Safety vs. sustainability design: Analogies, differences and potential synergies

Guillermo Rodriguez-Navas; Leticia Duboc; Stefanie Betz; Ruzanna Chitchyan; Birgit Penzenstadler; Colin C. Venters

Safety vs. sustainability design: Analogies, differences and potential synergies

Guillermo Rodriguez-Navas, Leticia Duboc, Stefanie Betz, Ruzanna Chitchyan, Birgit Penzenstadler, Colin C. Venters

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Abstract

The idea that there are important parallels between safety and sustainability and that software engineers might be able to take lessons learned from safety and apply them to sustainability has been voiced and initially explored before. This paper extends the analysis of similarities, differences, and potential synergies between the two concepts, according to four different dimensions of these domains: systemicity, complexity, certification and social perception.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	25-34
Number of pages	10
Journal	CEUR Workshop Proceedings
Volume	1416
Publication status	Published - 2015

Access to Document

Link to publication in Scopus

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Safety vs. sustainability design: Analogies, differences and potential synergies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Rodriguez-Navas, G., Duboc, L., Betz, S., Chitchyan, R., Penzenstadler, B., & Venters, C. C. (2015). Safety vs. sustainability design: Analogies, differences and potential synergies. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 1416, 25-34.

@article{7556bc69e30144dab85a667f69e25dab,

title = "Safety vs. sustainability design: Analogies, differences and potential synergies",

abstract = "The idea that there are important parallels between safety and sustainability and that software engineers might be able to take lessons learned from safety and apply them to sustainability has been voiced and initially explored before. This paper extends the analysis of similarities, differences, and potential synergies between the two concepts, according to four different dimensions of these domains: systemicity, complexity, certification and social perception.",

keywords = "Non-functional requirements, Safety, Sustainability",

author = "Guillermo Rodriguez-Navas and Leticia Duboc and Stefanie Betz and Ruzanna Chitchyan and Birgit Penzenstadler and Venters, {Colin C.}",

year = "2015",

language = "English",

volume = "1416",

pages = "25--34",

journal = "CEUR Workshop Proceedings",

issn = "1613-0073",

publisher = "CEUR Workshop Proceedings",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Safety vs. sustainability design

T2 - Analogies, differences and potential synergies

AU - Rodriguez-Navas, Guillermo

AU - Duboc, Leticia

AU - Betz, Stefanie

AU - Chitchyan, Ruzanna

AU - Penzenstadler, Birgit

AU - Venters, Colin C.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The idea that there are important parallels between safety and sustainability and that software engineers might be able to take lessons learned from safety and apply them to sustainability has been voiced and initially explored before. This paper extends the analysis of similarities, differences, and potential synergies between the two concepts, according to four different dimensions of these domains: systemicity, complexity, certification and social perception.

AB - The idea that there are important parallels between safety and sustainability and that software engineers might be able to take lessons learned from safety and apply them to sustainability has been voiced and initially explored before. This paper extends the analysis of similarities, differences, and potential synergies between the two concepts, according to four different dimensions of these domains: systemicity, complexity, certification and social perception.

KW - Non-functional requirements

KW - Safety

KW - Sustainability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940052632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84940052632

VL - 1416

SP - 25

EP - 34

JO - CEUR Workshop Proceedings

JF - CEUR Workshop Proceedings

SN - 1613-0073

ER -