Abstract
The idea that there are important parallels between safety and sustainability and that software engineers might be able to take lessons learned from safety and apply them to sustainability has been voiced and initially explored before. This paper extends the analysis of similarities, differences, and potential synergies between the two concepts, according to four different dimensions of these domains: systemicity, complexity, certification and social perception.
| Language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages | 25-34 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | CEUR Workshop Proceedings |
| Volume | 1416 |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Fingerprint
Cite this
}
Safety vs. sustainability design : Analogies, differences and potential synergies. / Rodriguez-Navas, Guillermo; Duboc, Leticia; Betz, Stefanie; Chitchyan, Ruzanna; Penzenstadler, Birgit; Venters, Colin C.
In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 1416, 2015, p. 25-34.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - Safety vs. sustainability design
T2 - CEUR Workshop Proceedings
AU - Rodriguez-Navas, Guillermo
AU - Duboc, Leticia
AU - Betz, Stefanie
AU - Chitchyan, Ruzanna
AU - Penzenstadler, Birgit
AU - Venters, Colin C.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - The idea that there are important parallels between safety and sustainability and that software engineers might be able to take lessons learned from safety and apply them to sustainability has been voiced and initially explored before. This paper extends the analysis of similarities, differences, and potential synergies between the two concepts, according to four different dimensions of these domains: systemicity, complexity, certification and social perception.
AB - The idea that there are important parallels between safety and sustainability and that software engineers might be able to take lessons learned from safety and apply them to sustainability has been voiced and initially explored before. This paper extends the analysis of similarities, differences, and potential synergies between the two concepts, according to four different dimensions of these domains: systemicity, complexity, certification and social perception.
KW - Non-functional requirements
KW - Safety
KW - Sustainability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940052632&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
VL - 1416
SP - 25
EP - 34
JO - CEUR Workshop Proceedings
JF - CEUR Workshop Proceedings
SN - 1613-0073
ER -