Structural barriers to the take-up of higher level NVQs

Stephen Swailes, Simon Roodhouse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article explores perceptions of barriers to the take-up of higher level NVQs (levels 4/5). The literature on higher NVQ adoption is reviewed together with uptake statistics. Research involving interviews and case studies showed that the most successful higher NVQs are linked to professional qualifying routes, have generic application across a range of sectors or fill gaps where qualifications were not previously established. Higher NVQs suffer from credibility problems and variable delivery quality partly accounts for a tarnished image. Support for occupational standards is strong, but their design is not generally suited to higher qualifications. Awarding bodies need to assess the learning experience on award programmes more closely. Funding mechanisms disadvantage higher NVQs particularly in the university sector. NVQs are perceived to be relatively costly; however, there is little data available to enable objective comparison. Suggestions for overcoming these barriers are offered.

LanguageEnglish
Pages85-112
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Vocational Education and Training
Volume55
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

qualification
credibility
funding
statistics
university
interview
learning
experience
literature

Cite this

@article{e3cc25d110a344cb835c988847e79864,
title = "Structural barriers to the take-up of higher level NVQs",
abstract = "This article explores perceptions of barriers to the take-up of higher level NVQs (levels 4/5). The literature on higher NVQ adoption is reviewed together with uptake statistics. Research involving interviews and case studies showed that the most successful higher NVQs are linked to professional qualifying routes, have generic application across a range of sectors or fill gaps where qualifications were not previously established. Higher NVQs suffer from credibility problems and variable delivery quality partly accounts for a tarnished image. Support for occupational standards is strong, but their design is not generally suited to higher qualifications. Awarding bodies need to assess the learning experience on award programmes more closely. Funding mechanisms disadvantage higher NVQs particularly in the university sector. NVQs are perceived to be relatively costly; however, there is little data available to enable objective comparison. Suggestions for overcoming these barriers are offered.",
author = "Stephen Swailes and Simon Roodhouse",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1080/13636820300200220",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "85--112",
journal = "Journal of Vocational Education and Training",
issn = "1363-6820",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Structural barriers to the take-up of higher level NVQs. / Swailes, Stephen; Roodhouse, Simon.

In: Journal of Vocational Education and Training, Vol. 55, No. 1, 2003, p. 85-112.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Structural barriers to the take-up of higher level NVQs

AU - Swailes, Stephen

AU - Roodhouse, Simon

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - This article explores perceptions of barriers to the take-up of higher level NVQs (levels 4/5). The literature on higher NVQ adoption is reviewed together with uptake statistics. Research involving interviews and case studies showed that the most successful higher NVQs are linked to professional qualifying routes, have generic application across a range of sectors or fill gaps where qualifications were not previously established. Higher NVQs suffer from credibility problems and variable delivery quality partly accounts for a tarnished image. Support for occupational standards is strong, but their design is not generally suited to higher qualifications. Awarding bodies need to assess the learning experience on award programmes more closely. Funding mechanisms disadvantage higher NVQs particularly in the university sector. NVQs are perceived to be relatively costly; however, there is little data available to enable objective comparison. Suggestions for overcoming these barriers are offered.

AB - This article explores perceptions of barriers to the take-up of higher level NVQs (levels 4/5). The literature on higher NVQ adoption is reviewed together with uptake statistics. Research involving interviews and case studies showed that the most successful higher NVQs are linked to professional qualifying routes, have generic application across a range of sectors or fill gaps where qualifications were not previously established. Higher NVQs suffer from credibility problems and variable delivery quality partly accounts for a tarnished image. Support for occupational standards is strong, but their design is not generally suited to higher qualifications. Awarding bodies need to assess the learning experience on award programmes more closely. Funding mechanisms disadvantage higher NVQs particularly in the university sector. NVQs are perceived to be relatively costly; however, there is little data available to enable objective comparison. Suggestions for overcoming these barriers are offered.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84990353066&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13636820300200220

DO - 10.1080/13636820300200220

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 85

EP - 112

JO - Journal of Vocational Education and Training

T2 - Journal of Vocational Education and Training

JF - Journal of Vocational Education and Training

SN - 1363-6820

IS - 1

ER -