Social media and the cordon sanitaire

Populist politics, the online space, and a relationship that just isn’t there

Mark Littler, Matthew Feldman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Much research has sought to map the spread of extreme and populist political ideologies across Western Europe. Despite this, it often fails to explain how these ideologies move from the political fringes to positions of influence, subverting the traditional cordon sanitaire around extreme views. As a result of recent successes by populist actors, a more nuanced understanding of this process is required.

This paper posits an explanation for this success, suggesting that the growing pluralisation of the online media environment and the impact of social media content sharing are key to understanding how fringe political actors avoid both overt and implicit barriers to popularising extreme positions. Using data from the British Election Study, this paper offers a quantitative test of this approach, finding an inconsistent relationship between social media use and extreme political opinions. Potential explanations for this are discussed alongside possible directions for future research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)510-522
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Language and Politics
Volume16
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

social media
political opinion
online media
election research
politics
political ideology
political actor
Western Europe
pluralism
Ideologies
Populist
Social Media

Cite this

@article{8b9d9853a3ab48fd89fe37362720657d,
title = "Social media and the cordon sanitaire: Populist politics, the online space, and a relationship that just isn’t there",
abstract = "Much research has sought to map the spread of extreme and populist political ideologies across Western Europe. Despite this, it often fails to explain how these ideologies move from the political fringes to positions of influence, subverting the traditional cordon sanitaire around extreme views. As a result of recent successes by populist actors, a more nuanced understanding of this process is required.This paper posits an explanation for this success, suggesting that the growing pluralisation of the online media environment and the impact of social media content sharing are key to understanding how fringe political actors avoid both overt and implicit barriers to popularising extreme positions. Using data from the British Election Study, this paper offers a quantitative test of this approach, finding an inconsistent relationship between social media use and extreme political opinions. Potential explanations for this are discussed alongside possible directions for future research.",
author = "Mark Littler and Matthew Feldman",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "510--522",
journal = "Journal of Language and Politics",
issn = "1569-2159",
publisher = "John Benjamins Publishing Company",
number = "4",

}

Social media and the cordon sanitaire : Populist politics, the online space, and a relationship that just isn’t there. / Littler, Mark; Feldman, Matthew.

In: Journal of Language and Politics, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2017, p. 510-522.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social media and the cordon sanitaire

T2 - Populist politics, the online space, and a relationship that just isn’t there

AU - Littler, Mark

AU - Feldman, Matthew

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Much research has sought to map the spread of extreme and populist political ideologies across Western Europe. Despite this, it often fails to explain how these ideologies move from the political fringes to positions of influence, subverting the traditional cordon sanitaire around extreme views. As a result of recent successes by populist actors, a more nuanced understanding of this process is required.This paper posits an explanation for this success, suggesting that the growing pluralisation of the online media environment and the impact of social media content sharing are key to understanding how fringe political actors avoid both overt and implicit barriers to popularising extreme positions. Using data from the British Election Study, this paper offers a quantitative test of this approach, finding an inconsistent relationship between social media use and extreme political opinions. Potential explanations for this are discussed alongside possible directions for future research.

AB - Much research has sought to map the spread of extreme and populist political ideologies across Western Europe. Despite this, it often fails to explain how these ideologies move from the political fringes to positions of influence, subverting the traditional cordon sanitaire around extreme views. As a result of recent successes by populist actors, a more nuanced understanding of this process is required.This paper posits an explanation for this success, suggesting that the growing pluralisation of the online media environment and the impact of social media content sharing are key to understanding how fringe political actors avoid both overt and implicit barriers to popularising extreme positions. Using data from the British Election Study, this paper offers a quantitative test of this approach, finding an inconsistent relationship between social media use and extreme political opinions. Potential explanations for this are discussed alongside possible directions for future research.

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 510

EP - 522

JO - Journal of Language and Politics

JF - Journal of Language and Politics

SN - 1569-2159

IS - 4

ER -