TY - JOUR
T1 - States of violence
T2 - Exploring welfare state regimes as violence regimes by developing a violence regimes index
AU - Strid, Sofia
AU - Humbert, Anne Laure
AU - Hearn, Jeff
AU - Balkmar, Dag
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article: This article derives from the project ‘Regimes of Violence: Theorising and Explaining Variations in the Production of Violence in Welfare State Regimes,’ funded by Swedish Research Council, Grant 2017-01914.
Funding Information:
We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive critique; Birte Siim and Johanna Kantola, discussant and section chair at the European Conference on Politics and Gender 2019, for their helpful and constructive comments, and Mieke Tyrrell for the final editing and proofreading. The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article: This article derives from the project ?Regimes of Violence: Theorising and Explaining Variations in the Production of Violence in Welfare State Regimes,? funded by Swedish Research Council, Grant 2017-01914.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/7
Y1 - 2021/7
N2 - The aim of the article is to examine if and how the welfare state regime typology translates into a violence regime typology in a European context. It builds on the concept of violence regimes (Strid et al. 2017; Hearn et al. 2020) to empirically examine whether the production of interpersonal violence constitutes distinct regimes, and how these correspond (or not) with welfare regimes, gender regimes, and with other comparative metrics on violence, gender equality and feminist mobilisation and transnational actors. Its main contribution is to operationalise the concept of violence regimes, thereby moving from theory to a first empirical measurement. By first constructing a new composite measure of violence, a Violence Regimes Index, based on secondary administrative and survey data covering the then 28 EU member states, countries are clustered along two axes of violence: ‘deadly’ violence and ‘damaging’ gender-based violence. This serves to examine if, and how, the production of gendered violence in different states constitutes distinct regimes, analogous to welfare state regimes, as well as to enable future research and further comparisons and contrasts, specifically related to violence and the welfare state. By providing an empirical measurement of violence regimes in the EU, the article then contributes further to the debates on welfare, welfare regimes, and violence. It specifically contributes with discussions on the extent to which there are different violence regimes, comparable to welfare regimes, and with discussions on the relevance of moving from thinking about violence as an institution within other inequality regimes, to thinking about violence as a macro-regime, a way of governing and ruling in its own right. The article concludes that the exclusion of violence from mainstream social theory and research has produced results that may not be valid, and offers an alternative classification using the concept of violence regimes, thereby demonstrating the usefulness of the concept.
AB - The aim of the article is to examine if and how the welfare state regime typology translates into a violence regime typology in a European context. It builds on the concept of violence regimes (Strid et al. 2017; Hearn et al. 2020) to empirically examine whether the production of interpersonal violence constitutes distinct regimes, and how these correspond (or not) with welfare regimes, gender regimes, and with other comparative metrics on violence, gender equality and feminist mobilisation and transnational actors. Its main contribution is to operationalise the concept of violence regimes, thereby moving from theory to a first empirical measurement. By first constructing a new composite measure of violence, a Violence Regimes Index, based on secondary administrative and survey data covering the then 28 EU member states, countries are clustered along two axes of violence: ‘deadly’ violence and ‘damaging’ gender-based violence. This serves to examine if, and how, the production of gendered violence in different states constitutes distinct regimes, analogous to welfare state regimes, as well as to enable future research and further comparisons and contrasts, specifically related to violence and the welfare state. By providing an empirical measurement of violence regimes in the EU, the article then contributes further to the debates on welfare, welfare regimes, and violence. It specifically contributes with discussions on the extent to which there are different violence regimes, comparable to welfare regimes, and with discussions on the relevance of moving from thinking about violence as an institution within other inequality regimes, to thinking about violence as a macro-regime, a way of governing and ruling in its own right. The article concludes that the exclusion of violence from mainstream social theory and research has produced results that may not be valid, and offers an alternative classification using the concept of violence regimes, thereby demonstrating the usefulness of the concept.
KW - EU28
KW - gender regimes
KW - violence
KW - violence regimes
KW - violence regimes index
KW - welfare regimes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104387912&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/09589287211002370
DO - 10.1177/09589287211002370
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85104387912
VL - 31
SP - 321
EP - 336
JO - Journal of European Social Policy
JF - Journal of European Social Policy
SN - 0958-9287
IS - 3
ER -