2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Pre-registration nursing students throughout the United Kingdom (UK) are required to complete a minimum number of theory hours within the course. Anecdotal evidence suggests that students are required to attend campus for approximately fifty percent of the theory hours. The remaining theory hours are often labelled as 'study time' in which students are not required to attend campus. There is a general assumption amongst many academics that all students are prepared and motivated to direct their learning and therefore use this time to study. However some students chose to work during this time and many have dependents. Considering the increasing cost of nurse education combined with the government cuts to student bursaries in England it is timely to review the literature to determine how study time is used within pre-registration nurse education. Objective: To present a critical review of the literature pertaining to study time in pre-registration nurse education. Design: An integrative review of the literature. Data Sources: A search of electronic databases: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL); Cochrane; Medline; Science Direct; Blackwell Synergy; Electronic Journals Service (EJS); Scopus; Taylor & Francis, Eric and Routledge Wiley was undertaken. Review Methods: The inclusion criteria consisted of peer reviewed primary research, discussion papers, unpublished doctoral theses' and editorial papers directly related to the key words and nurse education published in English. Results: Twelve papers were included in the review. Analysis of the papers led to the development of two themes: orientation to self-directed learning (SDL) and preparation for SDL. Conclusions: The literature demonstrates that pre-registration nursing students lack the necessary skills for SDL. There is a lack of research on how study time is used within pre-registration nurse education. This calls for empirical research to fully explore how nursing students and lecturers perceive study time within pre-registration nursing curricula.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)17-23
Number of pages7
JournalNurse Education Today
Volume41
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2016

Fingerprint

nurse
Nurses
Education
nursing
Students
Nursing Students
education
Learning
student
Nursing
learning
electronics
Empirical Research
Information Storage and Retrieval
literature
time
lack
Research
England
Curriculum

Cite this

@article{23bcfe0ba6ee4f0aa9c24c15faf01154,
title = "Study time within pre-registration nurse education: A critical review of the literature",
abstract = "Background: Pre-registration nursing students throughout the United Kingdom (UK) are required to complete a minimum number of theory hours within the course. Anecdotal evidence suggests that students are required to attend campus for approximately fifty percent of the theory hours. The remaining theory hours are often labelled as 'study time' in which students are not required to attend campus. There is a general assumption amongst many academics that all students are prepared and motivated to direct their learning and therefore use this time to study. However some students chose to work during this time and many have dependents. Considering the increasing cost of nurse education combined with the government cuts to student bursaries in England it is timely to review the literature to determine how study time is used within pre-registration nurse education. Objective: To present a critical review of the literature pertaining to study time in pre-registration nurse education. Design: An integrative review of the literature. Data Sources: A search of electronic databases: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL); Cochrane; Medline; Science Direct; Blackwell Synergy; Electronic Journals Service (EJS); Scopus; Taylor & Francis, Eric and Routledge Wiley was undertaken. Review Methods: The inclusion criteria consisted of peer reviewed primary research, discussion papers, unpublished doctoral theses' and editorial papers directly related to the key words and nurse education published in English. Results: Twelve papers were included in the review. Analysis of the papers led to the development of two themes: orientation to self-directed learning (SDL) and preparation for SDL. Conclusions: The literature demonstrates that pre-registration nursing students lack the necessary skills for SDL. There is a lack of research on how study time is used within pre-registration nurse education. This calls for empirical research to fully explore how nursing students and lecturers perceive study time within pre-registration nursing curricula.",
keywords = "Adult learning, Directed study time, Learning styles, Lifelong learning, Self-directed learning, Student nurses, Study skills, Study time",
author = "Caroline Barker and Nigel King and Michael Snowden and Karen Ousey",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.nedt.2016.03.019",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "17--23",
journal = "Nurse Education Today",
issn = "0260-6917",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Study time within pre-registration nurse education

T2 - A critical review of the literature

AU - Barker, Caroline

AU - King, Nigel

AU - Snowden, Michael

AU - Ousey, Karen

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - Background: Pre-registration nursing students throughout the United Kingdom (UK) are required to complete a minimum number of theory hours within the course. Anecdotal evidence suggests that students are required to attend campus for approximately fifty percent of the theory hours. The remaining theory hours are often labelled as 'study time' in which students are not required to attend campus. There is a general assumption amongst many academics that all students are prepared and motivated to direct their learning and therefore use this time to study. However some students chose to work during this time and many have dependents. Considering the increasing cost of nurse education combined with the government cuts to student bursaries in England it is timely to review the literature to determine how study time is used within pre-registration nurse education. Objective: To present a critical review of the literature pertaining to study time in pre-registration nurse education. Design: An integrative review of the literature. Data Sources: A search of electronic databases: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL); Cochrane; Medline; Science Direct; Blackwell Synergy; Electronic Journals Service (EJS); Scopus; Taylor & Francis, Eric and Routledge Wiley was undertaken. Review Methods: The inclusion criteria consisted of peer reviewed primary research, discussion papers, unpublished doctoral theses' and editorial papers directly related to the key words and nurse education published in English. Results: Twelve papers were included in the review. Analysis of the papers led to the development of two themes: orientation to self-directed learning (SDL) and preparation for SDL. Conclusions: The literature demonstrates that pre-registration nursing students lack the necessary skills for SDL. There is a lack of research on how study time is used within pre-registration nurse education. This calls for empirical research to fully explore how nursing students and lecturers perceive study time within pre-registration nursing curricula.

AB - Background: Pre-registration nursing students throughout the United Kingdom (UK) are required to complete a minimum number of theory hours within the course. Anecdotal evidence suggests that students are required to attend campus for approximately fifty percent of the theory hours. The remaining theory hours are often labelled as 'study time' in which students are not required to attend campus. There is a general assumption amongst many academics that all students are prepared and motivated to direct their learning and therefore use this time to study. However some students chose to work during this time and many have dependents. Considering the increasing cost of nurse education combined with the government cuts to student bursaries in England it is timely to review the literature to determine how study time is used within pre-registration nurse education. Objective: To present a critical review of the literature pertaining to study time in pre-registration nurse education. Design: An integrative review of the literature. Data Sources: A search of electronic databases: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL); Cochrane; Medline; Science Direct; Blackwell Synergy; Electronic Journals Service (EJS); Scopus; Taylor & Francis, Eric and Routledge Wiley was undertaken. Review Methods: The inclusion criteria consisted of peer reviewed primary research, discussion papers, unpublished doctoral theses' and editorial papers directly related to the key words and nurse education published in English. Results: Twelve papers were included in the review. Analysis of the papers led to the development of two themes: orientation to self-directed learning (SDL) and preparation for SDL. Conclusions: The literature demonstrates that pre-registration nursing students lack the necessary skills for SDL. There is a lack of research on how study time is used within pre-registration nurse education. This calls for empirical research to fully explore how nursing students and lecturers perceive study time within pre-registration nursing curricula.

KW - Adult learning

KW - Directed study time

KW - Learning styles

KW - Lifelong learning

KW - Self-directed learning

KW - Student nurses

KW - Study skills

KW - Study time

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962406661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.03.019

DO - 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.03.019

M3 - Review article

VL - 41

SP - 17

EP - 23

JO - Nurse Education Today

JF - Nurse Education Today

SN - 0260-6917

ER -