Socio-technical imaginary of the fourth industrial revolution and its implications for vocational education and training: a literature review

James Avis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This literature review engages with a diverse and sometimes contradictory body of work, employing an analytic stance rooted in policy scholarship. It discusses rhetorical constructions of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4thIR), locating these in understandings of the economy rooted in a neo-liberalism which rests upon a capitalist terrain. The 4thIR is an ideological construct which reflects specific material interests and has particular implications for education and training. The 4thIR’s association with digitalisation and artificial intelligence is ambivalent. For some writers this leads to technological unemployment whilst for others, even though there is labour market disruption, there is no employment crisis that cannot be resolved. The strong connection between the 4thIR and labour market requirements are softened by those writers who adopt a qualitative analysis of advanced manufacturing work. These scholars suggest the relationship between technology and skill is rather more complex than the protagonists of technological unemployment describe. Neo-Marxist writers develop a qualitatively different account of the current conjuncture to the imaginary of the 4th IR. In this instance the analysis turns towards the elimination of labour from paid employment, together with the falling rate of profit and bypasses the former arguments. This review concludes by arguing that technology and artificial intelligence are entwined with social relations, being sites of class struggle. How this is played out is an outcome of the balance of power, not only within the social formation but globally. How far the development of the forces of production are compatible with capitalist relations is a moot point, as this is also a site of struggle. The paper draws out the implications for VET and considers progressive educational responses. However, such a practice needs to be set within a broader politics that is committed to the development of a socially just society.
LanguageEnglish
Pages337-363
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Vocational Education and Training
Volume70
Issue number3
Early online date21 Aug 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

industrial revolution
vocational education
Vocational Education
writer
artificial intelligence
unemployment
labor market
digitalization
class struggle
balance of power
neoliberalism
Social Relations
manufacturing
profit
labor
economy
politics
literature
education

Cite this

@article{09a9a9af03de4172b892b248b167cc50,
title = "Socio-technical imaginary of the fourth industrial revolution and its implications for vocational education and training: a literature review",
abstract = "This literature review engages with a diverse and sometimes contradictory body of work, employing an analytic stance rooted in policy scholarship. It discusses rhetorical constructions of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4thIR), locating these in understandings of the economy rooted in a neo-liberalism which rests upon a capitalist terrain. The 4thIR is an ideological construct which reflects specific material interests and has particular implications for education and training. The 4thIR’s association with digitalisation and artificial intelligence is ambivalent. For some writers this leads to technological unemployment whilst for others, even though there is labour market disruption, there is no employment crisis that cannot be resolved. The strong connection between the 4thIR and labour market requirements are softened by those writers who adopt a qualitative analysis of advanced manufacturing work. These scholars suggest the relationship between technology and skill is rather more complex than the protagonists of technological unemployment describe. Neo-Marxist writers develop a qualitatively different account of the current conjuncture to the imaginary of the 4th IR. In this instance the analysis turns towards the elimination of labour from paid employment, together with the falling rate of profit and bypasses the former arguments. This review concludes by arguing that technology and artificial intelligence are entwined with social relations, being sites of class struggle. How this is played out is an outcome of the balance of power, not only within the social formation but globally. How far the development of the forces of production are compatible with capitalist relations is a moot point, as this is also a site of struggle. The paper draws out the implications for VET and considers progressive educational responses. However, such a practice needs to be set within a broader politics that is committed to the development of a socially just society.",
keywords = "literature review, Industrie 4.0,, The fourth Industrial revolution, Vocational Education and training, neo-liberalism, capitalism, socio-technical imaginary",
author = "James Avis",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/13636820.2018.1498907",
language = "English",
volume = "70",
pages = "337--363",
journal = "Journal of Vocational Education and Training",
issn = "1363-6820",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Socio-technical imaginary of the fourth industrial revolution and its implications for vocational education and training

T2 - Journal of Vocational Education and Training

AU - Avis, James

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - This literature review engages with a diverse and sometimes contradictory body of work, employing an analytic stance rooted in policy scholarship. It discusses rhetorical constructions of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4thIR), locating these in understandings of the economy rooted in a neo-liberalism which rests upon a capitalist terrain. The 4thIR is an ideological construct which reflects specific material interests and has particular implications for education and training. The 4thIR’s association with digitalisation and artificial intelligence is ambivalent. For some writers this leads to technological unemployment whilst for others, even though there is labour market disruption, there is no employment crisis that cannot be resolved. The strong connection between the 4thIR and labour market requirements are softened by those writers who adopt a qualitative analysis of advanced manufacturing work. These scholars suggest the relationship between technology and skill is rather more complex than the protagonists of technological unemployment describe. Neo-Marxist writers develop a qualitatively different account of the current conjuncture to the imaginary of the 4th IR. In this instance the analysis turns towards the elimination of labour from paid employment, together with the falling rate of profit and bypasses the former arguments. This review concludes by arguing that technology and artificial intelligence are entwined with social relations, being sites of class struggle. How this is played out is an outcome of the balance of power, not only within the social formation but globally. How far the development of the forces of production are compatible with capitalist relations is a moot point, as this is also a site of struggle. The paper draws out the implications for VET and considers progressive educational responses. However, such a practice needs to be set within a broader politics that is committed to the development of a socially just society.

AB - This literature review engages with a diverse and sometimes contradictory body of work, employing an analytic stance rooted in policy scholarship. It discusses rhetorical constructions of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4thIR), locating these in understandings of the economy rooted in a neo-liberalism which rests upon a capitalist terrain. The 4thIR is an ideological construct which reflects specific material interests and has particular implications for education and training. The 4thIR’s association with digitalisation and artificial intelligence is ambivalent. For some writers this leads to technological unemployment whilst for others, even though there is labour market disruption, there is no employment crisis that cannot be resolved. The strong connection between the 4thIR and labour market requirements are softened by those writers who adopt a qualitative analysis of advanced manufacturing work. These scholars suggest the relationship between technology and skill is rather more complex than the protagonists of technological unemployment describe. Neo-Marxist writers develop a qualitatively different account of the current conjuncture to the imaginary of the 4th IR. In this instance the analysis turns towards the elimination of labour from paid employment, together with the falling rate of profit and bypasses the former arguments. This review concludes by arguing that technology and artificial intelligence are entwined with social relations, being sites of class struggle. How this is played out is an outcome of the balance of power, not only within the social formation but globally. How far the development of the forces of production are compatible with capitalist relations is a moot point, as this is also a site of struggle. The paper draws out the implications for VET and considers progressive educational responses. However, such a practice needs to be set within a broader politics that is committed to the development of a socially just society.

KW - literature review

KW - Industrie 4.0,

KW - The fourth Industrial revolution

KW - Vocational Education and training

KW - neo-liberalism

KW - capitalism

KW - socio-technical imaginary

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052116145&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13636820.2018.1498907

DO - 10.1080/13636820.2018.1498907

M3 - Article

VL - 70

SP - 337

EP - 363

JO - Journal of Vocational Education and Training

JF - Journal of Vocational Education and Training

SN - 1363-6820

IS - 3

ER -