Sound archaeology

terminology, Palaeolithic cave art and the soundscape

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article is focused on the ways that terminology describing the study of music and sound within archaeology has changed over time, and how this reflects developing methodologies, exploring the expectations and issues raised by the use of differing kinds of language to define and describe such work. It begins with a discussion of music archaeology, addressing the problems of using the term 'music' in an archaeological context. It continues with an examination of archaeoacoustics and acoustics, and an emphasis on sound rather than music. This leads on to a study of sound archaeology and soundscapes, pointing out that it is important to consider the complete acoustic ecology of an archaeological site, in order to identify its affordances, those possibilities offered by invariant acoustic properties. Using a case study from northern Spain, the paper suggests that all of these methodological approaches have merit, and that a project benefits from their integration.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)292-304
Number of pages13
JournalWorld Archaeology
Volume46
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

music
Paleolithic
terminology
archaeology
art
technical language
cave
acoustics
acoustic property
ecology
Spain
examination
methodology
Palaeolithic
Music
Cave Art
Sound
Soundscape
Archaeology
language

Cite this

@article{fc8b749c099b4d1da17bb665a6160578,
title = "Sound archaeology: terminology, Palaeolithic cave art and the soundscape",
abstract = "This article is focused on the ways that terminology describing the study of music and sound within archaeology has changed over time, and how this reflects developing methodologies, exploring the expectations and issues raised by the use of differing kinds of language to define and describe such work. It begins with a discussion of music archaeology, addressing the problems of using the term 'music' in an archaeological context. It continues with an examination of archaeoacoustics and acoustics, and an emphasis on sound rather than music. This leads on to a study of sound archaeology and soundscapes, pointing out that it is important to consider the complete acoustic ecology of an archaeological site, in order to identify its affordances, those possibilities offered by invariant acoustic properties. Using a case study from northern Spain, the paper suggests that all of these methodological approaches have merit, and that a project benefits from their integration.",
keywords = "acoustics, archaeoacoustics, archaeology, caves, Music, Palaeolithic, sound",
author = "Rupert Till",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/00438243.2014.909106",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "292--304",
journal = "World Archaeology",
issn = "0043-8243",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Sound archaeology : terminology, Palaeolithic cave art and the soundscape. / Till, Rupert.

In: World Archaeology, Vol. 46, No. 3, 2014, p. 292-304.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sound archaeology

T2 - terminology, Palaeolithic cave art and the soundscape

AU - Till, Rupert

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This article is focused on the ways that terminology describing the study of music and sound within archaeology has changed over time, and how this reflects developing methodologies, exploring the expectations and issues raised by the use of differing kinds of language to define and describe such work. It begins with a discussion of music archaeology, addressing the problems of using the term 'music' in an archaeological context. It continues with an examination of archaeoacoustics and acoustics, and an emphasis on sound rather than music. This leads on to a study of sound archaeology and soundscapes, pointing out that it is important to consider the complete acoustic ecology of an archaeological site, in order to identify its affordances, those possibilities offered by invariant acoustic properties. Using a case study from northern Spain, the paper suggests that all of these methodological approaches have merit, and that a project benefits from their integration.

AB - This article is focused on the ways that terminology describing the study of music and sound within archaeology has changed over time, and how this reflects developing methodologies, exploring the expectations and issues raised by the use of differing kinds of language to define and describe such work. It begins with a discussion of music archaeology, addressing the problems of using the term 'music' in an archaeological context. It continues with an examination of archaeoacoustics and acoustics, and an emphasis on sound rather than music. This leads on to a study of sound archaeology and soundscapes, pointing out that it is important to consider the complete acoustic ecology of an archaeological site, in order to identify its affordances, those possibilities offered by invariant acoustic properties. Using a case study from northern Spain, the paper suggests that all of these methodological approaches have merit, and that a project benefits from their integration.

KW - acoustics

KW - archaeoacoustics

KW - archaeology

KW - caves

KW - Music

KW - Palaeolithic

KW - sound

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903457474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00438243.2014.909106

DO - 10.1080/00438243.2014.909106

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 292

EP - 304

JO - World Archaeology

JF - World Archaeology

SN - 0043-8243

IS - 3

ER -