Revisiting the Three Peculiarities of Production in Construction

Ruben Vrijhoef, Lauri Koskela

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Compared to many other industries, construction is a specific type of project industry with certain peculiarities influencing the characteristics of constructed products, ways of production, and the indus try itself. Previously three major peculiarities of production in construction have been discussed, i.e. site production (i.e. organising the production around the product dependent on outdoor conditions), temporary production organisation (e.g. fragmented supply chain), and one-of-a kind product (e.g. de sign-to-order project-based production). Many times, particularly within the realms of lean construc tion, the basic hypothesis has been that these peculiarities lead to variability and thus to waste, and low performance levels in terms of productivity and value delivery to clients. Inversely, lean construction should be aimed at the banning of waste, thus reduction of variability, and thus the reduction or even resolution of peculiarities. In this paper, the peculiarities of production in construction are discussed and whether they always cause problems, whether they are always leading to waste, and whether they always can and need to be reduced or resolved. Some examples of solutions resolving or reducing certain peculiarities are given, such as modular housing, pre-engineered buildings and off-site production. Based on the examples, the effects and costs of reduction and resolution of peculiarities are discussed. To conclude it is discussed whether construction must and can always be improved by resolving the peculiarities, and at what cost. It is concluded that peculiarities should be resolved when they are not needed. However, before to decide to do so, the additional costs or even the potential value loss that may be caused by peculiarities must always be related to the whole life costs and value of the object built, and the extra costs and efforts for resolving the peculiarities. Finally, issues for future research are given.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication13th International Group for Lean Construction Conference
PublisherInternational Group for Lean Construction ( IGLC )
Pages19-27
Number of pages9
ISBN (Print)1877040347, 9781877040344
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2005
Externally publishedYes
Event13th International Group for Lean Construction Conference - Sydney, Australia
Duration: 19 Jul 200521 Jul 2005
Conference number: 13

Conference

Conference13th International Group for Lean Construction Conference
Abbreviated titleIGLC 13
CountryAustralia
CitySydney
Period19/07/0521/07/05

Fingerprint

Costs
Construction industry
Supply chains
Productivity
Industry

Cite this

Vrijhoef, R., & Koskela, L. (2005). Revisiting the Three Peculiarities of Production in Construction. In 13th International Group for Lean Construction Conference (pp. 19-27). International Group for Lean Construction ( IGLC ).
Vrijhoef, Ruben ; Koskela, Lauri. / Revisiting the Three Peculiarities of Production in Construction. 13th International Group for Lean Construction Conference. International Group for Lean Construction ( IGLC ), 2005. pp. 19-27
@inproceedings{39e0772bcc34479c9557d9081b4d6c42,
title = "Revisiting the Three Peculiarities of Production in Construction",
abstract = "Compared to many other industries, construction is a specific type of project industry with certain peculiarities influencing the characteristics of constructed products, ways of production, and the indus try itself. Previously three major peculiarities of production in construction have been discussed, i.e. site production (i.e. organising the production around the product dependent on outdoor conditions), temporary production organisation (e.g. fragmented supply chain), and one-of-a kind product (e.g. de sign-to-order project-based production). Many times, particularly within the realms of lean construc tion, the basic hypothesis has been that these peculiarities lead to variability and thus to waste, and low performance levels in terms of productivity and value delivery to clients. Inversely, lean construction should be aimed at the banning of waste, thus reduction of variability, and thus the reduction or even resolution of peculiarities. In this paper, the peculiarities of production in construction are discussed and whether they always cause problems, whether they are always leading to waste, and whether they always can and need to be reduced or resolved. Some examples of solutions resolving or reducing certain peculiarities are given, such as modular housing, pre-engineered buildings and off-site production. Based on the examples, the effects and costs of reduction and resolution of peculiarities are discussed. To conclude it is discussed whether construction must and can always be improved by resolving the peculiarities, and at what cost. It is concluded that peculiarities should be resolved when they are not needed. However, before to decide to do so, the additional costs or even the potential value loss that may be caused by peculiarities must always be related to the whole life costs and value of the object built, and the extra costs and efforts for resolving the peculiarities. Finally, issues for future research are given.",
keywords = "Construction, Peculiarities, Repetitiveness, Resolution, Waste",
author = "Ruben Vrijhoef and Lauri Koskela",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
isbn = "1877040347",
pages = "19--27",
booktitle = "13th International Group for Lean Construction Conference",
publisher = "International Group for Lean Construction ( IGLC )",

}

Vrijhoef, R & Koskela, L 2005, Revisiting the Three Peculiarities of Production in Construction. in 13th International Group for Lean Construction Conference. International Group for Lean Construction ( IGLC ), pp. 19-27, 13th International Group for Lean Construction Conference, Sydney, Australia, 19/07/05.

Revisiting the Three Peculiarities of Production in Construction. / Vrijhoef, Ruben; Koskela, Lauri.

13th International Group for Lean Construction Conference. International Group for Lean Construction ( IGLC ), 2005. p. 19-27.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Revisiting the Three Peculiarities of Production in Construction

AU - Vrijhoef, Ruben

AU - Koskela, Lauri

PY - 2005/12/1

Y1 - 2005/12/1

N2 - Compared to many other industries, construction is a specific type of project industry with certain peculiarities influencing the characteristics of constructed products, ways of production, and the indus try itself. Previously three major peculiarities of production in construction have been discussed, i.e. site production (i.e. organising the production around the product dependent on outdoor conditions), temporary production organisation (e.g. fragmented supply chain), and one-of-a kind product (e.g. de sign-to-order project-based production). Many times, particularly within the realms of lean construc tion, the basic hypothesis has been that these peculiarities lead to variability and thus to waste, and low performance levels in terms of productivity and value delivery to clients. Inversely, lean construction should be aimed at the banning of waste, thus reduction of variability, and thus the reduction or even resolution of peculiarities. In this paper, the peculiarities of production in construction are discussed and whether they always cause problems, whether they are always leading to waste, and whether they always can and need to be reduced or resolved. Some examples of solutions resolving or reducing certain peculiarities are given, such as modular housing, pre-engineered buildings and off-site production. Based on the examples, the effects and costs of reduction and resolution of peculiarities are discussed. To conclude it is discussed whether construction must and can always be improved by resolving the peculiarities, and at what cost. It is concluded that peculiarities should be resolved when they are not needed. However, before to decide to do so, the additional costs or even the potential value loss that may be caused by peculiarities must always be related to the whole life costs and value of the object built, and the extra costs and efforts for resolving the peculiarities. Finally, issues for future research are given.

AB - Compared to many other industries, construction is a specific type of project industry with certain peculiarities influencing the characteristics of constructed products, ways of production, and the indus try itself. Previously three major peculiarities of production in construction have been discussed, i.e. site production (i.e. organising the production around the product dependent on outdoor conditions), temporary production organisation (e.g. fragmented supply chain), and one-of-a kind product (e.g. de sign-to-order project-based production). Many times, particularly within the realms of lean construc tion, the basic hypothesis has been that these peculiarities lead to variability and thus to waste, and low performance levels in terms of productivity and value delivery to clients. Inversely, lean construction should be aimed at the banning of waste, thus reduction of variability, and thus the reduction or even resolution of peculiarities. In this paper, the peculiarities of production in construction are discussed and whether they always cause problems, whether they are always leading to waste, and whether they always can and need to be reduced or resolved. Some examples of solutions resolving or reducing certain peculiarities are given, such as modular housing, pre-engineered buildings and off-site production. Based on the examples, the effects and costs of reduction and resolution of peculiarities are discussed. To conclude it is discussed whether construction must and can always be improved by resolving the peculiarities, and at what cost. It is concluded that peculiarities should be resolved when they are not needed. However, before to decide to do so, the additional costs or even the potential value loss that may be caused by peculiarities must always be related to the whole life costs and value of the object built, and the extra costs and efforts for resolving the peculiarities. Finally, issues for future research are given.

KW - Construction

KW - Peculiarities

KW - Repetitiveness

KW - Resolution

KW - Waste

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866076650&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 1877040347

SN - 9781877040344

SP - 19

EP - 27

BT - 13th International Group for Lean Construction Conference

PB - International Group for Lean Construction ( IGLC )

ER -

Vrijhoef R, Koskela L. Revisiting the Three Peculiarities of Production in Construction. In 13th International Group for Lean Construction Conference. International Group for Lean Construction ( IGLC ). 2005. p. 19-27