Simulation of wear on a rough rail using a time-domain wheel-track interaction model

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents results from simulations of railhead wear due to initial sinusoidal and broad-band roughness using a time-domain wheel-track vertical interaction model integrated with a three-dimensional wheel-rail contact model. As typical roughness wavelengths are short and frequencies are high compared with vehicle body motions, the vehicle is simplified to an unsprung wheel mass. The rail is modelled as a Timoshenko beam discretely supported by pads, sleepers and ballast. The wheel-rail contact in the interaction model is modelled with a non-linear Hertzian contact spring. The obtained wheel-rail forces are then incorporated into the three-dimensional contact model to calculate wear over the railhead. The wheel-rail contact is modelled as non-Hertzian and non-steady based on the Variational Method [G. Xie, S.D. Iwnicki, Calculation of wear on a corrugated rail using a three-dimensional contact model, in: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Contact Mechanics and Wear of Rail/Wheel Systems, Brisbane, Australia, Materials Australia, 2006] and the wear is assumed to be proportional to the friction work. Cases of both a free and a driven wheel with a constant torque are considered. The phase angles between dynamic wheel-rail force and roughness are examined and wear is found to be almost in-phase with roughness and therefore, no roughness growth is predicted by the model as presented in its current form. Although clearly in contradiction to reality where roughness grows under certain conditions this work leads to interesting question about why roughness growth is predicted by a simple contact model but not when complexity is increased to include non-Hertzian and non-steady contact conditions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1572-1583
Number of pages12
JournalWear
Volume265
Issue number11-12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Nov 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Railroad tracks
rails
wheels
Rails
Wheels
Wear of materials
roughness
Surface roughness
simulation
interactions
vehicles
Timoshenko beams
ballast
torque
congressional reports
Mechanics
phase shift
friction
Torque
Friction

Cite this

@article{6af6481a0552480a850a2a30022402eb,
title = "Simulation of wear on a rough rail using a time-domain wheel-track interaction model",
abstract = "This paper presents results from simulations of railhead wear due to initial sinusoidal and broad-band roughness using a time-domain wheel-track vertical interaction model integrated with a three-dimensional wheel-rail contact model. As typical roughness wavelengths are short and frequencies are high compared with vehicle body motions, the vehicle is simplified to an unsprung wheel mass. The rail is modelled as a Timoshenko beam discretely supported by pads, sleepers and ballast. The wheel-rail contact in the interaction model is modelled with a non-linear Hertzian contact spring. The obtained wheel-rail forces are then incorporated into the three-dimensional contact model to calculate wear over the railhead. The wheel-rail contact is modelled as non-Hertzian and non-steady based on the Variational Method [G. Xie, S.D. Iwnicki, Calculation of wear on a corrugated rail using a three-dimensional contact model, in: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Contact Mechanics and Wear of Rail/Wheel Systems, Brisbane, Australia, Materials Australia, 2006] and the wear is assumed to be proportional to the friction work. Cases of both a free and a driven wheel with a constant torque are considered. The phase angles between dynamic wheel-rail force and roughness are examined and wear is found to be almost in-phase with roughness and therefore, no roughness growth is predicted by the model as presented in its current form. Although clearly in contradiction to reality where roughness grows under certain conditions this work leads to interesting question about why roughness growth is predicted by a simple contact model but not when complexity is increased to include non-Hertzian and non-steady contact conditions.",
keywords = "Rail roughness, Wear, Wheel-rail contact, Wheel-track interaction",
author = "G. Xie and Iwnicki, {S. D.}",
year = "2008",
month = "11",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1016/j.wear.2008.03.016",
language = "English",
volume = "265",
pages = "1572--1583",
journal = "Wear",
issn = "0043-1648",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "11-12",

}

Simulation of wear on a rough rail using a time-domain wheel-track interaction model. / Xie, G.; Iwnicki, S. D.

In: Wear, Vol. 265, No. 11-12, 26.11.2008, p. 1572-1583.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Simulation of wear on a rough rail using a time-domain wheel-track interaction model

AU - Xie, G.

AU - Iwnicki, S. D.

PY - 2008/11/26

Y1 - 2008/11/26

N2 - This paper presents results from simulations of railhead wear due to initial sinusoidal and broad-band roughness using a time-domain wheel-track vertical interaction model integrated with a three-dimensional wheel-rail contact model. As typical roughness wavelengths are short and frequencies are high compared with vehicle body motions, the vehicle is simplified to an unsprung wheel mass. The rail is modelled as a Timoshenko beam discretely supported by pads, sleepers and ballast. The wheel-rail contact in the interaction model is modelled with a non-linear Hertzian contact spring. The obtained wheel-rail forces are then incorporated into the three-dimensional contact model to calculate wear over the railhead. The wheel-rail contact is modelled as non-Hertzian and non-steady based on the Variational Method [G. Xie, S.D. Iwnicki, Calculation of wear on a corrugated rail using a three-dimensional contact model, in: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Contact Mechanics and Wear of Rail/Wheel Systems, Brisbane, Australia, Materials Australia, 2006] and the wear is assumed to be proportional to the friction work. Cases of both a free and a driven wheel with a constant torque are considered. The phase angles between dynamic wheel-rail force and roughness are examined and wear is found to be almost in-phase with roughness and therefore, no roughness growth is predicted by the model as presented in its current form. Although clearly in contradiction to reality where roughness grows under certain conditions this work leads to interesting question about why roughness growth is predicted by a simple contact model but not when complexity is increased to include non-Hertzian and non-steady contact conditions.

AB - This paper presents results from simulations of railhead wear due to initial sinusoidal and broad-band roughness using a time-domain wheel-track vertical interaction model integrated with a three-dimensional wheel-rail contact model. As typical roughness wavelengths are short and frequencies are high compared with vehicle body motions, the vehicle is simplified to an unsprung wheel mass. The rail is modelled as a Timoshenko beam discretely supported by pads, sleepers and ballast. The wheel-rail contact in the interaction model is modelled with a non-linear Hertzian contact spring. The obtained wheel-rail forces are then incorporated into the three-dimensional contact model to calculate wear over the railhead. The wheel-rail contact is modelled as non-Hertzian and non-steady based on the Variational Method [G. Xie, S.D. Iwnicki, Calculation of wear on a corrugated rail using a three-dimensional contact model, in: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Contact Mechanics and Wear of Rail/Wheel Systems, Brisbane, Australia, Materials Australia, 2006] and the wear is assumed to be proportional to the friction work. Cases of both a free and a driven wheel with a constant torque are considered. The phase angles between dynamic wheel-rail force and roughness are examined and wear is found to be almost in-phase with roughness and therefore, no roughness growth is predicted by the model as presented in its current form. Although clearly in contradiction to reality where roughness grows under certain conditions this work leads to interesting question about why roughness growth is predicted by a simple contact model but not when complexity is increased to include non-Hertzian and non-steady contact conditions.

KW - Rail roughness

KW - Wear

KW - Wheel-rail contact

KW - Wheel-track interaction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=54149111905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.wear.2008.03.016

DO - 10.1016/j.wear.2008.03.016

M3 - Article

VL - 265

SP - 1572

EP - 1583

JO - Wear

JF - Wear

SN - 0043-1648

IS - 11-12

ER -