Rethinking discernment

Dániel Z. Kádár, Sara Mills

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article engages with the notions of discernment and volition, developed by Ide (1989), in order to consider how the concept which these phenomena describe could be reintroduced into second-wave critical analysis of politeness and impoliteness. It is our contention that these terms have been used in a way which polarizes cultures, so that various East Asian cultures are characterized as 'discernment cultures' whilst Western cultures are seen as 'volitional'. We argue that this polarization is problematic as it does not capture politeness behaviour beyond certain stereotypes, and as such it fails to address the complexities with which a cross-cultural examination of politeness needs to cope. Nevertheless, we believe that the cross-cultural phenomenon which Ide attempted to capture should not be completely ignored. Thus, we reconceptualize the notions of discernment and volition, by focusing on discernment, and we integrate this concept into a framework (Kádár 2013) based on convention and ritual, hence providing a way of using the term discernment in crosscultural (and intercultural) analysis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)133-158
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Politeness Research
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2013

Fingerprint

politeness
Polarization
Ceremonial Behavior
polarization
stereotype
religious behavior
examination
Discernment
Politeness
Volition

Cite this

Kádár, Dániel Z. ; Mills, Sara. / Rethinking discernment. In: Journal of Politeness Research. 2013 ; Vol. 9, No. 2. pp. 133-158.
@article{d1c4b12fc34241d7bea5e91d6815851d,
title = "Rethinking discernment",
abstract = "This article engages with the notions of discernment and volition, developed by Ide (1989), in order to consider how the concept which these phenomena describe could be reintroduced into second-wave critical analysis of politeness and impoliteness. It is our contention that these terms have been used in a way which polarizes cultures, so that various East Asian cultures are characterized as 'discernment cultures' whilst Western cultures are seen as 'volitional'. We argue that this polarization is problematic as it does not capture politeness behaviour beyond certain stereotypes, and as such it fails to address the complexities with which a cross-cultural examination of politeness needs to cope. Nevertheless, we believe that the cross-cultural phenomenon which Ide attempted to capture should not be completely ignored. Thus, we reconceptualize the notions of discernment and volition, by focusing on discernment, and we integrate this concept into a framework (K{\'a}d{\'a}r 2013) based on convention and ritual, hence providing a way of using the term discernment in crosscultural (and intercultural) analysis.",
keywords = "cross-cultural, discernment, intercultural, politeness, ritual, volition",
author = "K{\'a}d{\'a}r, {D{\'a}niel Z.} and Sara Mills",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1515/pr-2013-0007",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "133--158",
journal = "Journal of Politeness Research",
issn = "1612-5681",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH",
number = "2",

}

Kádár, DZ & Mills, S 2013, 'Rethinking discernment', Journal of Politeness Research, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 133-158. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2013-0007

Rethinking discernment. / Kádár, Dániel Z.; Mills, Sara.

In: Journal of Politeness Research, Vol. 9, No. 2, 01.06.2013, p. 133-158.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rethinking discernment

AU - Kádár, Dániel Z.

AU - Mills, Sara

PY - 2013/6/1

Y1 - 2013/6/1

N2 - This article engages with the notions of discernment and volition, developed by Ide (1989), in order to consider how the concept which these phenomena describe could be reintroduced into second-wave critical analysis of politeness and impoliteness. It is our contention that these terms have been used in a way which polarizes cultures, so that various East Asian cultures are characterized as 'discernment cultures' whilst Western cultures are seen as 'volitional'. We argue that this polarization is problematic as it does not capture politeness behaviour beyond certain stereotypes, and as such it fails to address the complexities with which a cross-cultural examination of politeness needs to cope. Nevertheless, we believe that the cross-cultural phenomenon which Ide attempted to capture should not be completely ignored. Thus, we reconceptualize the notions of discernment and volition, by focusing on discernment, and we integrate this concept into a framework (Kádár 2013) based on convention and ritual, hence providing a way of using the term discernment in crosscultural (and intercultural) analysis.

AB - This article engages with the notions of discernment and volition, developed by Ide (1989), in order to consider how the concept which these phenomena describe could be reintroduced into second-wave critical analysis of politeness and impoliteness. It is our contention that these terms have been used in a way which polarizes cultures, so that various East Asian cultures are characterized as 'discernment cultures' whilst Western cultures are seen as 'volitional'. We argue that this polarization is problematic as it does not capture politeness behaviour beyond certain stereotypes, and as such it fails to address the complexities with which a cross-cultural examination of politeness needs to cope. Nevertheless, we believe that the cross-cultural phenomenon which Ide attempted to capture should not be completely ignored. Thus, we reconceptualize the notions of discernment and volition, by focusing on discernment, and we integrate this concept into a framework (Kádár 2013) based on convention and ritual, hence providing a way of using the term discernment in crosscultural (and intercultural) analysis.

KW - cross-cultural

KW - discernment

KW - intercultural

KW - politeness

KW - ritual

KW - volition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922577680&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/pr-2013-0007

DO - 10.1515/pr-2013-0007

M3 - Review article

VL - 9

SP - 133

EP - 158

JO - Journal of Politeness Research

JF - Journal of Politeness Research

SN - 1612-5681

IS - 2

ER -