Shared decision making or paternalism in nursing consultations? A qualitative study of primary care asthma nurses' views on sharing decisions with patients regarding inhaler device selection

Jane Upton, Monica Fletcher, Hazel Madoc-Sutton, Aziz Sheikh, Ann Louise Caress, Samantha Walker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Although patients with asthma would like more involvement in the decision-making process, and UK government policy concerning chronic conditions supports shared decision making, it is not widely used in practice. Objective To investigate how nurses approach decision making in relation to inhaler choice and long-term inhaler use within a routine asthma consultation and to better understand the barriers and facilitators to shared decision making in practice. Setting and participants Semi-structured interviews were conducted with post-registration, qualified nurses who routinely undertook asthma consultations and were registered on a respiratory course. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using the Framework approach. Results Twenty participants were interviewed. Despite holding positive views about shared decision making, limited shared decision making was reported. Opportunities for patients to share decisions were only offered in relation to inhaler device, which were based on the nurse's pre-selected recommendations. Giving patients this 'choice' was seen as key to improving adherence. Discussion There is a discrepancy between nurses' understanding of shared decision making and the depictions of shared decision making presented in the academic literature and NHS policy. In this study, shared decision making was used as a tool to support the nurses' agenda, rather than as a natural expression of equality between the nurse and patient. Conclusion There is a misalignment between the goals of practice nurses and the rhetoric regarding patient empowerment. Shared decision making may therefore only be embraced if it improves patient outcomes. This study indicates attitudinal shifts and improvements in knowledge of 'shared decision-making' are needed if policy dictates are to be realised.

LanguageEnglish
Pages374-382
Number of pages9
JournalHealth Expectations
Volume14
Issue number4
Early online date16 Feb 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Paternalism
Nebulizers and Vaporizers
Primary Health Care
Decision Making
Nursing
Referral and Consultation
Asthma
Nurses
Equipment and Supplies
Interviews
Patient Participation

Cite this

@article{cf35e40d5a774c30b43b357721adfcd7,
title = "Shared decision making or paternalism in nursing consultations? A qualitative study of primary care asthma nurses' views on sharing decisions with patients regarding inhaler device selection",
abstract = "Background Although patients with asthma would like more involvement in the decision-making process, and UK government policy concerning chronic conditions supports shared decision making, it is not widely used in practice. Objective To investigate how nurses approach decision making in relation to inhaler choice and long-term inhaler use within a routine asthma consultation and to better understand the barriers and facilitators to shared decision making in practice. Setting and participants Semi-structured interviews were conducted with post-registration, qualified nurses who routinely undertook asthma consultations and were registered on a respiratory course. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using the Framework approach. Results Twenty participants were interviewed. Despite holding positive views about shared decision making, limited shared decision making was reported. Opportunities for patients to share decisions were only offered in relation to inhaler device, which were based on the nurse's pre-selected recommendations. Giving patients this 'choice' was seen as key to improving adherence. Discussion There is a discrepancy between nurses' understanding of shared decision making and the depictions of shared decision making presented in the academic literature and NHS policy. In this study, shared decision making was used as a tool to support the nurses' agenda, rather than as a natural expression of equality between the nurse and patient. Conclusion There is a misalignment between the goals of practice nurses and the rhetoric regarding patient empowerment. Shared decision making may therefore only be embraced if it improves patient outcomes. This study indicates attitudinal shifts and improvements in knowledge of 'shared decision-making' are needed if policy dictates are to be realised.",
keywords = "Asthma, Inhaler devices, Primary care, Shared decision making",
author = "Jane Upton and Monica Fletcher and Hazel Madoc-Sutton and Aziz Sheikh and Caress, {Ann Louise} and Samantha Walker",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00653.x",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "374--382",
journal = "Health Expectations",
issn = "1369-6513",
publisher = "Wiley Open Access",
number = "4",

}

Shared decision making or paternalism in nursing consultations? A qualitative study of primary care asthma nurses' views on sharing decisions with patients regarding inhaler device selection. / Upton, Jane; Fletcher, Monica; Madoc-Sutton, Hazel; Sheikh, Aziz; Caress, Ann Louise; Walker, Samantha.

In: Health Expectations, Vol. 14, No. 4, 01.12.2011, p. 374-382.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Shared decision making or paternalism in nursing consultations? A qualitative study of primary care asthma nurses' views on sharing decisions with patients regarding inhaler device selection

AU - Upton, Jane

AU - Fletcher, Monica

AU - Madoc-Sutton, Hazel

AU - Sheikh, Aziz

AU - Caress, Ann Louise

AU - Walker, Samantha

PY - 2011/12/1

Y1 - 2011/12/1

N2 - Background Although patients with asthma would like more involvement in the decision-making process, and UK government policy concerning chronic conditions supports shared decision making, it is not widely used in practice. Objective To investigate how nurses approach decision making in relation to inhaler choice and long-term inhaler use within a routine asthma consultation and to better understand the barriers and facilitators to shared decision making in practice. Setting and participants Semi-structured interviews were conducted with post-registration, qualified nurses who routinely undertook asthma consultations and were registered on a respiratory course. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using the Framework approach. Results Twenty participants were interviewed. Despite holding positive views about shared decision making, limited shared decision making was reported. Opportunities for patients to share decisions were only offered in relation to inhaler device, which were based on the nurse's pre-selected recommendations. Giving patients this 'choice' was seen as key to improving adherence. Discussion There is a discrepancy between nurses' understanding of shared decision making and the depictions of shared decision making presented in the academic literature and NHS policy. In this study, shared decision making was used as a tool to support the nurses' agenda, rather than as a natural expression of equality between the nurse and patient. Conclusion There is a misalignment between the goals of practice nurses and the rhetoric regarding patient empowerment. Shared decision making may therefore only be embraced if it improves patient outcomes. This study indicates attitudinal shifts and improvements in knowledge of 'shared decision-making' are needed if policy dictates are to be realised.

AB - Background Although patients with asthma would like more involvement in the decision-making process, and UK government policy concerning chronic conditions supports shared decision making, it is not widely used in practice. Objective To investigate how nurses approach decision making in relation to inhaler choice and long-term inhaler use within a routine asthma consultation and to better understand the barriers and facilitators to shared decision making in practice. Setting and participants Semi-structured interviews were conducted with post-registration, qualified nurses who routinely undertook asthma consultations and were registered on a respiratory course. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using the Framework approach. Results Twenty participants were interviewed. Despite holding positive views about shared decision making, limited shared decision making was reported. Opportunities for patients to share decisions were only offered in relation to inhaler device, which were based on the nurse's pre-selected recommendations. Giving patients this 'choice' was seen as key to improving adherence. Discussion There is a discrepancy between nurses' understanding of shared decision making and the depictions of shared decision making presented in the academic literature and NHS policy. In this study, shared decision making was used as a tool to support the nurses' agenda, rather than as a natural expression of equality between the nurse and patient. Conclusion There is a misalignment between the goals of practice nurses and the rhetoric regarding patient empowerment. Shared decision making may therefore only be embraced if it improves patient outcomes. This study indicates attitudinal shifts and improvements in knowledge of 'shared decision-making' are needed if policy dictates are to be realised.

KW - Asthma

KW - Inhaler devices

KW - Primary care

KW - Shared decision making

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=81355138103&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00653.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00653.x

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 374

EP - 382

JO - Health Expectations

T2 - Health Expectations

JF - Health Expectations

SN - 1369-6513

IS - 4

ER -