Revisiting the capital‐structure puzzle

UK evidence

Basil Al-Najjar, Khaled Hussainey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose
– This paper seeks to explore the potential drivers of corporate capital structure.

Design/methodology/approach
– The paper applies both fixed effects panel models and random effects tobit models to examine this issue. A sample of 379 firms is used across the period from 1991 to 2002.

Findings
– It is found that corporate characteristics (firm size, firm risk, firm growth rate, firm profitability and asset tangibility) and corporate governance characteristics (board size and outside directorships) are the main drivers of capital structure of UK firms. In addition, the results show that changing the definition of capital structure may result in changing the sign and the significance of these potential drivers.

Originality/value
– The paper argues that another dimension of the capital structure puzzle can be introduced which is related to the definition of capital structure used in prior studies. It is worth noting that the aim of this paper is not to provide an optimal set of factors that may affect the decision of capital structure, but to highlight the effect of the different definitions of capital structure that can be used by different studies, which makes the comparison between such studies difficult or even erroneous.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)329-338
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Risk Finance
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Capital structure
Random effects
Design methodology
Firm profitability
Firm risk
Firm growth
Firm size
Tobit model
Fixed effects
Assets
Corporate governance
Panel model
Factors
Board size

Cite this

Al-Najjar, Basil ; Hussainey , Khaled. / Revisiting the capital‐structure puzzle : UK evidence. In: Journal of Risk Finance. 2011 ; Vol. 12, No. 4. pp. 329-338.
@article{8964fa8465a04af0b4edf2839d73febf,
title = "Revisiting the capital‐structure puzzle: UK evidence",
abstract = "Purpose– This paper seeks to explore the potential drivers of corporate capital structure.Design/methodology/approach– The paper applies both fixed effects panel models and random effects tobit models to examine this issue. A sample of 379 firms is used across the period from 1991 to 2002.Findings– It is found that corporate characteristics (firm size, firm risk, firm growth rate, firm profitability and asset tangibility) and corporate governance characteristics (board size and outside directorships) are the main drivers of capital structure of UK firms. In addition, the results show that changing the definition of capital structure may result in changing the sign and the significance of these potential drivers.Originality/value– The paper argues that another dimension of the capital structure puzzle can be introduced which is related to the definition of capital structure used in prior studies. It is worth noting that the aim of this paper is not to provide an optimal set of factors that may affect the decision of capital structure, but to highlight the effect of the different definitions of capital structure that can be used by different studies, which makes the comparison between such studies difficult or even erroneous.",
keywords = "Capital structure, Corporate governance, United Kingdom",
author = "Basil Al-Najjar and Khaled Hussainey",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1108/15265941111158505",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "329--338",
journal = "Journal of Risk Finance",
issn = "0965-7967",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

Revisiting the capital‐structure puzzle : UK evidence. / Al-Najjar, Basil; Hussainey , Khaled.

In: Journal of Risk Finance, Vol. 12, No. 4, 2011, p. 329-338.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revisiting the capital‐structure puzzle

T2 - UK evidence

AU - Al-Najjar, Basil

AU - Hussainey , Khaled

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Purpose– This paper seeks to explore the potential drivers of corporate capital structure.Design/methodology/approach– The paper applies both fixed effects panel models and random effects tobit models to examine this issue. A sample of 379 firms is used across the period from 1991 to 2002.Findings– It is found that corporate characteristics (firm size, firm risk, firm growth rate, firm profitability and asset tangibility) and corporate governance characteristics (board size and outside directorships) are the main drivers of capital structure of UK firms. In addition, the results show that changing the definition of capital structure may result in changing the sign and the significance of these potential drivers.Originality/value– The paper argues that another dimension of the capital structure puzzle can be introduced which is related to the definition of capital structure used in prior studies. It is worth noting that the aim of this paper is not to provide an optimal set of factors that may affect the decision of capital structure, but to highlight the effect of the different definitions of capital structure that can be used by different studies, which makes the comparison between such studies difficult or even erroneous.

AB - Purpose– This paper seeks to explore the potential drivers of corporate capital structure.Design/methodology/approach– The paper applies both fixed effects panel models and random effects tobit models to examine this issue. A sample of 379 firms is used across the period from 1991 to 2002.Findings– It is found that corporate characteristics (firm size, firm risk, firm growth rate, firm profitability and asset tangibility) and corporate governance characteristics (board size and outside directorships) are the main drivers of capital structure of UK firms. In addition, the results show that changing the definition of capital structure may result in changing the sign and the significance of these potential drivers.Originality/value– The paper argues that another dimension of the capital structure puzzle can be introduced which is related to the definition of capital structure used in prior studies. It is worth noting that the aim of this paper is not to provide an optimal set of factors that may affect the decision of capital structure, but to highlight the effect of the different definitions of capital structure that can be used by different studies, which makes the comparison between such studies difficult or even erroneous.

KW - Capital structure

KW - Corporate governance

KW - United Kingdom

U2 - 10.1108/15265941111158505

DO - 10.1108/15265941111158505

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 329

EP - 338

JO - Journal of Risk Finance

JF - Journal of Risk Finance

SN - 0965-7967

IS - 4

ER -