Snakes & Ladders: In Defence of Studies of Youth Transition

Robert MacDonald, Paul Mason, Tracy Shildrick, Colin Webster, Les Johnston, Louise Ridley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

68 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although enjoying a period of renewed government policy interest and favourable research funding, youth studies has recently come under considerable intellectual attack, much of it from within. A common theme is that the major conceptual approach of most British youth research over the past twenty years - the sociological study of youth transitions - is not helpful in approaching 'the youth question'. The paper locates these recent critiques in terms of the development of 'two traditions' of youth research in the UK; a development which has served to separate structural and cultural analyses and so to limit the theoretical potential of the field.A recent qualitative study of young people growing up in Teesside, Northeast England is then discussed. Close analysis of the biographies of two of its participants are used as the basis for a reconsideration of the nature of transitions amongst 'socially excluded' youth and a discussion of some of the limitations of recent critiques of youth studies. The paper argues that the sort of research, methods and analysis employed here provide one example of how interests in the cultural and structural aspects of youth might be integrated. It concludes by reasserting the theoretical value of a broad conceptualisation of transition in understanding the social, economic and cultural processes that define the youth phase.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1-13
JournalSociological Research Online
Volume5
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Feb 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

youth research
social economics
government policy
funding

Cite this

MacDonald, R., Mason, P., Shildrick, T., Webster, C., Johnston, L., & Ridley, L. (2001). Snakes & Ladders: In Defence of Studies of Youth Transition. Sociological Research Online, 5(4), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.552
MacDonald, Robert ; Mason, Paul ; Shildrick, Tracy ; Webster, Colin ; Johnston, Les ; Ridley, Louise. / Snakes & Ladders : In Defence of Studies of Youth Transition. In: Sociological Research Online. 2001 ; Vol. 5, No. 4. pp. 1-13.
@article{1661bc454d454b77a97b81f269dd60ed,
title = "Snakes & Ladders: In Defence of Studies of Youth Transition",
abstract = "Although enjoying a period of renewed government policy interest and favourable research funding, youth studies has recently come under considerable intellectual attack, much of it from within. A common theme is that the major conceptual approach of most British youth research over the past twenty years - the sociological study of youth transitions - is not helpful in approaching 'the youth question'. The paper locates these recent critiques in terms of the development of 'two traditions' of youth research in the UK; a development which has served to separate structural and cultural analyses and so to limit the theoretical potential of the field.A recent qualitative study of young people growing up in Teesside, Northeast England is then discussed. Close analysis of the biographies of two of its participants are used as the basis for a reconsideration of the nature of transitions amongst 'socially excluded' youth and a discussion of some of the limitations of recent critiques of youth studies. The paper argues that the sort of research, methods and analysis employed here provide one example of how interests in the cultural and structural aspects of youth might be integrated. It concludes by reasserting the theoretical value of a broad conceptualisation of transition in understanding the social, economic and cultural processes that define the youth phase.",
keywords = "Social Exclusion, Transition, Youth, Youth Culture, Youth Studies",
author = "Robert MacDonald and Paul Mason and Tracy Shildrick and Colin Webster and Les Johnston and Louise Ridley",
year = "2001",
month = "2",
day = "28",
doi = "10.5153/sro.552",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "1--13",
journal = "Sociological Research Online",
issn = "1360-7804",
publisher = "Sociological Research Online",
number = "4",

}

MacDonald, R, Mason, P, Shildrick, T, Webster, C, Johnston, L & Ridley, L 2001, 'Snakes & Ladders: In Defence of Studies of Youth Transition', Sociological Research Online, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.552

Snakes & Ladders : In Defence of Studies of Youth Transition. / MacDonald, Robert; Mason, Paul; Shildrick, Tracy; Webster, Colin; Johnston, Les; Ridley, Louise.

In: Sociological Research Online, Vol. 5, No. 4, 28.02.2001, p. 1-13.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Snakes & Ladders

T2 - Sociological Research Online

AU - MacDonald, Robert

AU - Mason, Paul

AU - Shildrick, Tracy

AU - Webster, Colin

AU - Johnston, Les

AU - Ridley, Louise

PY - 2001/2/28

Y1 - 2001/2/28

N2 - Although enjoying a period of renewed government policy interest and favourable research funding, youth studies has recently come under considerable intellectual attack, much of it from within. A common theme is that the major conceptual approach of most British youth research over the past twenty years - the sociological study of youth transitions - is not helpful in approaching 'the youth question'. The paper locates these recent critiques in terms of the development of 'two traditions' of youth research in the UK; a development which has served to separate structural and cultural analyses and so to limit the theoretical potential of the field.A recent qualitative study of young people growing up in Teesside, Northeast England is then discussed. Close analysis of the biographies of two of its participants are used as the basis for a reconsideration of the nature of transitions amongst 'socially excluded' youth and a discussion of some of the limitations of recent critiques of youth studies. The paper argues that the sort of research, methods and analysis employed here provide one example of how interests in the cultural and structural aspects of youth might be integrated. It concludes by reasserting the theoretical value of a broad conceptualisation of transition in understanding the social, economic and cultural processes that define the youth phase.

AB - Although enjoying a period of renewed government policy interest and favourable research funding, youth studies has recently come under considerable intellectual attack, much of it from within. A common theme is that the major conceptual approach of most British youth research over the past twenty years - the sociological study of youth transitions - is not helpful in approaching 'the youth question'. The paper locates these recent critiques in terms of the development of 'two traditions' of youth research in the UK; a development which has served to separate structural and cultural analyses and so to limit the theoretical potential of the field.A recent qualitative study of young people growing up in Teesside, Northeast England is then discussed. Close analysis of the biographies of two of its participants are used as the basis for a reconsideration of the nature of transitions amongst 'socially excluded' youth and a discussion of some of the limitations of recent critiques of youth studies. The paper argues that the sort of research, methods and analysis employed here provide one example of how interests in the cultural and structural aspects of youth might be integrated. It concludes by reasserting the theoretical value of a broad conceptualisation of transition in understanding the social, economic and cultural processes that define the youth phase.

KW - Social Exclusion

KW - Transition

KW - Youth

KW - Youth Culture

KW - Youth Studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749606433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5153/sro.552

DO - 10.5153/sro.552

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 1

EP - 13

JO - Sociological Research Online

JF - Sociological Research Online

SN - 1360-7804

IS - 4

ER -