Sexual violence and free speech in popular music

Rosemary Lucy Hill, Heather Savigny

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article re-examines the use of arguments in favour of free speech when faced with difficult subjects in music, such as sexual violence against women. We present a new perspective on the 1985 US Senate Hearing on Record Labeling and challenge the orthodoxy that the Hearing was only a matter of free speech. Using critical discourse analysis we argue that the sexist environment of the Hearing, the misogyny of the musicians, plus homosocial bonding resulted in the PMRC’s arguments being unaddressed as attention turned to censorship. Subsequent academic work has continued to focus on censorship, neglecting to investigate how music can propagate dangerous representations. This article indicates the need for a shift in popular music studies towards careful consideration of those aspects which are difficult and dangerous for women. It therefore opens up popular music to important new areas for critical examination and feminist analysis.
LanguageEnglish
Pages237-251
Number of pages15
JournalPopular Music
Volume38
Issue number2
Early online date1 May 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2019

Fingerprint

sexual violence
music
censorship
musician
senate
discourse analysis
examination
Popular music
Hearing
Sexual Violence
Freedom of Speech
Music
Censorship
Violence against Women
Labeling
Orthodoxy
Misogyny
Musicians
U.S. Senate
Critical Discourse Analysis

Cite this

Hill, Rosemary Lucy ; Savigny, Heather. / Sexual violence and free speech in popular music. In: Popular Music. 2019 ; Vol. 38, No. 2. pp. 237-251.
@article{236c789152b541188f8378f2ac81bfcb,
title = "Sexual violence and free speech in popular music",
abstract = "This article re-examines the use of arguments in favour of free speech when faced with difficult subjects in music, such as sexual violence against women. We present a new perspective on the 1985 US Senate Hearing on Record Labeling and challenge the orthodoxy that the Hearing was only a matter of free speech. Using critical discourse analysis we argue that the sexist environment of the Hearing, the misogyny of the musicians, plus homosocial bonding resulted in the PMRC’s arguments being unaddressed as attention turned to censorship. Subsequent academic work has continued to focus on censorship, neglecting to investigate how music can propagate dangerous representations. This article indicates the need for a shift in popular music studies towards careful consideration of those aspects which are difficult and dangerous for women. It therefore opens up popular music to important new areas for critical examination and feminist analysis.",
keywords = "censorship, freedom of speech, heavy metal, PMRC, popular music, sexual violence",
author = "Hill, {Rosemary Lucy} and Heather Savigny",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0261143019000096",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "237--251",
journal = "Popular Music",
issn = "0261-1430",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

Sexual violence and free speech in popular music. / Hill, Rosemary Lucy; Savigny, Heather.

In: Popular Music, Vol. 38, No. 2, 01.05.2019, p. 237-251.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sexual violence and free speech in popular music

AU - Hill, Rosemary Lucy

AU - Savigny, Heather

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - This article re-examines the use of arguments in favour of free speech when faced with difficult subjects in music, such as sexual violence against women. We present a new perspective on the 1985 US Senate Hearing on Record Labeling and challenge the orthodoxy that the Hearing was only a matter of free speech. Using critical discourse analysis we argue that the sexist environment of the Hearing, the misogyny of the musicians, plus homosocial bonding resulted in the PMRC’s arguments being unaddressed as attention turned to censorship. Subsequent academic work has continued to focus on censorship, neglecting to investigate how music can propagate dangerous representations. This article indicates the need for a shift in popular music studies towards careful consideration of those aspects which are difficult and dangerous for women. It therefore opens up popular music to important new areas for critical examination and feminist analysis.

AB - This article re-examines the use of arguments in favour of free speech when faced with difficult subjects in music, such as sexual violence against women. We present a new perspective on the 1985 US Senate Hearing on Record Labeling and challenge the orthodoxy that the Hearing was only a matter of free speech. Using critical discourse analysis we argue that the sexist environment of the Hearing, the misogyny of the musicians, plus homosocial bonding resulted in the PMRC’s arguments being unaddressed as attention turned to censorship. Subsequent academic work has continued to focus on censorship, neglecting to investigate how music can propagate dangerous representations. This article indicates the need for a shift in popular music studies towards careful consideration of those aspects which are difficult and dangerous for women. It therefore opens up popular music to important new areas for critical examination and feminist analysis.

KW - censorship

KW - freedom of speech

KW - heavy metal

KW - PMRC

KW - popular music

KW - sexual violence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065096807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0261143019000096

DO - 10.1017/S0261143019000096

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 237

EP - 251

JO - Popular Music

T2 - Popular Music

JF - Popular Music

SN - 0261-1430

IS - 2

ER -