Rewarding altruism

Addressing the issue of payments for volunteers in public health initiatives

Jane South, Martin E. Purcell, Peter Branney, Mark Gamsu, Judy White

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Lay involvement in public health programmes occurs through formalised lay health worker (LHW) and other volunteer roles. Whether such participation should be supported, or indeed rewarded, by payment is a critical question. With reference to policy in England, UK, this paper argues how framing citizen involvement in health only as time freely given does not account for the complexities of practice, nor intrinsic motivations. The paper reports results on payment drawn from a study of approaches to support lay people in public health roles, conducted in England, 2007-9. The first phase of the study comprised a scoping review of 224 publications, three public hearings and a register of projects. Findings revealed the diversity of approaches to payment, but also the contested nature of the topic. The second phase investigated programme support matters in five case studies of public health projects, which were selected primarily to reflect role types. All five projects involved volunteers, with two utilising forms of payment to support engagement. Interviews were conducted with a sample of project staff, LHWs (paid and unpaid), external partners and service users. Drawing on both lay and professional perspectives, the paper explores how payment relates to social context as well as various motivations for giving, receiving or declining financial support. The findings show that personal costs are not always absorbed, and that there is a potential conflict between financial support, whether sessional payment or expenses, and welfare benefits. In identifying some of the advantages and disadvantages of payment, the paper highlights the complexity of an issue often addressed only superficially. It concludes that, in order to support citizen involvement, fairness and value should be considered alongside pragmatic matters of programme management; however policy conflicts need to be resolved to ensure that employment and welfare rights are maintained.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)80-87
Number of pages8
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume104
Early online date16 Dec 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Altruism
altruism
Financial Support
Volunteers
Public Health
public health
citizens' involvement
England
Motivation
welfare
Health
conflict potential
Hearing
Publications
intrinsic motivation
health
Interviews
fairness
Costs and Cost Analysis
pragmatics

Cite this

@article{ae72951805794bbca4721bb127fcfbe0,
title = "Rewarding altruism: Addressing the issue of payments for volunteers in public health initiatives",
abstract = "Lay involvement in public health programmes occurs through formalised lay health worker (LHW) and other volunteer roles. Whether such participation should be supported, or indeed rewarded, by payment is a critical question. With reference to policy in England, UK, this paper argues how framing citizen involvement in health only as time freely given does not account for the complexities of practice, nor intrinsic motivations. The paper reports results on payment drawn from a study of approaches to support lay people in public health roles, conducted in England, 2007-9. The first phase of the study comprised a scoping review of 224 publications, three public hearings and a register of projects. Findings revealed the diversity of approaches to payment, but also the contested nature of the topic. The second phase investigated programme support matters in five case studies of public health projects, which were selected primarily to reflect role types. All five projects involved volunteers, with two utilising forms of payment to support engagement. Interviews were conducted with a sample of project staff, LHWs (paid and unpaid), external partners and service users. Drawing on both lay and professional perspectives, the paper explores how payment relates to social context as well as various motivations for giving, receiving or declining financial support. The findings show that personal costs are not always absorbed, and that there is a potential conflict between financial support, whether sessional payment or expenses, and welfare benefits. In identifying some of the advantages and disadvantages of payment, the paper highlights the complexity of an issue often addressed only superficially. It concludes that, in order to support citizen involvement, fairness and value should be considered alongside pragmatic matters of programme management; however policy conflicts need to be resolved to ensure that employment and welfare rights are maintained.",
keywords = "Expenses, Health inequalities, Lay health workers, Payment, Public policy, Qualitative research, United Kingdom, Volunteering",
author = "Jane South and Purcell, {Martin E.} and Peter Branney and Mark Gamsu and Judy White",
note = "No full text in Eprints. HN 17/11/2017",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.11.058",
language = "English",
volume = "104",
pages = "80--87",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

Rewarding altruism : Addressing the issue of payments for volunteers in public health initiatives. / South, Jane; Purcell, Martin E.; Branney, Peter; Gamsu, Mark; White, Judy.

In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 104, 03.2014, p. 80-87.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rewarding altruism

T2 - Addressing the issue of payments for volunteers in public health initiatives

AU - South, Jane

AU - Purcell, Martin E.

AU - Branney, Peter

AU - Gamsu, Mark

AU - White, Judy

N1 - No full text in Eprints. HN 17/11/2017

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - Lay involvement in public health programmes occurs through formalised lay health worker (LHW) and other volunteer roles. Whether such participation should be supported, or indeed rewarded, by payment is a critical question. With reference to policy in England, UK, this paper argues how framing citizen involvement in health only as time freely given does not account for the complexities of practice, nor intrinsic motivations. The paper reports results on payment drawn from a study of approaches to support lay people in public health roles, conducted in England, 2007-9. The first phase of the study comprised a scoping review of 224 publications, three public hearings and a register of projects. Findings revealed the diversity of approaches to payment, but also the contested nature of the topic. The second phase investigated programme support matters in five case studies of public health projects, which were selected primarily to reflect role types. All five projects involved volunteers, with two utilising forms of payment to support engagement. Interviews were conducted with a sample of project staff, LHWs (paid and unpaid), external partners and service users. Drawing on both lay and professional perspectives, the paper explores how payment relates to social context as well as various motivations for giving, receiving or declining financial support. The findings show that personal costs are not always absorbed, and that there is a potential conflict between financial support, whether sessional payment or expenses, and welfare benefits. In identifying some of the advantages and disadvantages of payment, the paper highlights the complexity of an issue often addressed only superficially. It concludes that, in order to support citizen involvement, fairness and value should be considered alongside pragmatic matters of programme management; however policy conflicts need to be resolved to ensure that employment and welfare rights are maintained.

AB - Lay involvement in public health programmes occurs through formalised lay health worker (LHW) and other volunteer roles. Whether such participation should be supported, or indeed rewarded, by payment is a critical question. With reference to policy in England, UK, this paper argues how framing citizen involvement in health only as time freely given does not account for the complexities of practice, nor intrinsic motivations. The paper reports results on payment drawn from a study of approaches to support lay people in public health roles, conducted in England, 2007-9. The first phase of the study comprised a scoping review of 224 publications, three public hearings and a register of projects. Findings revealed the diversity of approaches to payment, but also the contested nature of the topic. The second phase investigated programme support matters in five case studies of public health projects, which were selected primarily to reflect role types. All five projects involved volunteers, with two utilising forms of payment to support engagement. Interviews were conducted with a sample of project staff, LHWs (paid and unpaid), external partners and service users. Drawing on both lay and professional perspectives, the paper explores how payment relates to social context as well as various motivations for giving, receiving or declining financial support. The findings show that personal costs are not always absorbed, and that there is a potential conflict between financial support, whether sessional payment or expenses, and welfare benefits. In identifying some of the advantages and disadvantages of payment, the paper highlights the complexity of an issue often addressed only superficially. It concludes that, in order to support citizen involvement, fairness and value should be considered alongside pragmatic matters of programme management; however policy conflicts need to be resolved to ensure that employment and welfare rights are maintained.

KW - Expenses

KW - Health inequalities

KW - Lay health workers

KW - Payment

KW - Public policy

KW - Qualitative research

KW - United Kingdom

KW - Volunteering

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894440204&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.11.058

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.11.058

M3 - Article

VL - 104

SP - 80

EP - 87

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

ER -