Shipper’s Title to Sue After the Transfer of the Bill of Lading: A Comparative Study for the Reform of Chinese Maritime Law

Tianyi Jiang, Zhen Jing

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Cargo interests’ title to sue the carrier to recover loss or damage caused by the carrier’s default is a crucial issue in carriage of goods by sea. However, the current maritime code in China does not provide explicit guidance on this issue. One significant problem that arises therefrom is whether the shipper who has transferred the bill of lading to the endorsee/consignee is still entitled to sue the carrier. This article critically examines the current rule under the Chinese Maritime Code 1993 and pinpoints the fundamental loophole that gives rise to the aforesaid problem. In addition, based on reviewing various solutions provided by other jurisdictions, this article discusses the possible solution that could be considered when reforming current maritime law in China.
LanguageEnglish
Pages155-182
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Maritime Law and Commerce
Volume48
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

maritime law
bill
reform
China
jurisdiction
damages

Cite this

@article{ccfd7942ecfb4e19b9b791a65667cae4,
title = "Shipper’s Title to Sue After the Transfer of the Bill of Lading: A Comparative Study for the Reform of Chinese Maritime Law",
abstract = "Cargo interests’ title to sue the carrier to recover loss or damage caused by the carrier’s default is a crucial issue in carriage of goods by sea. However, the current maritime code in China does not provide explicit guidance on this issue. One significant problem that arises therefrom is whether the shipper who has transferred the bill of lading to the endorsee/consignee is still entitled to sue the carrier. This article critically examines the current rule under the Chinese Maritime Code 1993 and pinpoints the fundamental loophole that gives rise to the aforesaid problem. In addition, based on reviewing various solutions provided by other jurisdictions, this article discusses the possible solution that could be considered when reforming current maritime law in China.",
keywords = "Title to sue, Cargo Claims, Chinese Maritime Code, Bill of Lading, Shipper",
author = "Tianyi Jiang and Zhen Jing",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "155--182",
journal = "Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce",
issn = "0022-2410",
publisher = "SPB Academic Publishing bv",
number = "2",

}

Shipper’s Title to Sue After the Transfer of the Bill of Lading : A Comparative Study for the Reform of Chinese Maritime Law. / Jiang, Tianyi; Jing, Zhen .

In: Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce, Vol. 48, No. 2, 04.2017, p. 155-182.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Shipper’s Title to Sue After the Transfer of the Bill of Lading

T2 - Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce

AU - Jiang, Tianyi

AU - Jing, Zhen

PY - 2017/4

Y1 - 2017/4

N2 - Cargo interests’ title to sue the carrier to recover loss or damage caused by the carrier’s default is a crucial issue in carriage of goods by sea. However, the current maritime code in China does not provide explicit guidance on this issue. One significant problem that arises therefrom is whether the shipper who has transferred the bill of lading to the endorsee/consignee is still entitled to sue the carrier. This article critically examines the current rule under the Chinese Maritime Code 1993 and pinpoints the fundamental loophole that gives rise to the aforesaid problem. In addition, based on reviewing various solutions provided by other jurisdictions, this article discusses the possible solution that could be considered when reforming current maritime law in China.

AB - Cargo interests’ title to sue the carrier to recover loss or damage caused by the carrier’s default is a crucial issue in carriage of goods by sea. However, the current maritime code in China does not provide explicit guidance on this issue. One significant problem that arises therefrom is whether the shipper who has transferred the bill of lading to the endorsee/consignee is still entitled to sue the carrier. This article critically examines the current rule under the Chinese Maritime Code 1993 and pinpoints the fundamental loophole that gives rise to the aforesaid problem. In addition, based on reviewing various solutions provided by other jurisdictions, this article discusses the possible solution that could be considered when reforming current maritime law in China.

KW - Title to sue

KW - Cargo Claims

KW - Chinese Maritime Code

KW - Bill of Lading

KW - Shipper

UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85026484373&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&st1=shipper%27s+title+to+sue&st2=&sid=d106473d28a2bdfc8cedd70331275267&sot=b&sdt=b&sl=37&s=TITLE-ABS-KEY%28shipper%27s+title+to+sue%29&relpos=0&citeCnt=0&searchTerm=

UR - https://www.jmlc.org/index.php

M3 - Review article

VL - 48

SP - 155

EP - 182

JO - Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce

JF - Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce

SN - 0022-2410

IS - 2

ER -