“Sakura” has not grown in a day

infrastructure investment and economic growth in Japan under different tax regimes

Emmanuel Apergis, Nicholas Apergis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper explores whether the validity of infrastructure investment serves as a procyclical or anticyclical instrument to counter a recession in the case of the Japanese economy.Infrastructure consumption is usually financed by taxes. For that reason, this paper accounts for the presence of alternative tax regimes. Namely, we have chosen regimes under Total Taxation, Capital Taxation, Corporate (Income) Taxation, Household Income Taxation and Indirect Taxation (valued added tax) to identify different policy outcomes under different regimes. The results indicate that when infrastructure is financed by different taxation across all its variations there is a negative relationship with GDP which is robust when the same estimation procedure is explored for industrial production. The trade-offs of a negative relationship, however, come with a lesser duration of the industrial production recession. The empirical results indicate that trying to get out of recession with infrastructure investment is underutilization of resources and does not touch the real issues that caused the recession.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)541-567
Number of pages27
JournalEmpirical Economics
Volume57
Issue number2
Early online date14 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Taxation
Economic Growth
Tax
taxation
Japan
taxes
economic growth
Infrastructure
infrastructure
recession
industrial production
regime
estimation procedure
household income
Recession
Economic growth
Infrastructure investment
Trade-offs
income
Resources

Cite this

@article{be2dbca38e054f95964534381c12fe91,
title = "“Sakura” has not grown in a day: infrastructure investment and economic growth in Japan under different tax regimes",
abstract = "This paper explores whether the validity of infrastructure investment serves as a procyclical or anticyclical instrument to counter a recession in the case of the Japanese economy.Infrastructure consumption is usually financed by taxes. For that reason, this paper accounts for the presence of alternative tax regimes. Namely, we have chosen regimes under Total Taxation, Capital Taxation, Corporate (Income) Taxation, Household Income Taxation and Indirect Taxation (valued added tax) to identify different policy outcomes under different regimes. The results indicate that when infrastructure is financed by different taxation across all its variations there is a negative relationship with GDP which is robust when the same estimation procedure is explored for industrial production. The trade-offs of a negative relationship, however, come with a lesser duration of the industrial production recession. The empirical results indicate that trying to get out of recession with infrastructure investment is underutilization of resources and does not touch the real issues that caused the recession.",
keywords = "Economic growth, Infrastructure policy, Japan, Markov switch dynamic regression, Tax regimes",
author = "Emmanuel Apergis and Nicholas Apergis",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1007/s00181-018-1481-0",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "541--567",
journal = "Empirical Economics",
issn = "0377-7332",
publisher = "Physica-Verlag",
number = "2",

}

“Sakura” has not grown in a day : infrastructure investment and economic growth in Japan under different tax regimes. / Apergis, Emmanuel; Apergis, Nicholas.

In: Empirical Economics, Vol. 57, No. 2, 08.2019, p. 541-567.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - “Sakura” has not grown in a day

T2 - infrastructure investment and economic growth in Japan under different tax regimes

AU - Apergis, Emmanuel

AU - Apergis, Nicholas

PY - 2019/8

Y1 - 2019/8

N2 - This paper explores whether the validity of infrastructure investment serves as a procyclical or anticyclical instrument to counter a recession in the case of the Japanese economy.Infrastructure consumption is usually financed by taxes. For that reason, this paper accounts for the presence of alternative tax regimes. Namely, we have chosen regimes under Total Taxation, Capital Taxation, Corporate (Income) Taxation, Household Income Taxation and Indirect Taxation (valued added tax) to identify different policy outcomes under different regimes. The results indicate that when infrastructure is financed by different taxation across all its variations there is a negative relationship with GDP which is robust when the same estimation procedure is explored for industrial production. The trade-offs of a negative relationship, however, come with a lesser duration of the industrial production recession. The empirical results indicate that trying to get out of recession with infrastructure investment is underutilization of resources and does not touch the real issues that caused the recession.

AB - This paper explores whether the validity of infrastructure investment serves as a procyclical or anticyclical instrument to counter a recession in the case of the Japanese economy.Infrastructure consumption is usually financed by taxes. For that reason, this paper accounts for the presence of alternative tax regimes. Namely, we have chosen regimes under Total Taxation, Capital Taxation, Corporate (Income) Taxation, Household Income Taxation and Indirect Taxation (valued added tax) to identify different policy outcomes under different regimes. The results indicate that when infrastructure is financed by different taxation across all its variations there is a negative relationship with GDP which is robust when the same estimation procedure is explored for industrial production. The trade-offs of a negative relationship, however, come with a lesser duration of the industrial production recession. The empirical results indicate that trying to get out of recession with infrastructure investment is underutilization of resources and does not touch the real issues that caused the recession.

KW - Economic growth

KW - Infrastructure policy

KW - Japan

KW - Markov switch dynamic regression

KW - Tax regimes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048588466&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00181-018-1481-0

DO - 10.1007/s00181-018-1481-0

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 541

EP - 567

JO - Empirical Economics

JF - Empirical Economics

SN - 0377-7332

IS - 2

ER -