Abstract
Trade credit has only recently been taken seriously by business ethicists, despite the common practice of slow payment of suppliers. In response, the UK has introduced a series of voluntary 'payment codes'. However, at the time to which our data relate, relatively few FTSE 100 companies had signed up. Furthermore, although signatories paid more quickly, the difference was not statistically significant. These two findings might appear to suggest that payment codes are ineffective. However, some companies claimed to be following a code which was defunct. Their payment speed was indistinguishable from non-signatories, but those that had signed the extant code paid significantly more quickly. Our findings not only suggest that a payment code might be effective but also show a result relevant to codes of ethics more generally - that there might be signs that a company is not taking a code seriously, which we identify with the notion of hypocrisy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 153-168 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 15 Jan 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Settling debts in the supply chain: do prompt payment codes make a difference? A UK study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver