Single-blind randomised controlled trial of chemonucleolysis and manipulation in the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation

Anthony Burton, Malcolm Tillotson, John Cleary

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

91 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This single-blind randomised clinical trial compared osteopathic manipulative treatment with chemonucleolysis (used as a control of known efficacy) for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation. Forty patients with sciatica due to this diagnosis (confirmed by imaging) were treated either by chemonucleolysis or manipulation. Outcomes (leg pain, back pain and self-reported disability) were measured at 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 12 months. The mean values for all outcomes improved in both groups. By 12 months, there was no statistically significant difference in outcome between the treatments, but manipulation produced a statistically significant greater improvement for back pain and disability in the first few weeks. A similar number from both groups required additional orthopaedic intervention; there were no serious complications. Crude cost analysis suggested an overall financial advantage from manipulation. Because osteopathic manipulation produced a 12-month outcome that was equivalent to chemonucleolysis, it can be considered as an option for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation, at least in the absence of clear indications for surgery. Further study into the value of manipulation at a more acute stage is warranted.
LanguageEnglish
Pages202-207
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Spine Journal
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2000

Fingerprint

Intervertebral Disc Chemolysis
Osteopathic Manipulation
Randomized Controlled Trials
Back Pain
Sciatica
Orthopedics
Leg
Therapeutics
Costs and Cost Analysis
Pain

Cite this

@article{a4cf3c24d67c4b5297a18590c7a4b97b,
title = "Single-blind randomised controlled trial of chemonucleolysis and manipulation in the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation",
abstract = "This single-blind randomised clinical trial compared osteopathic manipulative treatment with chemonucleolysis (used as a control of known efficacy) for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation. Forty patients with sciatica due to this diagnosis (confirmed by imaging) were treated either by chemonucleolysis or manipulation. Outcomes (leg pain, back pain and self-reported disability) were measured at 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 12 months. The mean values for all outcomes improved in both groups. By 12 months, there was no statistically significant difference in outcome between the treatments, but manipulation produced a statistically significant greater improvement for back pain and disability in the first few weeks. A similar number from both groups required additional orthopaedic intervention; there were no serious complications. Crude cost analysis suggested an overall financial advantage from manipulation. Because osteopathic manipulation produced a 12-month outcome that was equivalent to chemonucleolysis, it can be considered as an option for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation, at least in the absence of clear indications for surgery. Further study into the value of manipulation at a more acute stage is warranted.",
keywords = "chemonucleolysis, lumbar disc herniation, manipulation, osteopathy, Randomised controlled trial, sciatica",
author = "Anthony Burton and Malcolm Tillotson and John Cleary",
year = "2000",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s005869900113",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "202--207",
journal = "European Spine Journal",
issn = "0940-6719",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "3",

}

Single-blind randomised controlled trial of chemonucleolysis and manipulation in the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation. / Burton, Anthony; Tillotson, Malcolm; Cleary, John.

In: European Spine Journal, Vol. 9, No. 3, 01.06.2000, p. 202-207.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Single-blind randomised controlled trial of chemonucleolysis and manipulation in the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation

AU - Burton, Anthony

AU - Tillotson, Malcolm

AU - Cleary, John

PY - 2000/6/1

Y1 - 2000/6/1

N2 - This single-blind randomised clinical trial compared osteopathic manipulative treatment with chemonucleolysis (used as a control of known efficacy) for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation. Forty patients with sciatica due to this diagnosis (confirmed by imaging) were treated either by chemonucleolysis or manipulation. Outcomes (leg pain, back pain and self-reported disability) were measured at 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 12 months. The mean values for all outcomes improved in both groups. By 12 months, there was no statistically significant difference in outcome between the treatments, but manipulation produced a statistically significant greater improvement for back pain and disability in the first few weeks. A similar number from both groups required additional orthopaedic intervention; there were no serious complications. Crude cost analysis suggested an overall financial advantage from manipulation. Because osteopathic manipulation produced a 12-month outcome that was equivalent to chemonucleolysis, it can be considered as an option for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation, at least in the absence of clear indications for surgery. Further study into the value of manipulation at a more acute stage is warranted.

AB - This single-blind randomised clinical trial compared osteopathic manipulative treatment with chemonucleolysis (used as a control of known efficacy) for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation. Forty patients with sciatica due to this diagnosis (confirmed by imaging) were treated either by chemonucleolysis or manipulation. Outcomes (leg pain, back pain and self-reported disability) were measured at 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 12 months. The mean values for all outcomes improved in both groups. By 12 months, there was no statistically significant difference in outcome between the treatments, but manipulation produced a statistically significant greater improvement for back pain and disability in the first few weeks. A similar number from both groups required additional orthopaedic intervention; there were no serious complications. Crude cost analysis suggested an overall financial advantage from manipulation. Because osteopathic manipulation produced a 12-month outcome that was equivalent to chemonucleolysis, it can be considered as an option for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation, at least in the absence of clear indications for surgery. Further study into the value of manipulation at a more acute stage is warranted.

KW - chemonucleolysis

KW - lumbar disc herniation

KW - manipulation

KW - osteopathy

KW - Randomised controlled trial

KW - sciatica

U2 - 10.1007/s005869900113

DO - 10.1007/s005869900113

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 202

EP - 207

JO - European Spine Journal

T2 - European Spine Journal

JF - European Spine Journal

SN - 0940-6719

IS - 3

ER -