Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Screen, Ration and Churn: Demand Management and the Crisis in Children’s Social Care

Rick Hood, Allie Goldacre, Sarah Gorin, Paul Bywaters

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article presents findings from a quantitative study of the national data-sets for statutory children's social care services in England. The aim of the study was to examine how demand management varied in local authorities with differing levels of area deprivation. About 152 local authorities census returns and other statistical indicators covering the period 2014-2017 were combined into a single data-set. Statistical analysis was undertaken to explore trends over time and correlations between indicators that might indicate patterns in the way demand was managed. Findings showed that high levels of deprivation have continued to be strongly linked to high levels of activity and that local authorities have continued to increase their use of protective interventions relative to referrals. Evidence was found for three interconnected mechanisms, through which local authorities tended to manage demand for services: Screening, rationing and workforce churn. The article describes these mechanisms and comments on their significance for the current crisis of demand in the sector.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)868-889
Number of pages22
JournalBritish Journal of Social Work
Volume50
Issue number3
Early online date10 Apr 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 1 - No Poverty
    SDG 1 No Poverty
  2. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
  3. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Screen, Ration and Churn: Demand Management and the Crisis in Children’s Social Care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this