating the terms of engagement

T2 - Public Relations Review

AU - McKie, David

AU - Willis, Paul

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - Territorial disputes between public relations and marketing are nothing new. At the end of the first decade of the 21st century, Hutton (2010) refocused them as a matter of survival in the face of marketing attempts “to include or subsume much or all of public relations” (p. 509). In addition to aligning with his call to resist marketing imperialism, this article seeks to renegotiate traditional turf wars between the two fields through a review of recent significant marketing books. Advocating a complexity-based perspective, it argues that evolving disciplines, like evolving species, need to respond not only to each other but also to the wider environment and that requires cooperation as well as competition. It also draws on complexity thinking as a resource for improving disciplinary intersections and for adapting to the uncertain and turbulent conditions of the present.

AB - Territorial disputes between public relations and marketing are nothing new. At the end of the first decade of the 21st century, Hutton (2010) refocused them as a matter of survival in the face of marketing attempts “to include or subsume much or all of public relations” (p. 509). In addition to aligning with his call to resist marketing imperialism, this article seeks to renegotiate traditional turf wars between the two fields through a review of recent significant marketing books. Advocating a complexity-based perspective, it argues that evolving disciplines, like evolving species, need to respond not only to each other but also to the wider environment and that requires cooperation as well as competition. It also draws on complexity thinking as a resource for improving disciplinary intersections and for adapting to the uncertain and turbulent conditions of the present.

KW - Public Relations

KW - Marketing

KW - Complexity

KW - Disciplinary intersections

U2 - 10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.03.008

DO - 10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.03.008

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 846

EP - 852

JO - Public Relations Review

JF - Public Relations Review

SN - 0363-8111

IS - 5

ER -