Abstract
This chapter reviews corporal punishment in multiple settings – penal, educational and in the home – in four southern African countries which share common legal heritages. The principal focus is the respective role of legislatures, the executive and the judiciary in moving towards abolition (or not). The chapter highlights some pitfalls of failing to approach an abolitionist agenda with the necessary sensitivity to the nuances between the roles of the respective arms of government. Although the Canadian judgment of Canadian Foundation for Child Youth and the Law v Attorney General, Canada (2000) may present an unwelcome counterweight, the chapter nevertheless concludes that as far as corporal punishment in the home is concerned at least, judicial abolition is more likely than parliamentary acquiescence in prevailing parliamentary systems in the sub-region.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Corporal Punishment of Children |
| Subtitle of host publication | Comparative Legal and Social Developments towards Prohibition and Beyond |
| Editors | Bernadette Saunders, Pernilla Leviner, Bronwyn Naylor |
| Publisher | Brill Nijhoff |
| Chapter | 10 |
| Pages | 245-266 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Volume | 4 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9789004355972 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9789004355941 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 22 Nov 2018 |
Publication series
| Name | Stockholm Studies in Child Law and Children's Rights |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Brill Nijhoff |
| Volume | 4 |
| ISSN (Print) | 2405-8343 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Southern African Perspectives on Banning Corporal Punishment – a Comparison of Namibia, Botswana, South Africa and Zimbabwe'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver