Statistical Bias and Endorsement of Conspiracy Theories

Neil Dagnall, Andrew Denovan, Kenneth Drinkwater, Andrew Parker, Peter Clough

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous research proposes that endorsement of anomalous beliefs is associated with proneness to conjunction error. This supposition ignores important differences between belief types. Correspondingly, the present study examined the degree to which components of statistical bias predicted conspiratorial ideation and belief in the paranormal. Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling revealed that conjunction error was associated with conspiratorial ideation, whilst perception of randomness most strongly predicted belief in the paranormal. These findings opposed the notion that anomalous beliefs, by virtue of possession of common characteristics, relate similarly to conjunction error. With regard to conspiracy, conjunction-framing manipulations produced only minor variations in relationship strength. This supported the notion that conspiratorial ideation was associated with a domain-general susceptibility to conjunction error. Framing, however, did influence the relationship between belief in the paranormal and conjunction; whilst paranormal conjunctions were generally easier to solve, performance declined as level of paranormal belief increased.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)368-378
Number of pages11
JournalApplied Cognitive Psychology
Volume31
Issue number4
Early online date5 Jun 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Conspiracy Theory
Statistical Factor Analysis
Paranormal
Conjunction Errors
Research
Supposition
Manipulation
Structural Equation Modeling
Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Susceptibility
Possession
Conspiracy
Randomness

Cite this

Dagnall, Neil ; Denovan, Andrew ; Drinkwater, Kenneth ; Parker, Andrew ; Clough, Peter. / Statistical Bias and Endorsement of Conspiracy Theories. In: Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2017 ; Vol. 31, No. 4. pp. 368-378.
@article{fc6ca2d4805b4aec915fe9fdf0d93460,
title = "Statistical Bias and Endorsement of Conspiracy Theories",
abstract = "Previous research proposes that endorsement of anomalous beliefs is associated with proneness to conjunction error. This supposition ignores important differences between belief types. Correspondingly, the present study examined the degree to which components of statistical bias predicted conspiratorial ideation and belief in the paranormal. Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling revealed that conjunction error was associated with conspiratorial ideation, whilst perception of randomness most strongly predicted belief in the paranormal. These findings opposed the notion that anomalous beliefs, by virtue of possession of common characteristics, relate similarly to conjunction error. With regard to conspiracy, conjunction-framing manipulations produced only minor variations in relationship strength. This supported the notion that conspiratorial ideation was associated with a domain-general susceptibility to conjunction error. Framing, however, did influence the relationship between belief in the paranormal and conjunction; whilst paranormal conjunctions were generally easier to solve, performance declined as level of paranormal belief increased.",
author = "Neil Dagnall and Andrew Denovan and Kenneth Drinkwater and Andrew Parker and Peter Clough",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/acp.3331",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "368--378",
journal = "Applied Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "0888-4080",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Dagnall, N, Denovan, A, Drinkwater, K, Parker, A & Clough, P 2017, 'Statistical Bias and Endorsement of Conspiracy Theories', Applied Cognitive Psychology, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 368-378. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3331

Statistical Bias and Endorsement of Conspiracy Theories. / Dagnall, Neil; Denovan, Andrew; Drinkwater, Kenneth; Parker, Andrew; Clough, Peter.

In: Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 31, No. 4, 01.07.2017, p. 368-378.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Statistical Bias and Endorsement of Conspiracy Theories

AU - Dagnall, Neil

AU - Denovan, Andrew

AU - Drinkwater, Kenneth

AU - Parker, Andrew

AU - Clough, Peter

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - Previous research proposes that endorsement of anomalous beliefs is associated with proneness to conjunction error. This supposition ignores important differences between belief types. Correspondingly, the present study examined the degree to which components of statistical bias predicted conspiratorial ideation and belief in the paranormal. Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling revealed that conjunction error was associated with conspiratorial ideation, whilst perception of randomness most strongly predicted belief in the paranormal. These findings opposed the notion that anomalous beliefs, by virtue of possession of common characteristics, relate similarly to conjunction error. With regard to conspiracy, conjunction-framing manipulations produced only minor variations in relationship strength. This supported the notion that conspiratorial ideation was associated with a domain-general susceptibility to conjunction error. Framing, however, did influence the relationship between belief in the paranormal and conjunction; whilst paranormal conjunctions were generally easier to solve, performance declined as level of paranormal belief increased.

AB - Previous research proposes that endorsement of anomalous beliefs is associated with proneness to conjunction error. This supposition ignores important differences between belief types. Correspondingly, the present study examined the degree to which components of statistical bias predicted conspiratorial ideation and belief in the paranormal. Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling revealed that conjunction error was associated with conspiratorial ideation, whilst perception of randomness most strongly predicted belief in the paranormal. These findings opposed the notion that anomalous beliefs, by virtue of possession of common characteristics, relate similarly to conjunction error. With regard to conspiracy, conjunction-framing manipulations produced only minor variations in relationship strength. This supported the notion that conspiratorial ideation was associated with a domain-general susceptibility to conjunction error. Framing, however, did influence the relationship between belief in the paranormal and conjunction; whilst paranormal conjunctions were generally easier to solve, performance declined as level of paranormal belief increased.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85022344637&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/acp.3331

DO - 10.1002/acp.3331

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 368

EP - 378

JO - Applied Cognitive Psychology

JF - Applied Cognitive Psychology

SN - 0888-4080

IS - 4

ER -