Ritual, aggression, and participatory ambiguity: A case study of heckling

Dániel Z. Kádár, Siân Robinson Davies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper analyses the phenomenon of participatory ambiguity in aggressive ritualistic interactions. One can ‘participate’ (Goffman 1979, 1981) in an interaction in different statuses, and these statuses entail different interactional constraints and obligations, also within the realms of language aggression and conflict. We are interested in a specific aspect of participation, namely ratification — the assumed right to participate in an interaction. ‘Ambiguity’ describes forms of behaviour which deviate from participant and observer expectations of interacting in certain discursive roles, without clearly violating (un)ratified participation roles. Examining the relationship between participatory ambiguity and language aggression fills an important knowledge gap in the field, as this area has been relatively ignored. We take heckling in experimental performing arts as a case study.
LanguageEnglish
Pages202-233
Number of pages32
JournalJournal of Language Aggression and Conflict
Volume4
Issue number2
Early online date16 Dec 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

aggression
religious behavior
interaction
participation
ratification
knowledge gap
language
obligation
art

Cite this

Kádár, Dániel Z. ; Davies, Siân Robinson. / Ritual, aggression, and participatory ambiguity : A case study of heckling. In: Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict. 2016 ; Vol. 4, No. 2. pp. 202-233.
@article{58cacb85072049d1ad6987b628824538,
title = "Ritual, aggression, and participatory ambiguity: A case study of heckling",
abstract = "This paper analyses the phenomenon of participatory ambiguity in aggressive ritualistic interactions. One can ‘participate’ (Goffman 1979, 1981) in an interaction in different statuses, and these statuses entail different interactional constraints and obligations, also within the realms of language aggression and conflict. We are interested in a specific aspect of participation, namely ratification — the assumed right to participate in an interaction. ‘Ambiguity’ describes forms of behaviour which deviate from participant and observer expectations of interacting in certain discursive roles, without clearly violating (un)ratified participation roles. Examining the relationship between participatory ambiguity and language aggression fills an important knowledge gap in the field, as this area has been relatively ignored. We take heckling in experimental performing arts as a case study.",
keywords = "heckling, participatory ambiguity, performing arts, ritual",
author = "K{\'a}d{\'a}r, {D{\'a}niel Z.} and Davies, {Si{\^a}n Robinson}",
note = "Accepted date taken from eprints as not available on publisher's website. SH 29/8/17.",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1075/jlac.4.2",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "202--233",
journal = "Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict",
issn = "2213-1272",
publisher = "John Benjamins Publishing",
number = "2",

}

Ritual, aggression, and participatory ambiguity : A case study of heckling. / Kádár, Dániel Z.; Davies, Siân Robinson.

In: Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2016, p. 202-233.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ritual, aggression, and participatory ambiguity

T2 - Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict

AU - Kádár, Dániel Z.

AU - Davies, Siân Robinson

N1 - Accepted date taken from eprints as not available on publisher's website. SH 29/8/17.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This paper analyses the phenomenon of participatory ambiguity in aggressive ritualistic interactions. One can ‘participate’ (Goffman 1979, 1981) in an interaction in different statuses, and these statuses entail different interactional constraints and obligations, also within the realms of language aggression and conflict. We are interested in a specific aspect of participation, namely ratification — the assumed right to participate in an interaction. ‘Ambiguity’ describes forms of behaviour which deviate from participant and observer expectations of interacting in certain discursive roles, without clearly violating (un)ratified participation roles. Examining the relationship between participatory ambiguity and language aggression fills an important knowledge gap in the field, as this area has been relatively ignored. We take heckling in experimental performing arts as a case study.

AB - This paper analyses the phenomenon of participatory ambiguity in aggressive ritualistic interactions. One can ‘participate’ (Goffman 1979, 1981) in an interaction in different statuses, and these statuses entail different interactional constraints and obligations, also within the realms of language aggression and conflict. We are interested in a specific aspect of participation, namely ratification — the assumed right to participate in an interaction. ‘Ambiguity’ describes forms of behaviour which deviate from participant and observer expectations of interacting in certain discursive roles, without clearly violating (un)ratified participation roles. Examining the relationship between participatory ambiguity and language aggression fills an important knowledge gap in the field, as this area has been relatively ignored. We take heckling in experimental performing arts as a case study.

KW - heckling

KW - participatory ambiguity

KW - performing arts

KW - ritual

U2 - 10.1075/jlac.4.2

DO - 10.1075/jlac.4.2

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 202

EP - 233

JO - Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict

JF - Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict

SN - 2213-1272

IS - 2

ER -