Safety management theory and the expeditionary organization

A critical theoretical reflection

Matthijs Moorkamp, Eric Hans Kramer, Coen van Gulijk, Ben Ale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Management of safety within organizations has become a key topic within safety science. Theorizing on this subject covers a diverse pallet of concepts such as "resilience" and "safety management systems". Recent studies indicate that safety management theory has deficiencies. Our interpretation of these deficiencies is that much confusion originates from the issue that crucial meta-theoretical assumptions are mostly implicit or applied inconsistently. In particular, we argue that these meta-theoretical assumptions are of a systems theoretical nature. Therefore, we provide a framework that will be able to explicate and reflect on systems theoretical assumptions. With this framework, we analyze the ability of two frequently used safety management theories to tackle the problem of managing safety of Dutch military expeditionary organizations. This paper will show that inconsistent and implicit application of systems theoretical assumptions in these safety management theories results in problems to tackle such a practical problem adequately. We conclude with a reflection on the pros and cons of our framework. Also, we suggest particular meta-theoretical aspects that seem to be essential for applying safety management theory to organizations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)71-81
Number of pages11
JournalSafety Science
Volume69
Early online date18 Jun 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Safety Management
Organizations
organization
management
Safety
Pallets
resilience
Military
interpretation
ability
science

Cite this

Moorkamp, Matthijs ; Kramer, Eric Hans ; van Gulijk, Coen ; Ale, Ben. / Safety management theory and the expeditionary organization : A critical theoretical reflection. In: Safety Science. 2014 ; Vol. 69. pp. 71-81.
@article{77c0d389f4f1483f93a31569bed6b3cd,
title = "Safety management theory and the expeditionary organization: A critical theoretical reflection",
abstract = "Management of safety within organizations has become a key topic within safety science. Theorizing on this subject covers a diverse pallet of concepts such as {"}resilience{"} and {"}safety management systems{"}. Recent studies indicate that safety management theory has deficiencies. Our interpretation of these deficiencies is that much confusion originates from the issue that crucial meta-theoretical assumptions are mostly implicit or applied inconsistently. In particular, we argue that these meta-theoretical assumptions are of a systems theoretical nature. Therefore, we provide a framework that will be able to explicate and reflect on systems theoretical assumptions. With this framework, we analyze the ability of two frequently used safety management theories to tackle the problem of managing safety of Dutch military expeditionary organizations. This paper will show that inconsistent and implicit application of systems theoretical assumptions in these safety management theories results in problems to tackle such a practical problem adequately. We conclude with a reflection on the pros and cons of our framework. Also, we suggest particular meta-theoretical aspects that seem to be essential for applying safety management theory to organizations.",
keywords = "General systems theory, Military operations, Resilience engineering, Safety management systems, Safety management theory",
author = "Matthijs Moorkamp and Kramer, {Eric Hans} and {van Gulijk}, Coen and Ben Ale",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.ssci.2014.05.014",
language = "English",
volume = "69",
pages = "71--81",
journal = "Safety Science",
issn = "0925-7535",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Safety management theory and the expeditionary organization : A critical theoretical reflection. / Moorkamp, Matthijs; Kramer, Eric Hans; van Gulijk, Coen; Ale, Ben.

In: Safety Science, Vol. 69, 11.2014, p. 71-81.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Safety management theory and the expeditionary organization

T2 - A critical theoretical reflection

AU - Moorkamp, Matthijs

AU - Kramer, Eric Hans

AU - van Gulijk, Coen

AU - Ale, Ben

PY - 2014/11

Y1 - 2014/11

N2 - Management of safety within organizations has become a key topic within safety science. Theorizing on this subject covers a diverse pallet of concepts such as "resilience" and "safety management systems". Recent studies indicate that safety management theory has deficiencies. Our interpretation of these deficiencies is that much confusion originates from the issue that crucial meta-theoretical assumptions are mostly implicit or applied inconsistently. In particular, we argue that these meta-theoretical assumptions are of a systems theoretical nature. Therefore, we provide a framework that will be able to explicate and reflect on systems theoretical assumptions. With this framework, we analyze the ability of two frequently used safety management theories to tackle the problem of managing safety of Dutch military expeditionary organizations. This paper will show that inconsistent and implicit application of systems theoretical assumptions in these safety management theories results in problems to tackle such a practical problem adequately. We conclude with a reflection on the pros and cons of our framework. Also, we suggest particular meta-theoretical aspects that seem to be essential for applying safety management theory to organizations.

AB - Management of safety within organizations has become a key topic within safety science. Theorizing on this subject covers a diverse pallet of concepts such as "resilience" and "safety management systems". Recent studies indicate that safety management theory has deficiencies. Our interpretation of these deficiencies is that much confusion originates from the issue that crucial meta-theoretical assumptions are mostly implicit or applied inconsistently. In particular, we argue that these meta-theoretical assumptions are of a systems theoretical nature. Therefore, we provide a framework that will be able to explicate and reflect on systems theoretical assumptions. With this framework, we analyze the ability of two frequently used safety management theories to tackle the problem of managing safety of Dutch military expeditionary organizations. This paper will show that inconsistent and implicit application of systems theoretical assumptions in these safety management theories results in problems to tackle such a practical problem adequately. We conclude with a reflection on the pros and cons of our framework. Also, we suggest particular meta-theoretical aspects that seem to be essential for applying safety management theory to organizations.

KW - General systems theory

KW - Military operations

KW - Resilience engineering

KW - Safety management systems

KW - Safety management theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903905383&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.05.014

DO - 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.05.014

M3 - Article

VL - 69

SP - 71

EP - 81

JO - Safety Science

JF - Safety Science

SN - 0925-7535

ER -