Sociological theory and pharmacy practice research:(4) The contribution of interactionist sociology to understanding the experience of health and illness

Paul Bissell, Janine Morgall Traulsen, Lotte Stig Haugbølle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

So far in this series, we have explored the relevance of the work of Talcott Parsons and Karl Marx to pharmacy practice research.1, 2 Both these writers placed an emphasis on the ways in which human actions and, moreover, human consciousness are shaped by the requirements of the social system. Such perspectives came under fire, often from sociologists within the US, during the 1950s and 1960s. These sociologists were concerned to place the activities, experiences and understandings of human beings at the centre of the sociological endeavour. In doing so, they have provided some highly insightful examples of sociological research, especially as applied to health, illness and health care. It is this reaction against the “dehumanising” aspects of Marxist, functionalist and other sociological theories that we now turn to in our consideration of the emergence of symbolic interactionist sociology. Symbolic interactionist sociology has been partially responsible for the rise of a set of research techniques and theoretical concepts that will be familiar to many readers — the use of “naturalistic” methods of social research (observational or ethnographic work) and grounded theory,3 both of which figure increasingly within health services and pharmacy practice research. In this paper, we will look at the origins of interactionist sociology and comment on its relevance and application to the research agenda of pharmacy practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)213-224
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Journal of Pharmacy Practice
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Sociology
Health
Consciousness
Research
Health Services
Research Design
Delivery of Health Care
Health care
Social Theory
Pharmacy Research

Cite this

@article{1aed2beea8314789b341192dc3b1e055,
title = "Sociological theory and pharmacy practice research:(4) The contribution of interactionist sociology to understanding the experience of health and illness",
abstract = "So far in this series, we have explored the relevance of the work of Talcott Parsons and Karl Marx to pharmacy practice research.1, 2 Both these writers placed an emphasis on the ways in which human actions and, moreover, human consciousness are shaped by the requirements of the social system. Such perspectives came under fire, often from sociologists within the US, during the 1950s and 1960s. These sociologists were concerned to place the activities, experiences and understandings of human beings at the centre of the sociological endeavour. In doing so, they have provided some highly insightful examples of sociological research, especially as applied to health, illness and health care. It is this reaction against the “dehumanising” aspects of Marxist, functionalist and other sociological theories that we now turn to in our consideration of the emergence of symbolic interactionist sociology. Symbolic interactionist sociology has been partially responsible for the rise of a set of research techniques and theoretical concepts that will be familiar to many readers — the use of “naturalistic” methods of social research (observational or ethnographic work) and grounded theory,3 both of which figure increasingly within health services and pharmacy practice research. In this paper, we will look at the origins of interactionist sociology and comment on its relevance and application to the research agenda of pharmacy practice.",
author = "Paul Bissell and Traulsen, {Janine Morgall} and Haugb{\o}lle, {Lotte Stig}",
year = "2002",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/j.2042-7174.2002.tb00610.x",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "213--224",
journal = "International Journal of Pharmacy Practice",
issn = "0961-7671",
publisher = "Pharmaceutical Press",
number = "3",

}

Sociological theory and pharmacy practice research:(4) The contribution of interactionist sociology to understanding the experience of health and illness. / Bissell, Paul; Traulsen, Janine Morgall; Haugbølle, Lotte Stig.

In: International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, Vol. 10, No. 3, 09.2002, p. 213-224.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sociological theory and pharmacy practice research:(4) The contribution of interactionist sociology to understanding the experience of health and illness

AU - Bissell, Paul

AU - Traulsen, Janine Morgall

AU - Haugbølle, Lotte Stig

PY - 2002/9

Y1 - 2002/9

N2 - So far in this series, we have explored the relevance of the work of Talcott Parsons and Karl Marx to pharmacy practice research.1, 2 Both these writers placed an emphasis on the ways in which human actions and, moreover, human consciousness are shaped by the requirements of the social system. Such perspectives came under fire, often from sociologists within the US, during the 1950s and 1960s. These sociologists were concerned to place the activities, experiences and understandings of human beings at the centre of the sociological endeavour. In doing so, they have provided some highly insightful examples of sociological research, especially as applied to health, illness and health care. It is this reaction against the “dehumanising” aspects of Marxist, functionalist and other sociological theories that we now turn to in our consideration of the emergence of symbolic interactionist sociology. Symbolic interactionist sociology has been partially responsible for the rise of a set of research techniques and theoretical concepts that will be familiar to many readers — the use of “naturalistic” methods of social research (observational or ethnographic work) and grounded theory,3 both of which figure increasingly within health services and pharmacy practice research. In this paper, we will look at the origins of interactionist sociology and comment on its relevance and application to the research agenda of pharmacy practice.

AB - So far in this series, we have explored the relevance of the work of Talcott Parsons and Karl Marx to pharmacy practice research.1, 2 Both these writers placed an emphasis on the ways in which human actions and, moreover, human consciousness are shaped by the requirements of the social system. Such perspectives came under fire, often from sociologists within the US, during the 1950s and 1960s. These sociologists were concerned to place the activities, experiences and understandings of human beings at the centre of the sociological endeavour. In doing so, they have provided some highly insightful examples of sociological research, especially as applied to health, illness and health care. It is this reaction against the “dehumanising” aspects of Marxist, functionalist and other sociological theories that we now turn to in our consideration of the emergence of symbolic interactionist sociology. Symbolic interactionist sociology has been partially responsible for the rise of a set of research techniques and theoretical concepts that will be familiar to many readers — the use of “naturalistic” methods of social research (observational or ethnographic work) and grounded theory,3 both of which figure increasingly within health services and pharmacy practice research. In this paper, we will look at the origins of interactionist sociology and comment on its relevance and application to the research agenda of pharmacy practice.

U2 - 10.1111/j.2042-7174.2002.tb00610.x

DO - 10.1111/j.2042-7174.2002.tb00610.x

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 213

EP - 224

JO - International Journal of Pharmacy Practice

JF - International Journal of Pharmacy Practice

SN - 0961-7671

IS - 3

ER -