TY - JOUR
T1 - Strategies for contextual reasoning with conflicts in ambient intelligence
AU - Bikakis, Antonis
AU - Antoniou, Grigoris
AU - Hasapis, Panayiotis
PY - 2011/4/1
Y1 - 2011/4/1
N2 - Ambient Intelligence environments host various agents that collect, process, change and share the available context information. The imperfect nature of context, the open and dynamic nature of such environments and the special characteristics of ambient agents have introduced new research challenges in the study of Distributed Artificial Intelligence. This paper proposes a solution based on the Multi-Context Systems paradigm, according to which local knowledge of ambient agents is encoded in rule theories (contexts), and information flow between agents is achieved through mapping rules that associate concepts used by different contexts. To resolve potential inconsistencies that may arise from the interaction of contexts through their mappings (global conflicts), we use a preference ordering on the system contexts, which may express the confidence that an agent has in the knowledge imported by other agents. On top of this model, we have developed four alternative strategies for global conflicts resolution, which mainly differ in the type and extent of context and preference information that is used to resolve potential conflicts. The four strategies have been respectively implemented in four versions of a distributed algorithm for query evaluation and evaluated in a simulated P2P system.
AB - Ambient Intelligence environments host various agents that collect, process, change and share the available context information. The imperfect nature of context, the open and dynamic nature of such environments and the special characteristics of ambient agents have introduced new research challenges in the study of Distributed Artificial Intelligence. This paper proposes a solution based on the Multi-Context Systems paradigm, according to which local knowledge of ambient agents is encoded in rule theories (contexts), and information flow between agents is achieved through mapping rules that associate concepts used by different contexts. To resolve potential inconsistencies that may arise from the interaction of contexts through their mappings (global conflicts), we use a preference ordering on the system contexts, which may express the confidence that an agent has in the knowledge imported by other agents. On top of this model, we have developed four alternative strategies for global conflicts resolution, which mainly differ in the type and extent of context and preference information that is used to resolve potential conflicts. The four strategies have been respectively implemented in four versions of a distributed algorithm for query evaluation and evaluated in a simulated P2P system.
KW - Ambient intelligence
KW - Contextual reasoning
KW - Distributed reasoning
KW - Multi-context systems
KW - Reasoning with preferences
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79953164510&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10115-010-0293-0
DO - 10.1007/s10115-010-0293-0
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:79953164510
VL - 27
SP - 45
EP - 84
JO - Knowledge and Information Systems
JF - Knowledge and Information Systems
SN - 0219-1377
IS - 1
ER -